Cited by 70Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceCybernetics and Technology in SocietyLiterary and Philosophical Studies

Creativity and Artificial Intelligence

Boden, Margaret A.·2014·The Philosophy of Creativity

Abstract

This is a philosophical question, not a scientific one. There are many examples of AI systems whose products appear to be creative and whose processing fits the criteria of combination, exploration, or transformation. (Arguably, that’s strictly true of transformation only if the system is linked to contingencies external to the program.) But could any of them or any conceivable computer-based system “really” be creative? That raises queries about whether “real” creativity must involve autonomy, intentionality, valuation, emotion, and consciousness. The answer, in each case, is yes (sometimes with qualifications). However, these concepts are hugely controversial in themselves, quite apart from their relation to creativity—and/or to AI. It follows that no clear answer can be given to the title question. It remains open, until we have clear—and credible—accounts of all these matters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199836963.003.0012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Boden, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Boden, Margaret A.
Venue
The Philosophy of Creativity
Published
2014-05-09
Pages
224-244
OpenAlex
W248845338
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
creativity, artificial intelligence, machine creativity, autonomy, intentionality, valuation, emotions, consciousness, combinations, exploration, transformation, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review