The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many-body systems
Abstract
Quantum computers, although not yet available on the market, will revolutionise the future of information processing. Already now, quantum computers of special purpose, i.e., quantum simulators, are within reach. The physics of ultracold atoms, ions, and molecules offers unprecedented possibilities of control of quantum many systems, and novel possibilities of applications for quantum information and quantum metrology. Particularly fascinating is the possibility of using ultracold atoms in lattices to simulate condensed matter or even high energy physics. This book provides a comprehensive overview of ultracold lattice gases as quantum simulators, an interdisciplinary field involving atomic, molecular, and optical physics; quantum optics; quantum information; and condensed matter and high energy physics. It includes some introductory chapters on basic concepts and methods, and focuses on the physics of spinor, dipolar, disordered, and frustrated lattice gases, before reviewing in detail artificial lattice gauge fields with ultracold gases. The last part of the book moves onto a discussion of possible implementations universal quantum computers with ultracold atoms. After a crash course in quantum information theory, several models of quantum computation with ultracold gases are presented, as well as the current understanding of condensed matter from a quantum information perspective. The book ends with the general discussion of various detection methods that are unique for ultracold atoms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices [3, 5-15, 19, 71].”
From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 841
Celi, A., Graß, T., Ferris, A. J., et al. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.075110 · Cited by 12
Self-citationHadron physics from lattice QCD
Bietenholz, W. (2016) · International Journal of Modern Physics E · doi:10.1142/s0218301316420088 · Cited by 12
Wang, L., Sun, Q., Liu, W.-M., Juzeliūnas, G., & Ji, A.-C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.053628 · Cited by 12
Born-Bogoliubov-Green-Kirkwood-Yvon hierarchy for ultracold bosonic systems
Krönke, S., & Schmelcher, P. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.013629 · Cited by 12
Coherent optical nanotweezers for ultracold atoms
Bienias, P., Subhankar, S., Wang, Y., Tsui, T.-C., Jendrzejewski, F., Tiecke, T. G., Juzeliūnas, G., Jiang, L., Rolston, S. L., Porto, J. V., et al. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.013306 · Cited by 13
Permutation matrix representation quantum Monte Carlo
Gupta, L., Albash, T., & Hen, I. (2020) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab9e64 · Cited by 16
Zohar, E. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.034518 · Cited by 12
One-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model with pure three-body interactions
Sowiński, T. (2014) · Open Physics · doi:10.2478/s11534-014-0481-8 · Cited by 12
Nonuniversality of entanglement convertibility
Bragança, H., Mascarenhas, E., Luiz, G. I., Duarte, C., Pereira, R. G., Santos, M. F., & Aguiar, M. C. O. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.235132 · Cited by 11
Superfluid Bloch dynamics in an incommensurate optical lattice
Reeves, J. B., Gadway, B., Bergeman, T. H., Danshita, I., & Schneble, D. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/065011 · Cited by 11
Proposal for observing non-Abelian statistics of Majorana-Shockley fermions in an optical lattice
Deng, D., Wang, S.-T., Sun, K., & Duan, L.-M. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.094513 · Cited by 12
Density-induced geometric frustration of ultra-cold bosons in optical lattices
Mishra, T., Greschner, S., & Santos, L. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045016 · Cited by 14
Work fluctuations in bosonic Josephson junctions
Lena, R. G., Palma, G. M., & Chiara, G. D. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.053618 · Cited by 12
Bera, A., Rakshit, D., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.224441 · Cited by 12
Two supersolid phases in hard-core extended Bose–Hubbard model
Chen, Y.-C., & Yang, M.-F. (2017) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/aa8bfb · Cited by 9
2-qubit quantum state transfer in spin chains and cold atoms with weak links
Lorenzo, S., Apollaro, T. J. G., Trombettoni, A., & Paganelli, S. (2017) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974991750037x · Cited by 12
Shimizu, K., Hirano, T., Park, J., Kuno, Y., & Ichinose, I. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.063603 · Cited by 11
Machine Learning Applied to Quantum Synchronization‐Assisted Probing
Estarellas, G. G., Giorgi, G. L., Soriano, M. C., & Zambrini, R. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201800085 · Cited by 12
“atoms in optical lattices [51].”
