The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Before Bioethics: A History of American Medical Ethics from the Colonial Period to the Bioethics Revolution
Abstract
Baker narrates the history of American medical ethics from its colonial origins to current bioethical controversies over abortion, AIDS, animal rights, and physician-assisted suicide. The book tracks the evolution of American medical ethics from colonial midwives and physicians' oaths, to medical society codes and bioethical principles.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient autonomy is now one of the core principles of medical ethics and law.
“Patient autonomy is now one of the core principles of medical ethics and law.19”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dembo, J., Schuklenk, U., & Reggler, J. (2018) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743718766055 · Cited by 60
Mechanisms of Techno-Moral Change: A Taxonomy and Overview
Danaher, J., & Sætra, H. S. (2023) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10397-x · Cited by 56
Moral Uncertainty in Technomoral Change: Bridging the Explanatory Gap
Nickel, P. J., Kudina, O., & van de Poel, I. (2022) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00414 · Cited by 55
Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology: Amelioration or Adaptation?
Hopster, J. K. G., & Löhr, G. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00670-3 · Cited by 45
Pistols, pills, pork and ploughs: the structure of technomoral revolutions
Hopster, J. K. G., Arora, C., Blunden, C., Eriksen, C. L., Frank, L. E., Hermann, J., Klenk, M., O’Neill, E., & Steinert, S. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2090434 · Cited by 33
Häyry, M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009104364 · Cited by 33
Holmes, B. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.005 · Cited by 30
Bioethics as a Governance Practice
Montgomery, J. (2016) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-015-0310-2 · Cited by 30
Pharmaceutical patenting and the transformation of American medical ethics
Gabriel, J. M. (2016) · The British Journal for the History of Science · doi:10.1017/s0007087416001138 · Cited by 26
The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784 · Cited by 27
Hopkins, P. D. (2021) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4 · Cited by 24
Skill, Judgement and Conduct for the First Generation of Neurosurgeons, 1900–1930
Gavrus, D. (2015) · Medical History · doi:10.1017/mdh.2015.25 · Cited by 23
The ‘Hippocratic Question’ and the Nature of theHippocratic Corpus
Craik, E. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.003 · Cited by 21
What is conceptual disruption?
Marchiori, S., & Scharp, K. A. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09749-7 · Cited by 21
6. Conceptual Disruption and the Ethics of Technology
Hopster, J. K. G., Brey, P. A. E., Klenk, M., et al. (2023) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0366.06 · Cited by 19
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice
Hopster, J. K. G. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09747-9 · Cited by 20
The Evolution of Patient Experience: From Holistic Care to Human Experience
Adams, C. A., Harrison, R., & Wolf, J. A. (2024) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1947 · Cited by 18
Disruption, technology and the question of (artificial) identity
Babushkina, D., & Votsis, A. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00110-y · Cited by 17
Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change
O’Neill, E. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00574-8 · Cited by 17
Hankinson, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.006 · Cited by 15
App Store Governance: The Implications and Limitations of Duopolistic Dominance
Cowls, J., & Morley, J. (2022) · Digital ethics lab yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09846-8_6 · Cited by 15
The Scientific Self: Reclaiming Its Place in the History of Research Ethics
Paul, H. J. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9945-8 · Cited by 15
The science fiction science method
Rahwan, I., Shariff, A., & Bonnefon, J. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09194-6 · Cited by 25
Perilli, L. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.007 · Cited by 14
Race and Bioethics: Bioethical Engagement With a Four-Letter Subject
Baker, R. (2016) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2016.1145302 · Cited by 14
Self-citationThumiger, C. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.013 · Cited by 14
Dean-Jones, L. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.012 · Cited by 11
Civility in Health Care: A Moral Imperative
Geiderman, J. M., Moskop, J. C., Marco, C. A., et al. (2022) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-022-09501-y · Cited by 9
A New Age of Patient Transparency: An Organizational Framework for Informed Consent
Campbell, K., & Parsi, K. P. (2017) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1177/1073110517703100 · Cited by 9
What is the Foundation of Medical Ethics—Common Morality, Professional Norms, or Moral Philosophy?
Holm, S. (2022) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180121000591 · Cited by 8
Caplan, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102290 · Cited by 8
Ursin, F., Müller, R., Funer, F., Liedtke, W., Renz, D., Wiertz, S., & Ranisch, R. (2024) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x · Cited by 10
Techno-moral change through solar geoengineering: How geoengineering challenges sustainability
Hofbauer, B. (2022) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0082 · Cited by 7
Emmerich, N. (2015) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-015-9628-7 · Cited by 7
Blackford, R., & Schüklenk, U. (2020) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhaa037 · Cited by 7
van de Poel, I., Hopster, J. K. G., Löhr, G., Ziliotti, E., Buijsman, S., & Brey, P. A. E. (2023) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0366.01 · Cited by 6
Revisiting the ought implies can dictum in light of disruptive medical innovation
Proost, M. D., & Segers, S. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108946 · Cited by 6
Take five? A coherentist argument why medical AI does not require a new ethical principle
Segers, S., & Proost, M. D. (2024) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-024-09676-0 · Cited by 6
The Significance of the ASBH's Code of Ethics for Healthcare Ethics Consultants
Baker, R. (2015) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1023907 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDefining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose
Anderson, J. H., Hopster, J. K. G., & Lundgren, B. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216 · Cited by 9
Schüklenk, U. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce2016273227 · Cited by 5
Berger, J. T., & Miller, D. R. (2024) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08721-x · Cited by 4
The Collective Action of Korean Physicians: A Perspective on Social Contract and Professionalism
Choi, E. K. (2024) · Korean Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.35301/ksme.2024.27.4.241 · Cited by 4
Boudon-Millot, V. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.014 · Cited by 4
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.016 · Cited by 4
Socially Disruptive Technologies, Moral Progress, and Rule Following
Lane, B. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00897-2 · Cited by 5
Leven, K.-H. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.008 · Cited by 4
The ethical concept of medicine as a profession discovery or invention?
