Phenomenology of Illness
Abstract
The experience of illness is a universal and substantial part of human existence. Like death, illness raises important philosophical issues. But unlike death, illness, and in particular the experience of being ill, has received little philosophical attention. This may be because illness is often understood as a physiological process that falls within the domain of medical science, and is thus outside the purview of philosophy. In Phenomenology of Illness Havi Carel argues that the experience of illness has been wrongly neglected by philosophers and proposes to fill the lacuna. Phenomenology of Illness provides a distinctively philosophical account of illness. Using phenomenology, the philosophical method for first-person investigation, Carel explores how illness modifies the ill person's body, values, and world. The aim of Phenomenology of Illness is twofold: to contribute to the understanding of illness through the use of philosophy and to demonstrate the importance of illness for philosophy. Contra the philosophical tendency to resist thinking about illness, Carel proposes that illness is a philosophical tool. Through its pathologising effect, illness distances the ill person from taken for granted routines and habits and reveals aspects of human existence that normally go unnoticed. Phenomenology of Illness develops a phenomenological framework for illness and a systematic understanding of illness as a philosophical tool.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some manifestations of autism can make life inherently harder in important respects, but life being hard is not the same as it being at odds with happiness as such.
“In saying this, we do not mean to deny that some manifestations of autism can make life inherently harder in important respects; only that life being hard is not the same as it is at odds with happiness as such (Booth, 2016, Chapman, 2020;Carel, 2016).”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Carel, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Carel, H.
- Corresponding author
- Carel, Havi
- ORCID
- Carel, Havi
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W1544361543
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 22.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- illness experience, phenomenology of illness, illness, human existence, philosophy of illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review