Creativity and Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
This is a philosophical question, not a scientific one. There are many examples of AI systems whose products appear to be creative and whose processing fits the criteria of combination, exploration, or transformation. (Arguably, that’s strictly true of transformation only if the system is linked to contingencies external to the program.) But could any of them or any conceivable computer-based system “really” be creative? That raises queries about whether “real” creativity must involve autonomy, intentionality, valuation, emotion, and consciousness. The answer, in each case, is yes (sometimes with qualifications). However, these concepts are hugely controversial in themselves, quite apart from their relation to creativity—and/or to AI. It follows that no clear answer can be given to the title question. It remains open, until we have clear—and credible—accounts of all these matters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are available tools for training, keeping, and using personal LoRA models on local machines on Hugging Face.
“There are also available tools for training, keeping, and using personal LoRA models on local machines on Hugging Face 8 .”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Belenguer, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Humans as Creativity Gatekeepers: Are We Biased Against AI Creativity?
Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-023-09910-x · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Sedkaoui, S., & Benaichouba, R. (2026) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-02-2024-0129 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
He, Q., Zheng, W., Bao, H., Chen, R., & Tong, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI · doi:10.1145/3629606.3629675 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boden, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Boden, Margaret A.
- Venue
- The Philosophy of Creativity
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-05-09
- Pages
- 224-244
- OpenAlex
- W248845338
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- creativity, artificial intelligence, machine creativity, autonomy, intentionality, valuation, emotions, consciousness, combinations, exploration, transformation, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review