McCullough, L. B. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105785 · Cited by 3
Histories of ‘a loathsome disease’: Sexual health in modern Britain
Hanley, A. (2022) · History Compass · doi:10.1111/hic3.12716 · Cited by 3
Witt, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.011 · Cited by 3
Philosophers' Invasion of Clinical Ethics: Historical and Personal Reflections
Baker, R. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1461464 · Cited by 3
Self-citationWhy we should talk about institutional (dis)trustworthiness and medical machine learning
Proost, M. D., & Pozzi, G. (2024) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10235-6 · Cited by 2
Roselli, A. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.009 · Cited by 2
Manetti, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.015 · Cited by 2
Baker, R., & Wynia, M. K. (2022) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01987-6_3 · Cited by 2
Self-citationStrategic Ambiguity: The Pragmatic Utopianism of Daniel Callahan’s “Bioethics as a Discipline”
Schütz, M. (2023) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180123000440 · Cited by 2
Professionalism eliminates religion as a proper tool for doctors rendering advice to patients
Schüklenk, U. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105703 · Cited by 2
Western Medicine since the Renaissance
Cantor, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.017 · Cited by 2
Jacobs, N. (2020) · Isis · doi:10.1086/712205 · Cited by 2
Jouanna, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.004 · Cited by 2
Totelin, L. M. V. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.010 · Cited by 2
Bioethics Cannot Afford to “Shut up and Dribble”
Ray, K. S., & Pérez, A. O. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1122839ar · Cited by 1
Howard, D., & McCarthy, A. M. (2026) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2025.10193 · Cited by 1
Recognizing Racism in US Bioethics as the Subject of Bioethical Concern
Galarneau, C. A. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1087204ar · Cited by 1
Genetics, Genomics and the Medical Model of Autism
Waltz, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31015-7_10 · Cited by 1
A brief history of health care ethics and clinical ethics consultation in the United States
Moskop, J. C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139058575.004 · Cited by 1
Szewczyk, K. (2019) · Diametros · doi:10.33392/diam.1231 · Cited by 1
Codification and the Origins of Physician-Patient Privilege
Wilkinson, M. (2020) · Journal of Policy History · doi:10.1017/s0898030619000289 · Cited by 1
Szewczyk, K. (2021) · Diametros · doi:10.33392/diam.1471 · Cited by 1
Robert Veatch’s Disrupted Dialogue and its implications for bioethics
McCullough, L. B. (2022) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-022-09576-1 · Cited by 1
Disrupting medical necessity: Setting an old medical ethics theme in new light
Segers, S., & Proost, M. D. (2023) · Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1177/14777509231156046 · Cited by 1
Vries, R. G. D. (2014) · The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs467 · Cited by 1
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.002 · Cited by 1
Physician Charity Care in America: Almost Always an Illusion, Ever More Commercial
White, B., & Eijkholt, M. M. (2015) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws4020201
Ethics in health care: role, history, and methods
Moskop, J. C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139058575.002
Medical Testing: Nursing, Sympathy, and Moral Code in Edith Wharton'sThe Fruit of the Tree
Slatus, K. (2017) · Edith Wharton Review · doi:10.5325/editwharrevi.33.2.0306
History and Development of Medical Ethics In the West
Campelia, G. D., & Dudzinski, D. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_1
Drei Etappen in der Entstehungsgeschichte Klinischer Ethikberatung
Bleyer, B. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58672-3_2
Pragmatische Rechtfertigung klinischer Entscheidungen – der Versuch einer Antwort
Bleyer, B. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58672-3_6
Kübler-Ross and Bioethics: A Cautionary Tale
Baker, R. (2019) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1674421
Self-citationPormann, P. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.019
Compiled by Melissa Markauskas
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.018
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.001
Pormann, P. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107705784.020
McCullough, L. B., Coverdale, J., & Chervenak, F. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316841037.004
Godwin’s Law and the Limits of Bioethics and Holocaust Studies
Bedzow, I. (2022) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01987-6_11
Pragmatic Justification of Clinical Decisions: An Attempt at a Response
Bleyer, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66819-1_6
Three Stages in the Development of Clinical Ethics Consultation
Bleyer, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66819-1_2
The Ethics of Biomedical Practitioners: A Brief Historical Introduction
Baker, R. (2023) · Collaborative bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_13
Self-citationMale Fertility-Related mHealth: Does It Create New Vulnerabilities?
Proost, M. D. (2023) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2022-0028
Addressing Discrimination and Epistemic Injustices in Bioethics and Medicine
Baker, R. P. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2388993
Self-citationMedical Ethics Before Bioethics
Emmerich, N. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26825-1_61-1
Translation of medical terms from an ethical perspective
Shi, A. (2025) · Terminology International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication · doi:10.1075/term.25003.shi
Leaving the Bedside to Mend the Bedside: Influencing Public Policy
Bruce, L. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-025-10107-y
Spiritual Care und Klinikseelsorge- Ethik: Konzepte, Methoden, Themen
Haker, H. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783112219515-003
American Medical Ethics and Jurisprudence, 1665–1957
Baker, R. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780190645083.003.14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R.
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Robert
- ORCID
- Baker, Robert
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-10-07
- OpenAlex
- W4235214219
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- zh
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Law › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- history of medical ethics, bioethics, colonial medicine, midwives, physician oath, bioethical principles, abortion, AIDS, animal rights, physician-assisted suicide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review