The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism
Abstract
Electoral authoritarian regimes practice authoritarianism behind the institutional facades of representative democracy. They hold multiparty elections, yet violate democratic minimum standards in systematic and profound ways. Today, they have turned into the most common form of dictatorship in the world. The Politics of Uncertainty studies their internal dynamic. Grounded in a general theory of authoritarianism, it develops a theory of regime struggles under electoral authoritarianism. Both revolve around the politics of uncertainty. All authoritarian governments, the theory posits, suffer from two forms of uncertainty. They suffer from institutional uncertainties: their hold on power is never secure. And they suffer from informational uncertainties: they can never know for sure how secure they are. They suffer these uncertainties and they try to shape them. And so do their adversaries. The politics of uncertainty comprises their twin competition over these uncertainties. It constitutes the structuring principle of regime conflicts. In electoral autocracies, it unfolds as two-level competition over electoral uncertainty. At the game level, government and opposition compete for electoral support. At the meta-level, they compete over institutional rules. In its empirical part, the book explores the politics of uncertainty contending actors pursue within the electoral arena on the basis of an original dataset on authoritarian elections worldwide. It seeks to explain governmental…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In many developing democracies, judicial autonomy remains compromised, resulting in selective law enforcement and diminishing public trust.
“Nevertheless, in many developing democracies, judicial autonomy remains compromised, resulting in selective law enforcement and diminishing public trust (Schedler, 2013).”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler, 2013
Evidence from Hungary's press restrictions and Russia's NGO laws supports Schedler's theory, showing that legal frameworks can be weaponized to erode democratic participation.
“Evidence from Hungary's press restrictions and Russia's NGO laws supports this theory, showing that legal frameworks can be weaponized to erode democratic participation.”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler (2013)
This pattern confirms Schedler's (2013) theory of manipulated democracy, where legal institutions exist in form but lack substantive independence.
“This pattern confirms Schedler's (2013) theory of manipulated democracy, where legal institutions exist in form but lack substantive independence.”
From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler (2013)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 · Cited by 1,528 · see citing works
At Home and Abroad: The Use of Denial-of-service Attacks during Elections in Nondemocratic Regimes
Lutscher, P. M., Weidmann, N. B., Roberts, M. E., Jonker, M., King, A., & Dainotti, A. (2020) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002719861676 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship
Schlumberger, O., Edel, M., Maati, A., & Saglam, K. (2024) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2023.20 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Democratic Backsliding in Africa?
(2022) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192867322.001.0001 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Inclusionary regimes, party institutionalization and redistribution under authoritarianism
Pelke, L. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1786683 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance
Rifa’i, I. J., & Abdullah, A. (2025) · Journal of Law and Social Politics · doi:10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.62
- Authors
- Schedler, A.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review