The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Psychologically Literate Citizen
Abstract
This book covers two timely and interconnected concepts in psychology pedagogy: psychological literacy and the psychologically literate citizen. Psychological literacy encapsulates the common graduate attributes or capabilities that students should acquire while undertaking a major in psychology, as exemplified by guidelines and lists of student learning outcomes delineated by many national psychology organizations. Although psychology educators internationally have been working toward assisting students to acquire these attributes for at least the past fifty years, only recently have educators explicitly delineated attributes and learning outcomes, and sought to develop appropriate learning, teaching and assessment strategies, including whole-program approaches. Psychological literacy thus becomes the most important outcome of undergraduate education. Psychologically literate citizens use their psychological literacy to problem-solve in an ethical and socially responsible manner in a way that directly benefits their communities. These two key concepts receive further theoretical development in this volume, and a rich variety of international perspectives is given. In addition, practical guidance is given for both the classroom psychology educator as well as the curriculum developer and reviewer. We need to create a paradigm shift in psychology education, utilizing these concepts of psychological literacy and the psychologically literate citizen.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Faculty members in psychology and related social sciences are very clear that research methods training is essential for basic science literacy (Cranney & Dunn, 2011) and to promote critical thinking (Gurung & Stoa, 2020).”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as Cranney & Dunn, 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Cranney, J., & Dunn, D.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-08-29
- OpenAlex
- W2487769263
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Education › Education, Psychology, and Social Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
- Keywords
- psychological literacy, psychology education, graduate competencies, learning outcomes, undergraduate psychology curriculum, curriculum development, assessment methods, social responsibility, ethical problem solving, community benefits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review