Quantum transport on generalized scale-free networks
Maciel, C. M., Mendes, C. F. O., Strunz, W. T., & Galiceanu, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.032219 · Cited by 11
Synthetic superfluid chemistry with vortex-trapped quantum impurities
Edmonds, M., Eto, M., & Nitta, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023085 · Cited by 12
Devil's staircase of topological Peierls insulators and Peierls supersolids
Chanda, T., González-Cuadra, D., Lewenstein, M., Tagliacozzo, L., & Zakrzewski, J. (2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.2.076 · Cited by 14
Self-citationGiampaolo, S. M., Hiesmayr, B. C., & Illuminati, F. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.144406 · Cited by 12
Factorization in spin systems under general fields and separable ground-state engineering
Cerezo, M., Rossignoli, R., & Canosa, N. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042335 · Cited by 13
Kosior, A., & Sacha, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.023602 · Cited by 11
Controlling disorder with periodically modulated interactions
Kosior, A., Major, J., Płodzień, M., & Zakrzewski, J. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.023606 · Cited by 11
Real-time dynamics of open quantum spin systems driven by dissipative processes
Hebenstreit, F., Banerjee, D., Hornung, M., Jiang, F.-J., Schranz, F., & Wiese, U. ‐. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.035116 · Cited by 10
Phase diagrams of Bose-Hubbard model and antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 models on a honeycomb lattice
Nakafuji, T., & Ichinose, I. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.013628 · Cited by 11
String tension and robustness of confinement properties in the Schwinger-Thirring model
Barros, J. C. P., Dalmonte, M., & Trombettoni, A. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.036009 · Cited by 9
Quasicondensation of Bilayer Excitons in a Periodic Potential
Lagoin, C., Suffit, S., West, K. W., Baldwin, K., Pfeiffer, L. N., Holzmann, M., & Dubin, F. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.067404 · Cited by 10
Cai, B.-J., & Li, B.-A. (2022) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.064607 · Cited by 11
On the Number and Location of Eigenvalues of the Two Particle Schrödinger Operator on a Lattice
Lakaev, S. N., & Khamidov, S. I. (2022) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080222150173 · Cited by 11
Tunable anisotropic superfluidity in an optical kagome superlattice
Zhang, X., Wang, T., Eggert, S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.014512 · Cited by 11
Tunneling-induced angular momentum for single cold atoms
Menchon-Enrich, R., McEndoo, S., Mompart, J., Ahufinger, V., & Busch, T. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.013626 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe glass to superfluid transition in dirty bosons on a lattice
Stasińska, J., Massignan, P., Bishop, M., et al. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043043 · Cited by 11
Self-citationBera, A., Rakshit, D., Lewenstein, M., Sen, A., Sen, U., & Wehr, J. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.014421 · Cited by 11
Self-citationChougale, Y., & Nath, R. (2016) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/14/144005 · Cited by 11
Multiple transitions of coupled atom-molecule bosonic mixtures in two dimensions
de Parny, L. D. F., Rançon, A., & Roscilde, T. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.023639 · Cited by 11
Toolbox for linear optics in a one-dimensional lattice via minimal control
Compagno, E., Banchi, L., & Bose, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022701 · Cited by 9
“When U→∞ the BoseHubbard Hamiltonian (1) describes hard-core bosons and the system is equivalent, via the Jordan-Wigner transformation, to a spin- 1 2 chain with XX interactions [33].”
InfluentialUnconventional fermionic pairing states in a monochromatically tilted optical lattice
Nocera, A., Polkovnikov, A., & Feiguin, A. E. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.023601 · Cited by 11
Fermion pairing in mixed-dimensional atomic mixtures
Okamoto, J., Mathey, L., & Huang, W.-M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.053633 · Cited by 11
Improving mean-field theory for bosons in optical lattices via degenerate perturbation theory
Kübler, M., Sant’Ana, F. T., dos Santos, F. E. A., & Pelster, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.063603 · Cited by 11
Ground state modulations in the CPN−1 model
Flachi, A., Fucci, G., Nitta, M., Takada, S., & Yoshii, R. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.085006 · Cited by 12
Characterizing the phase diagram of finite-size dipolar Bose-Hubbard systems
Rosson, P., Kiffner, M., Mur-Petit, J., & Jaksch, D. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.013616 · Cited by 12
Fine structures in the spectrum of the open-boundary Heisenberg chain at large anisotropies
Sharma, A., & Haque, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.043608 · Cited by 11
Vortex dynamics of rotating Bose-Einstein condensate of microcavity polaritons
Padhi, B., Duboscq, R., Niranjan, A., & Soni, R. K. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-50775-4 · Cited by 11
Mean-field approaches to the Bose–Hubbard model with three-body local interaction
Sowiński, T., & Chhajlany, R. W. (2014) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2014/t160/014038 · Cited by 11
Variational approach for interacting ultra-cold atoms in arbitrary one-dimensional confinement
Kościk, P., Płodzień, M., & Sowiński, T. (2018) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/123/36001 · Cited by 11
Staggered ground states in an optical lattice
Johnstone, D., Westerberg, N., Duncan, C. W., et al. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.043614 · Cited by 11
Semimetal-superfluid quantum phase transitions in 2D and 3D lattices with Dirac pointsPreprint
Mazzucchi, G., Lepori, L., & Trombettoni, A. (2016) · Cited by 13
Real-time simulation of large open quantum spin systems driven by dissipation
Banerjee, D., Jiang, F.-J., Kon, M., & Wiese, U. ‐. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.241104 · Cited by 9
Otajonov, S. R., Umarov, B. A., & Abdullaev, F. K. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.054206 · Cited by 10
“Using the standard discretization technique, we derive a discrete equation that captures the essential dynamics of the system on a lattice [28, 29, 44]: where κ is the hopping rate between the lattice sites, γ = ˜ γ | w ( z ) | 4 dz and δ = ˜ δ | w ( z ) | 5 dz .”
