AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry
Open accessAbstract
A new and unorthodox approach to deal with discriminatory bias in Artificial Intelligence is needed. As it is explored in detail, the current literature is a dichotomy with studies originating from the contrasting fields of study of either philosophy and sociology or data science and programming. It is suggested that there is a need instead for an integration of both academic approaches, and needs to be machine-centric rather than human-centric applied with a deep understanding of societal and individual prejudices. This article is a novel approach developed into a framework of action: a bias impact assessment to raise awareness of bias and why, a clear set of methodologies as shown in a table comparing with the four stages of pharmaceutical trials, and a summary flowchart. Finally, this study concludes the need for a transnational independent body with enough power to guarantee the implementation of those solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 135 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
In a CV selection process using data from a male-dominated industry such as tech, the word woman was penalised with a negative or lower weight.
“One example can be when the word woman was penalised, by being given a negative or a lower weight, on a CV selection process based on the data of an industry traditionally dominated by men like the tech industry [79, 82].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [79] Shields, M.: Women's participation in Seattle's high-tech economy. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/53790/madelyn_shields_womens_participation_in_seattles_hightech_economy.pdf (2015). Accessed 15 Aug 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Swift, S.: Gender Disparities in the Tech Industry: The Effects of Gender and Stereotypicability on Perceived Environmental Fit. In: 2015 NCUR (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Philosophical and sociological studies of AI bias tend to offer either no solutions or only overly simplified single solutions.
“Whilst useful in creating debate, these tend to present either no solutions at all or overly simplified single solutions [13, 15, 19, 29, 32, 35, 56, 60, 64, 89, 96, 104].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [13] Binns, R.: Fairness in machine learning: lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 149–159. PMLR (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Boddington, P.: Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 27–37. Springer, Cham (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E.: The ethics of artificial intelligence. Camb. Handb. Artif. Intell. 1, 316–334 (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Chalmers, D.: The singularity: a philosophical analysis. In: Schneider, S. (ed.) Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, pp. 171–224. Wiley, UK (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Crawford, K.: The Atlas of AI. Yale University Press (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Müller, V.C. (Summer 2021 Edition), Zalta, E.N.: (eds.) Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/ethics-ai/. Accessed 18 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press, New York (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] O’Neil, C.: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Penguin Books Limited, New York (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Van Wynsberghe, A., Robbins, S.: Critiquing the reasons for making artificial moral agents. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25(3), 719–735 (2019) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The quality of collected data affects the quality of algorithmic decisions.
“The quality of the collected data will influence the quality of the algorithmic decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Incomplete or unrepresentative data results from historical human biases.
“The second reason, incomplete or unrepresentative data, is a consequence of the first.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The data-mining decision process tends to depend on earlier data, its outcomes, and the initial weight assigned by the programmer.
“The decision process tends to rely on previous data, its outcomes and the initial weight given by the programmer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisecitation
If data are biased, such as by racial prejudice, the outcome will likely be biased too unless suitable controls are used.
“If the data are biased with one example being prejudicial bias—racial bias being a well-documented case [2, 23], the outcome will likely follow suit unless appropriate controls are put in place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp. 77–91. PMLR (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A computer can serve as a stand-in for a human, removing moral responsibility from people.
“The computer can be used as a proxy for a human, relinquishing them of any moral responsibility [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press, New York (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biased training data can cause discrimination when the training data are missing or incomplete.
“The training data are non-existent or incomplete.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Thelisson, E., Padh, K., Celis, L.E.: Regulatory mechanisms and algorithms towards trust in AI/ML. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Melbourne, Australia (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The mathematical formulations that drive automated decisions are created by people.
“Part of the challenge of understanding algorithmic oppression is to understand that mathematical formulations to drive automated decisions are made by human beings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60, p. 14]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even an unsupervised machine-learning model using raw data may discover and reproduce discriminatory societal patterns.
“Even in an unsupervised ML model working with raw data, the machine might find discriminatory societal patterns and replicate them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Facial recognition benchmarks have been biased toward skin colour and gender.
