Cited by 259Philosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Causation: A User's Guide

Paul, L. A., Hall, Ned·2013·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Causation is at once familiar and mysterious - we can detect its presence in the world, but we cannot agree on the metaphysics of the causal relation. L.A. Paul and Ned Hall guide the reader through the most important philosophical treatments of causation, and develop a broad and sophisticated understanding of the issues under debate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673445.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Paul, L. A., & Hall, N.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2013-04-25
OpenAlex
W4231896879
Cited by
259
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.55
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
causality, metaphysics of causation, causal relationship, philosophy of causation, causal theories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review