Effective field theories for two-component repulsive bosons on lattice and their phase diagrams
Kuno, Y., Kataoka, K., & Ichinose, I. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.014518 · Cited by 10
Quantum bright solitons in the Bose-Hubbard model with site-dependent repulsive interactions
Barbiero, L., Malomed, B. A., & Salasnich, L. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063611 · Cited by 10
Dynamical equilibration of topological properties
Kruckenhauser, A., & Budich, J. C. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.195124 · Cited by 10
Quantum Simulating the Electron Transport in Quantum Cascade Laser Structures
Trombettoni, A., Scazza, F., Minardi, F., Roati, G., Cappelli, F., Consolino, L., Smerzi, A., & Natale, P. D. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100044 · Cited by 11
Finding the phase diagram of strongly correlated disordered bosons using quantum quenches
Villa, L., Thomson, S. J., & Sanchez-Palencia, L. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.023323 · Cited by 10
Universal equilibration dynamics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Bandyopadhyay, S., Uhrich, P., Paviglianiti, A., & Hauke, P. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-05-24-1022 · Cited by 12
Quantum droplet of a two-component Bose gas in an optical lattice near the Mott insulator transition
Machida, Y., Danshita, I., Yamamoto, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.l031301 · Cited by 10
Superexchange Liquefaction of Strongly Correlated Lattice Dipolar Bosons
Morera, I., Ołdziejewski, R., Astrakharchik, G. E., & Juliá-Díaz, B. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.023602 · Cited by 10
Energy-level inversion for vortex states in spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates
Luo, H.-B., Li, L., Malomed, B. A., Li, Y., & Liu, B. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.013326 · Cited by 10
Universal scaling for a quantum discontinuity critical point and quantum quenches
Suzuki, S., & Dutta, A. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.064419 · Cited by 10
Loiko, Y. L., Ahufinger, V., Menchon-Enrich, R., et al. (2014) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2014-40696-3 · Cited by 10
Self-citationRobustness of discrete semifluxons in closed Bose–Hubbard chains
Gallemí, A., Guilleumas, M., Martorell, J., Mayol, R., Polls, A., & Juliá-Díaz, B. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/075005 · Cited by 10
“80 885 [31] Lewenstein M, Sanpera A and Ahufinger V 2012 Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFrom Kondo effect to weak-link regime in quantum spin- 12 spin chains
Giuliano, D., Rossini, D., & Trombettoni, A. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.235164 · Cited by 11
Full counting statistics of the momentum occupation numbers of the Tonks-Girardeau gas
Devillard, P., Chevallier, D., Vignolo, P., & Albert, M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.063604 · Cited by 10
On Spectrum of the Discrete Bilaplacian with Zero-Range Perturbation
Kholmatov, S. Y., & Pardabaev, M. (2021) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080221060135 · Cited by 10
Patterns of genuine multipartite entanglement in frustrated quantum spin systems
Jindal, L., Rane, A. D., Dhar, H. S., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.012316 · Cited by 11
Numerical computation of dynamically important excited states of many-body systems
Łącki, M., Delande, D., & Zakrzewski, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013602 · Cited by 13
Topological phases of lattice bosons with a dynamical gauge field
Raventós, D., Graß, T., Juliá-Díaz, B., Santos, L., & Lewenstein, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.033605 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSimulating Artificial 1D Physics with Ultra‐Cold Fermionic Atoms: Three Exemplary Themes
Dobrzyniecki, J., & Sowiński, T. (2020) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000010 · Cited by 13
Entanglement spectrum and Rényi entropies of nonrelativistic conformal fermions
Porter, W. J., & Drut, J. E. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.165112 · Cited by 9
Ghosh, S. K., & Yadav, U. K. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.043634 · Cited by 8
The Number and Location of Eigenvalues for the Two-Particle Schrödinger Operators on Lattices
Lakaev, S. N., & Akhmadova, M. O. (2023) · Complex Analysis and Operator Theory · doi:10.1007/s11785-023-01393-1 · Cited by 12
Amorphous quantum magnets in a two-dimensional Rydberg atom array
Julià-Farré, S., Vovrosh, J., & Dauphin, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012602 · Cited by 11
Nonequilibrium self-energy functional approach to the dynamical Mott transition
Hofmann, F., ECKSTEIN, M. C., & Potthoff, M. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.235104 · Cited by 9
Bhowmik, A., & Alon, O. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04312-6 · Cited by 9
Lozano-Méndez, K., Cásares, A. H., & Caballero-Benítez, S. F. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.080601 · Cited by 11