“These benchmarks can be used in the evaluation of facial recognition systems that were biased towards skin colour and gender [23, 60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp. 77–91. PMLR (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press, New York (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Data mining can be discriminatory from the outset because it determines which data are valuable, which are not, and how much weight they receive.
“The process of data mining,4 one of the ways algorithms collect and analyse data [88], can already be discriminatory as a start, because it decides which data are of value, which is of no value and its weight—how valuable it is.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Van Wel, L., Royakkers, L.: Ethical issues in web data mining. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(2), 129–140 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
That CV selection process ended up discriminating against women.
“The outcome ended discriminating women in the selection process [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The literature on AI bias is split into two separate academic spheres: philosophical/sociological and data science/programming.
“the current literature is a dichotomy with studies originating from the contrasting fields of study of either philosophy and sociology or data science and programming”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Existing literature analysing AI bias tend to originate from one of two, very separate, academic spheres.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [13] Binns, R.: Fairness in machine learning: lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 149–159. PMLR (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Boddington, P.: Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 27–37. Springer, Cham (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E.: The ethics of artificial intelligence. Camb. Handb. Artif. Intell. 1, 316–334 (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Chalmers, D.: The singularity: a philosophical analysis. In: Schneider, S. (ed.) Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, pp. 171–224. Wiley, UK (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Crawford, K.: The Atlas of AI. Yale University Press (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Müller, V.C. (Summer 2021 Edition), Zalta, E.N.: (eds.) Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/ethics-ai/. Accessed 18 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press, New York (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] O’Neil, C.: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Penguin Books Limited, New York (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Van Wynsberghe, A., Robbins, S.: Critiquing the reasons for making artificial moral agents. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25(3), 719–735 (2019) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Biased training data can produce discriminatory machine-learning models.
“Training data that are biased can lead to discriminatory ML models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Thelisson, E., Padh, K., Celis, L.E.: Regulatory mechanisms and algorithms towards trust in AI/ML. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Melbourne, Australia (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
This elite continually develops strategies, knowingly or unknowingly, to keep others from accessing its privileges.
“This elite constantly develops strategies, either consciously or unconsciously, to prevent others from accessing their privileges [17]—and the elaboration of prejudices is one of them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Bonilla-Silva, E.: White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In 2014, Amazon began using an algorithm to choose the top five CVs from one hundred applicants.
“In 2014, Amazon started to use an algorithm to select the top five CVs from one hundred applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Vincent, J.: Amazon reportedly scraps internal AI recruiting tool that was biased against women. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-tool-bias-amazon-report (2018). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The same study found that black people who did not re-offend were twice as likely as white people to be classified as high risk.
“The same paper indicates that black people who did not re-offend were twice as likely to be classified as high risk compared to a white person as the risk score assessment in Fig. 4 indicates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Amazon's recruiting tool used applicant patterns from the prior decade and reproduced them.
“The algorithm applied the patterns in selecting individuals from the last 10 years, and it simply replicated that.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Vincent, J.: Amazon reportedly scraps internal AI recruiting tool that was biased against women. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-tool-bias-amazon-report (2018). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Defendants awaiting trial with high COMPAS risk scores are more likely to be jailed before trial than those with low scores.
“Defendants waiting for a trial with a high-risk score are more likely to be imprisoned while waiting for trial than those with low risks, so the consequences of a wrong assessment can be dire.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The private prison business model depends on having more prisoners to make more profit.
“Their business model operates on the basis of more prisoners, more profit [24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Burkhardt, B.C.: Who is in private prisons? Demographic profiles of prisoners and workers in American private prisons. Int. J. Law Crime Just. 51, 24–33 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
COMPAS predicts how likely a defendant is to re-offend violently, using up to 137 variables such as gender, age, and criminal history, each weighted.
“It predicts how likely the defendant is to re-offend by perpetrating a violent crime, taking into account up to 137 variables [61] such as gender and age and criminal history, with a specific weight given to each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Northpointe Inc.: Measurement & treatment implications of COMPAS core scales. Technical report, Northpointe Inc. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/corrections/Timothy Brenne Ph.D. Meaning and treatment implications of COMPA core scales 297495 7.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2020 (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Amazon's system learned to reproduce and strengthen discriminatory outcomes that were already normalised.
