Cited by 575

The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism

Schedler, Andreas·2013

Abstract

Electoral authoritarian regimes practice authoritarianism behind the institutional facades of representative democracy. They hold multiparty elections, yet violate democratic minimum standards in systematic and profound ways. Today, they have turned into the most common form of dictatorship in the world. The Politics of Uncertainty studies their internal dynamic. Grounded in a general theory of authoritarianism, it develops a theory of regime struggles under electoral authoritarianism. Both revolve around the politics of uncertainty. All authoritarian governments, the theory posits, suffer from two forms of uncertainty. They suffer from institutional uncertainties: their hold on power is never secure. And they suffer from informational uncertainties: they can never know for sure how secure they are. They suffer these uncertainties and they try to shape them. And so do their adversaries. The politics of uncertainty comprises their twin competition over these uncertainties. It constitutes the structuring principle of regime conflicts. In electoral autocracies, it unfolds as two-level competition over electoral uncertainty. At the game level, government and opposition compete for electoral support. At the meta-level, they compete over institutional rules. In its empirical part, the book explores the politics of uncertainty contending actors pursue within the electoral arena on the basis of an original dataset on authoritarian elections worldwide. It seeks to explain governmental…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many developing democracies, judicial autonomy remains compromised, resulting in selective law enforcement and diminishing public trust.

    “Nevertheless, in many developing democracies, judicial autonomy remains compromised, resulting in selective law enforcement and diminishing public trust (Schedler, 2013).”

    From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler, 2013

  • Evidence from Hungary's press restrictions and Russia's NGO laws supports Schedler's theory, showing that legal frameworks can be weaponized to erode democratic participation.

    “Evidence from Hungary's press restrictions and Russia's NGO laws supports this theory, showing that legal frameworks can be weaponized to erode democratic participation.”

    From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler (2013)

  • This pattern confirms Schedler's (2013) theory of manipulated democracy, where legal institutions exist in form but lack substantive independence.

    “This pattern confirms Schedler's (2013) theory of manipulated democracy, where legal institutions exist in form but lack substantive independence.”

    From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as Schedler (2013)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schedler, A.
Published
2013-08-01
Cited by
575
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review