Analogue gravity simulation of superpositions of spacetimes
Barceló, C., Garay, L. J., & García-Moreno, G. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10702-5 · Cited by 15
Dynamics of a buffer-gas-loaded, deep optical trap for molecules
Singh, A., Maisenbacher, L., Lin, Z.-G., Axelrod, J., Panda, C., & Müller, H. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033008 · Cited by 8
From Bloch oscillations to a steady-state current in strongly biased mesoscopic devices
Pinho, J. M. A., Pires, J. P. S., João, S. M., Amorim, B., & Lopes, J. M. V. P. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.075402 · Cited by 12
Pino, H., Alba, E., Taron, J., García‐Ripoll, J. J., & Barberán, N. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.053611 · Cited by 8
Interplay between exotic superfluidity and magnetism in a chain of four-component ultracold atoms
Szirmai, E., Barcza, G., Sólyom, J., & Legeza, Ö. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.013610 · Cited by 9
Quantum magnetism with ultracold bosons carrying orbital angular momentum
Pelegrí, G., Mompart, J., Ahufinger, V., & Daley, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.023615 · Cited by 5
Self-citationDensity-induced geometric frustration of ultra-cold bosons in optical lattices
Mishra, T., Greschner, S., & Santos, L. (2016) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/1209 · Cited by 9
Mixed-order transition in the antiferromagnetic quantum Ising chain in a field
Lajkó, P., & Iglói, F. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.174404 · Cited by 9
On The Discrete Spectra of Schrödinger-Type Operators on one Dimensional Lattices
Lakaev, S. N., Boltaev, A. T., & Almuratov, F. M. (2022) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s199508022206018x · Cited by 9
The Coming Decades of Quantum Simulation
Fraxanet, J., Salamon, T., & Lewenstein, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32469-7_4 · Cited by 31
Self-citationBishop, M., & Wehr, J. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-012-0480-3 · Cited by 9
Momentum-dependent pseudospin dimers of coherently coupled bosons in optical lattices
Menotti, C., Minganti, F., & Recati, A. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.033602 · Cited by 9
Itinerant ferromagnetism of two-dimensional repulsive fermions with Rabi coupling
Penna, V., & Salasnich, L. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa69fd · Cited by 9
Robustness of discrete semifluxons in closed Bose-Hubbard chains
Gallemí, A., Guilleumas, M., Martorell, J., Mayol, R., Polls, A., & Juliá-Díaz, B. (2016) · Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) · Cited by 9
Dissipative structures in optomechanical cavities
Ruiz-Rivas, J., Navarrete–Benlloch, C., Patera, G., Roldán, E., & de Valcárcel, G. J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.033850 · Cited by 9
Phases and dynamics of few fermionic impurities immersed in two-dimensional boson droplets
Pelayo, J. C., Fogarty, T., Busch, T., et al. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033219 · Cited by 8
Mistakidis, S. I., Bougas, G., Katsimiga, G. C., et al. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.123402 · Cited by 8
Bright solitons in Bose–Einstein condensates with field-induced dipole moments
Abdullaev, F. K., Gammal, A., Malomed, B. A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/7/075301 · Cited by 8
Banerjee, D., Hebenstreit, F., Jiang, F.-J., & Wiese, U. ‐. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.121104 · Cited by 8
Single-atom edgelike states via quantum interference
Pelegrí, G., Polo, J., Turpin, A., Lewenstein, M., Mompart, J., & Ahufinger, V. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.013614 · Cited by 8
Self-citationStrongly interacting two-component coupled Bose gas in optical lattices
Basak, S., & Pu, H. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.053326 · Cited by 6
“…Hamiltonian describing the dynamics of bosonic atoms is a quintessential model to probe strongly correlated many-body quantum systems [5, 30, 31] and simulate lattice spin models [1, 2, 31–39] such as quadratic-biquadratic spin model [40], or antiferromagnetic spin chains [27] and spin-1…”
InfluentialResource Theory of Heat and Work with Non-commuting Charges
Khanian, Z. B., Bera, M. N., Riera, A., Lewenstein, M., & Winter, A. (2022) · Annales Henri Poincaré · doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01254-1 · Cited by 14
Self-citationQuantized Thouless pumps protected by interactions in dimerized Rydberg tweezer arrays
Julià-Farré, S., Argüello-Luengo, J., Henriet, L., & Dauphin, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.023328 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., & Ahufinger, V.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- OpenAlex
- W2782772922
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 32.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- ultracold atoms, optical lattices, quantum simulation, quantum computing, quantum information, quantum metrology, quantum many-body systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