“Following those patterns, Amazon’s system learns how to reinforce those normalised discriminatory outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
COMPAS does not fully explain how it calculates risk scores, so explicability appears absent.
“Finally, this model does not fully explain how it calculated those risk scores, so explicability seems non-existent [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Minorities, especially Black people, appear to be victims of racial injustice.
“Minorities, especially from the Black community, seem to be the victims of racial injustice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A study of defendants in Broward County, Florida, found that black individuals are much more likely to be classified as high risk by COMPAS.
“However, a study of defendants in Broward County, Florida, showed that black individuals are much more likely to be classified as high risk [2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The private sector has an incentive to push for incarcerating many people from lower-class backgrounds with limited legal access, who are less likely to challenge unfair treatment.
“The private sector has an incentive to encourage incarcerating as many people from lower class backgrounds with restricted access to lawyers who are less likely to legally challenge unfair treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
COMPAS is a predictive machine-learning model that gives US courts recidivism risk scores from 0 to 10.
“Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanction, known as COMPAS, is a predictive ML model designed to provide US courts with defendants recidivism risks scores that oscillate between 0 and 10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Northpointe Inc.: Measurement & treatment implications of COMPAS core scales. Technical report, Northpointe Inc. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/corrections/Timothy Brenne Ph.D. Meaning and treatment implications of COMPA core scales 297495 7.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2020 (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Amazon's system penalised the word 'woman' and other terms indicating female gender, lowering the scores of affected CVs.
“One strategy was very straightforward by penalising the word woman. Any CV that contained this word or any others denoting the female gender of the applicant, like attending a women’s college, for example, downgraded the score, according to people familiar with the project [33, 91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Vincent, J.: Amazon reportedly scraps internal AI recruiting tool that was biased against women. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-tool-bias-amazon-report (2018). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
FairTest is a tool for testing machine-learning models that helps developers check data-driven applications for unfair outcomes.
“For example, [86], provide the FairTest, a tool designed to test the ML model, assisting developers in checking data-driven applications to detect unfairness in outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., Lin, H.: FairTest: discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 401–416. IEEE (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
When protected group data are unreliable, the resulting outcome is unreliable.
“In those cases, the protected groups’ data are unreliable, leading to an unreliable outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Equivalent safety measures do not appear to exist in the AI industry.
“Unfortunately, these safety measures do not seem to exist in the AI industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Participants may withhold information or give false information to avoid retaliation.
“The participants may be withholding or providing false information to avoid retribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Wang, S., Guo, W., Narasimhan, H., Cotter, A., Gupta, M., Jordan, M.I.: Robust optimization for fairness with noisy protected groups. arXiv:2002.09343 (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The expectation that machine-learning models would eliminate prejudice because machines perform the process is contradicted by the two case studies.
“Moreover, there was a hope that ML models would remove those prejudices as machines executed the process, but the two case studies demonstrate that the opposite is true.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Most AI trials can be run in a virtual setting, protecting the population from harm.
“The benefit of AI is that most trials can be conducted in a virtual setting protecting the population from harm [53].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] McDuff, D., Cheng, R., Kapoor, A.: Identifying bias in AI using simulation. arXiv:1810.00471 (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In male-dominated industries, some staff members tend to be wary of a more gender-balanced team.
“There is a tendency in a male-dominated industry for some members of the staff to be apprehensive of a more gender-balanced working group [5, 75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Bagilhole, B.: Being different is a very difficult row to hoe: survival strategies of women academics. In: Davies, S., Lubelska, C., Quinn, J. (eds.) Changing the Subject, pp. 15–28. Taylor & Francis, London (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [75] Sax, L.J., Lehman, K.J., Jacobs, J.A., Kanny, M.A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., Zimmerman, H.B.: Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: the evolution of women’s participation in computer science. J. Higher Educ. 88(2), 258–293 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
In the Amazon case, no explanation was available for why two candidates identical except for gender were not invited to interview.
