The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emotion in Interaction
Abstract
1. Introduction Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Anssi Perakyla 2. Emotion as stance Marjorie Harness Goodwin, Asta Cekaite, Charles Goodwin and Eve Tulbert 3. Distress in adult-child interaction Anthony J. Wootton 4. Facial expression and interactional regulation of Anssi Perakyla and Johanna Ruusuvuori 5. Good news, bad news, and affect: practical and temporal emotion work in everyday life Douglas W. Maynard and Jeremy Freese 6. Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen 7. Being equivocal: affective responses left unspecified Auli Hakulinen and Marja-Leena Sorjonen 8. Laughter in conversation: the case of fake laughter Markku Haakana 9. Crying and crying responses Alexa Hepburn and Jonathan Potter 10. Revealing surprise: the local ecology and the transposition of action Christian Heath, Dirk vom Lehn, Jason Cleverly and Paul Luff 11. Responding to in cognitive psychotherapy Liisa Voutilainen 12. Knowledge, empathy and in a medical encounter John Heritage and Anna Lindstrom 13. Epilogue Anssi Perakyla Appendix. Transcription and glossing conventions. References
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They extend existing findings from EM/CA research that show how emotion cannot be simplified into categories such as 'smiling is happy' (see also Peräkylä and Sorjonen 2012) or 'one needs to gaze at someone else at all times' (Rossano 2012).”
From AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies (2025) · cites this paper as Peräkylä and Sorjonen 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cowell, I., McGregor, A., O’Sullivan, P., O’Sullivan, K., Poyton, R., Schoeb, V., & Murtagh, G. (2021) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323211037651 · Cited by 22
AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies
Mlynář, J., de Rijk, L., Liesenfeld, A., Stommel, W., & Albert, S. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x · Cited by 18
“They extend existing findings from EM/CA research that show how emotion cannot be simplified into categories such as ‘smiling is happy’ (see also Peräkylä and Sorjonen 2012) or ‘one needs to gaze at some-one else at all times’ (Rossano 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Perakyla, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-09-11
- OpenAlex
- W1520896910
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- emotional labor, stance, distress, facial expressions, affect, affiliation, crying, surprise, empathy, healthcare encounters, knowledge, conversation analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