“Finally, there is no explicability of why two candidates with the same characteristics, except gender, are not invited to the interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Pharmaceutical companies test products on different gender, ethnicity and age groups to uncover unexpected side effects.
“Pharmaceutical companies test their products on different groups based on gender, ethnicity and age, amongst other factors, to unearth unexpected side effects that might not affect other groups of the population [77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sedgwick, P.: Phases of clinical trials. BMJ 343, d6068 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Before a new medicine reaches the market, a regulator such as the US FDA or UK HMRA checks its safety as far as possible under clear guidelines.
“Every time a new medicine is launched into the market, an independent body like the US FDA or the UK HMRA makes sure it is safe, or as safe as possible, and follows a clear set of guidelines [39, 43, 74, 77].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [39] Fleming, J.G.: Drug injury compensation plans. Am. J. Comp. Law. 1, 297–323 (1982) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Hauben, M., Bate, A.: Decision support methods for the detection of adverse events in post-marketing data. Drug Discov. Today 14(7–8), 343–357 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] Santoro, M.A., Gorrie, T.M.: Ethics and the Pharmaceutical Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [77] Sedgwick, P.: Phases of clinical trials. BMJ 343, d6068 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
A single machine-learning error can have consequences in multiple countries, as with Amazon or Facebook.
“An error in an ML model can easily affect several countries in the case of Amazon or Facebook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Google images labelled images of black people with offensive, racist and incorrect remarks, sometimes as gorillas.
“For example, Google images were tagging images of black people with offensive, racist and incorrect remarks, on some occasions as gorillas [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp. 77–91. PMLR (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a healthcare system that spends less on black patients than white patients, a machine-learning model trained on that data can conclude that black patients are healthier than equally sick white patients and cut the budget accordingly.
“In a healthcare system that invests less money in black patients than white patients, the ML model feeding on that data can conclude that black patients are healthier than equally sick white patients and reduce the budget accordingly [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., Mullainathan, S.: Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366(6464), 447–453 (2019) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tramer et al. tested FairTest on Healthcare Prediction, a winning Heritage Health Competition approach, and found errors in profiling some elderly people, especially those with pre-existing conditions.
“For example, when Tramer et al. [86] tested FairTest to Healthcare Prediction, a winning approach from the Heritage Health Competition, they found out that there were errors when profiling some members of the elderly population, especially with some pre-existing health conditions [86, p. 4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86, p. 4]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
A bias-free AI cannot be achieved without an institution powerful enough to enforce compliance with guidelines.
“A bias-free AI is not achievable without an institution with enough power to guarantee compliance with those guidelines [26, 37, 70].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Campolo, A., Sanfilippo, M., Whittaker, M., Crawford, K.: AI now 2017 report. https://assets.ctfassets.net/8wprhhvnpfc0/1A9c3ZTCZa2KEYM64Wsc2a/8636557c5fb14f2b74b2be64c3ce0c78/_AI_Now_Institute_2017_Report_.pdf (2017). Accessed 7 May 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Erdélyi, O. J., Goldsmith, J.: Regulating artificial intelligence proposal for a global solution. Preprint at arXiv:2005.11072 (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] Reisman, D., Schultz, J., Crawford, K., Whittaker, M.: Algorithmic Impact Assessments: A Practical Framework for Public Agency Accountability, pp. 1–22. AI Now Institute (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recommendations by advisory bodies tend to lead to nothing because ethics and soft governance lack enforcement mechanisms beyond voluntary cooperation.
“It tends to lead to nothing, as Hagendorff [42, p. 108] asserts: “In their AI Now 2017 Report, Kate Crawford and her team state that ethics and forms of soft governance “face real challenges” [26, p. 5].”
- Also stated in: § An independent regulatory body as transnational as possible · plain
“This is mainly due to the fact that ethics has no enforcement mechanisms reaching beyond a voluntary and non-binding cooperation between ethicists and individuals working in research and industry”.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Hagendorff, T.: The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Mind. Mach. 30(1), 99–120 (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Campolo, A., Sanfilippo, M., Whittaker, M., Crawford, K.: AI now 2017 report. https://assets.ctfassets.net/8wprhhvnpfc0/1A9c3ZTCZa2KEYM64Wsc2a/8636557c5fb14f2b74b2be64c3ce0c78/_AI_Now_Institute_2017_Report_.pdf (2017). Accessed 7 May 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § An independent regulatory body as transnational as possible · plain
- Premisecitation
The UA framework is the main tool for discovering and analysing bias in the data used to train an algorithm.
“The UA framework is the primary tool to discover and analyse bias associated with the data used to train the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., Lin, H.: FairTest: discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 401–416. IEEE (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because no satisfactory explanatory factor exists, Google's image labelling is an example of an unwarranted association.
“As there is no satisfactory explanatory factor, then it is an example of an unwarranted association.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
EU legislation has advanced efforts on corruption, fiscal stability, accountability, human rights and fairness in member states that were less willing to act.
“Many laws and regulations have accelerated the fight for corruption, fiscal stability, accountability, Human Rights and fairness in members countries less willing to do so [47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Hoofnagle, C.J., van der Sloot, B., Borgesius, F.Z.: The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 28(1), 65–98 (2019) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 56
- May combine two claims. 54
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccuracy, fairness, and privacy must always be balanced against one another.
“There is always a trade-off between accuracy, fairness and privacy that needs to be taken into account as Corbett-Davies et al. [31] examined in their study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., Huq, A.: Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 797–806 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMachines take on human prejudices, acting as human proxies and shifting responsibility away.
“The machines incorporate those prejudices, becoming a proxy of humans and delegating responsibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuman bias can arise because a small elite at the top of the social hierarchy shapes and sustains society.
“Humans can be biased as it is the way society is constructed and maintained by a minority elite at the top of the hierarchy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Bonilla-Silva, E.: White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMachine-learning models may change and adapt what they produce as they receive new training data.
“Machine-learning models can have the capacity to evolve, develop and adapt their production in accordance with training information streams [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. MIT press.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo especially relevant causes of incomplete or biased data are historical human biases and incomplete or unrepresentative data.
“While there are many reasons for incomplete or biased data, two are particularly relevant: historical human biases and incomplete or unrepresentative data [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Lee, N.T., Resnick, P., Barton, G.: Algorithmic bias detection and mitigation: best practices and policies to reduce consumer harms. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenA bias impact assessment can help identify key stakeholders, their interests, their power to block or permit changes, and short- and long-term effects.
“The bias impact assessment can be very helpful in clearly identifying the main stakeholders, their interests and their position of power when blocking or allowing necessary changes and the short- and long-term impacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationData scientists and programmers treat AI biases as bugs, i.e., technical issues like security to be fixed.
“On the other hand, it is the approach by data scientists and programmers that characterise AI biases as bugs implying that it is just a technical issue like security that needs to be fixed [Tramer et al. 2016, 53, 54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tramer et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] McDuff, D., Cheng, R., Kapoor, A.: Identifying bias in AI using simulation. arXiv:1810.00471 (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(6), 1–35 (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationKearns and Roth argue that before an algorithm can be fair or private, people must agree on precise meanings that a machine can understand.
“Of course, the first challenge in asking an algorithm to be fair or private is agreeing on what those words should mean in the first place—and not in the way a lawyer or philosopher might describe them, but in so precise a manner that they can be “explained” to a machine”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49, p. 21]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiased training data can cause discrimination through prejudicial examples or through unfair valuation of under-represented groups.
“A set of prejudicial examples from which the model learns or in the case of under-represented groups which receives an incorrect or unfair valuation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Thelisson, E., Padh, K., Celis, L.E.: Regulatory mechanisms and algorithms towards trust in AI/ML. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Melbourne, Australia (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImageNet lacks geographical diversity and better represents pale-skinned populations in Western countries.
“For example, a lack geographical diversity in datasets like ImageNet (a large visual database designed for use in visual object recognition software research such as facial recognition) is an example for this type of bias [81]. This demonstrates a better representation of the pale skin population in the Western countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Suresh, H., Guttag, J.V.: A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning. arXiv:1901.10002 (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn independent regulatory body is a necessity that repeatedly appears in AI ethics discussions.
“In addition, they have adopted an independent regulatory body (US FDA, UK MHRA or EU MDA)—a necessity that keeps coming up in many AI Ethics discussions [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Erdélyi, O.J., Goldsmith, J.: Regulating Artificial Intelligence: Proposal for a Global Solution. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningData about certain groups can be absent or incorrect, as was initially true for female car drivers, who were a minority.
“Some data from specific groups’ databases can be either non-existent or simply incorrect, as was initially the case with female car drivers who were a minority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen early car safety belts and airbags were designed, they fitted tall males, and other body types, especially shorter people, were ignored, leading to a higher death rate in crashes.
“When the first safety belts and airbags for cars were designed, they suited tall males (the average engineer). Any other humans with other physical characteristics, especially shorter stature, were not considered, ending in a higher fatality rate in a car crash [18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Bose, D., Segui-Gomez, S.C.D.M., Crandall, J.R.: Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. Am. J. Public Health 101(12), 2368–2373 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSocieties are structured by an elite at the top of the hierarchy that controls power and top decision-making roles, and whose biases can become a societal standard and produce historical human biases.
“Societies, as described by Bonilla-Silva [17], are structured by an elite at the high end of the hierarchy, controlling power and the top stages in the decision-making processes (e.g. judges, senior civil servants and politicians), whose biases have the ability to be adopted as a standard across society which then lead to historical human biases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Bonilla-Silva, E.: White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPrisons and police enforcement appear to be tools for perpetuating classism and maintaining a rigid social structure, with racism as a by-product.
“Prisons and police enforcement seems to be a tool to perpetuate classism and maintain a rigid social structure, of which racism is a by-product [17, 22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Bonilla-Silva, E.: White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Brewer, R.M., Heitzeg, N.A.: The racialization of crime and punishment: criminal justice, color-blind racism, and the political economy of the prison industrial complex. Am. Behav. Sci. 51(5), 625–644 (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe statistics indicate that this is a socio-economic issue in which race plays a major role.
“However, according to the statistics, it is evident that it is a socio-economic issue in which race plays a big part.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlack adults are 33% of the US prison population but only 12% of the US adult population.
“Black adults make up 33% of US prison population while just making 12% of the US adult population [102].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Zeng, Z.: Jail Inmates in 2018, US Census Bureau, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/jail-inmates-2018. Accessed 22 June 2021 (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWomen working as programmers in IT make up 19.8% of that workforce.
“Female programmers in IT constitute only 19.8% of the total workforce [79, p. 5]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79, p. 5]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmazon removed the biased CV algorithm once bias was detected, and the company says it was never used.
“Although it was removed as soon as the bias was detected, and the company states that it was never in use, it is a good illustration of gender discriminatory outcomes as the case study will demonstrate [33, 91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Vincent, J.: Amazon reportedly scraps internal AI recruiting tool that was biased against women. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-tool-bias-amazon-report (2018). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenA COMPAS score of 8 corresponds to twice the re-offending rate of a score of 4.
“For example, an individual who scores 8 has twice the re-offending rate of those who have 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmazon has a long history of algorithmic decision-making, with users long receiving product recommendations based on earlier searches and purchases.
“It is a problematic finding because Amazon has a long history in the use of algorithmic decision-making, as users have long been recommended products based on previous searches and purchases [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(1), 76–80 (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOn December 31, 2017, private prison facilities-non-secure community corrections centres and home confinement included-held 15% of the federal prison population.
“Prison institutions in the US—private prison facilities, including non-secure community corrections centres and home confinement, held 15% of the federal prison population on December 31, 2017 [21, p. 16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21, p. 16]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is tension between fairness and the tendency to preserve the status quo, which may rest on generational prejudices against other groups.
“There is a tension between fairness, one of the key values, and the tendency to maintain the status quo, which might be based on generational held prejudices against other groups, according to Bell [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Bell, D. Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. Hachette, UK (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmazon's CV selection model penalised the word woman and favoured male applicants.
“The model ended in penalising the word woman and favouring male applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Vincent, J.: Amazon reportedly scraps internal AI recruiting tool that was biased against women. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-tool-bias-amazon-report (2018). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe assessment can help reduce bias in automated decision AI systems and support accountability.
“It can then help with how to mitigate them in the assessment of automated decision AI systems and facilitates accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe bias impact assessment accomplishes that awareness, which is why it is relevant.
“The bias impact assessment does that and hence its relevance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCOMPAS gathers historical data from earlier discriminatory court sentences and amplifies those prejudices, while also acting as a human proxy and shifting moral responsibility.
“The ML model COMPAS collects historical data from previous discriminatory court sentences and enhances those prejudices, with the added characteristic of being a proxy of a human and delegating moral responsibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe assessment can also improve understanding of complex social and historical contexts and support a practical and ethical framework for detecting possible bias.
“The assessment can also provide a better understanding of complex social and historical contexts as well as supporting a practical and ethical framework for spotting possible bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThere appears to be a power imbalance favouring a privileged white population that holds most high-ranking Justice and Police positions, which could support institutionalised racism against black people, as shown by their over-representation in prison.
“There seems to be an imbalance of power between a privileged white population that holds a majority of high-ranking positions in the Justice and Police departments, which could favour institutionalised racism over the black population,8 as figures seem to demonstrate in the case of the black population being over-represented in the prison population [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Brewer, R.M., Heitzeg, N.A.: The racialization of crime and punishment: criminal justice, color-blind racism, and the political economy of the prison industrial complex. Am. Behav. Sci. 51(5), 625–644 (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe public sector running state prisons appears willing to preserve the status quo according to the figures given.
“The public sector, operating state prisons, seems to be willing to maintain the status quo by the figures provided in point 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCOMPAS is a risk-assessment tool that supports criminal justice organisations and extends other judicial information systems.
“COMPAS is a risk-assessment tool that aids the operations of criminal justice organisations and is an extension of other judicial information systems [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSpiekermann's model follows clear steps for identifying key elements such as stakeholders, benefits, and harms, and is complemented by the EU paper's four-value approach.
“The main reason is that Spiekermann’s model follows clear steps in identifying key elements such as stakeholders, benefits and harms while being complemented by the four value approach from the High-Level Expert EU paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReisman et al. show that algorithmic impact assessment is needed as standard practice in AI.
“Reisman et al. [70, pp. 5–6] demonstrate the necessity of algorithmic impact assessment in AI as standard practice”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70, pp. 5–6]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Calvo, R.A., Peters, D., Cave, S.: Advancing impact assessment for intelligent systems. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2(2), 89–91 (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to the World Prison Brief, the US has one of the world's highest incarceration rates; in 2018 the figure was 23.4% of the total population.
“According to the World Prison Brief [100], the US has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world. In 2018, the figure was 23.4% of the total population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] World Prison Brief.: https://prisonstudies.org/country/united-states-america (2018). Accessed 22 Apr 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWomen account for only one quarter of technology industry employees.
“and make up only a quarter of employees in the technology industry [82], p. 1]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82], p. 1]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe elite gain by reinforcing their privileges, while others have limited access to well-paid jobs and colleges.
“The elite have the benefit of reinforcing privileges, and the rest of the population have limited access to progress to well-paid jobs and colleges [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Bell, D. Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. Hachette, UK (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA wrong COMPAS assessment can lead to a person who would not re-offend being jailed before trial while a more dangerous person likely to offend goes free.
“Someone can be wrongly imprisoned while awaiting trial who would not re-offend while a more dangerous individual more likely to offend would be let free (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhite defendants' COMPAS scores clustered in lower-risk categories, unlike black defendants' scores.
“These charts show that scores for white defendants tended toward lower-risk categories. Scores for black defendants did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Angwin, J., et al.: (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016). Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFairness through awareness holds that the first step to reduce or remove bias in an algorithmic model is awareness of the biases and their causes.
“The concept fairness through awareness was introduced by Dwork et al. [35], and it states that if we wish to mitigate or remove bias in an algorithmic model, the first step is to be aware of the biases and why they occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBecause eliminating bias and ensuring equal opportunity proved difficult, Amazon abandoned the system.
“It proved challenging to remove bias and guarantee equal opportunities, so Amazon decided to scrap it altogether [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTramer et al. report using FairTest to investigate and sometimes address disparate impact, offensive labelling, and uneven algorithmic error rates in four data-driven applications.
“Tramer et al. [86, pp. 1 and 2] describe their Test themselves and its use as: “We report on the use of FairTest to investigate and in some cases address disparate impact, offensive labelling, and uneven rates of algorithmic error in four data-driven applications”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86, pp. 1 and 2]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDuPont's Teflon caused environmental damage that cost the company about one billion dollars.
“For example, DuPont, a highly respected company that produced the popular material Teflon used in cooking tools, caused environmental damage that ended up costing the company around a billion dollars [78, p. 1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78, p. 1]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the Amazon case, women were the disadvantaged group, prevented from accessing jobs, which restricted their human autonomy.
“In this specific example, the disadvantaged group are the women,9 as they are blocked or impeded from accessing those jobs and limiting respect for human autonomy (financial independence).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTraining data for machine-learning models is inherently biased, like society, and tends to replicate human behaviour.
“The data used in training is intrinsically biased, as society is, and it tends to simply replicate human behaviour—one of the core aims of Artificial Intelligence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationFailing to act ethically can harm a business.
“Not doing the right thing can end up harming a business.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe AI industry resembles the pharmaceutical industry in being multidisciplinary, needing diverse voices and expertise, and having applied ethics play a central role.
“The AI industry is similar to the pharmaceutical industry in its multidisciplinary environment, its need for diverse voices and expertise, and the pivotal role that applied Ethics has played in its development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Santoro, M.A., Gorrie, T.M.: Ethics and the Pharmaceutical Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe recruitment selection process may therefore have been influenced by the system's recommendations, whether knowingly or not.
“Thus consciously, or unconsciously, affecting the selection process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmazon stated the system was never deployed but did not confirm that recruiters could not see its recommendations.
“Although Amazon said it was never implemented, it did not confirm that recruiters had no access to the machine’s recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA diverse team benefits a company by representing all voices and tailoring to their needs.
“A diverse team benefits the company in the sense that all voices are represented and their needs tailored [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Nielsen, M.W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A.W., Schiebinger, L.: Opinion: gender diversity leads to better science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(8), 1740–1742 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug made by Merck, was associated with heart attacks and strokes in long-term use and was withdrawn from the market in 2004.
“That does not mean that there are no public safety issues like the anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx produced by Merck, which was linked to heart attacks and strokes in long-term use and withdrawn from the market in 2004 [10, 74, p. 13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10, 74, p. 13]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWang et al. introduced the concept of noisy protected groups, meaning data that are corrupted, missing or unreliable because of social pressures.
“A more effective use of this concept is tested by Wang et al. [94] in their paper when introducing the idea of noisy protected groups. By “noisy protected groups”, the authors mean when data are corrupted, missing or unreliable due to social pressures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Wang, S., Guo, W., Narasimhan, H., Cotter, A., Gupta, M., Jordan, M.I.: Robust optimization for fairness with noisy protected groups. arXiv:2002.09343 (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEfforts were made to reduce the problem, but gender discrimination in Amazon's system was deeply entrenched.
“There were some attempts to ameliorate the problem, but the issue of gender discrimination was deep-rooted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Dastin, J.: Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G (2018). Accessed 24 Apr 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDrugs found unsafe or ineffective will not pass through all four phases.
“As Sedgwick [77, p. 1] assures: “Drugs under development that are found to be unsafe or ineffective will not progress through all four phases”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77, p. 1]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe AI industry appears to be following a similar path of unregulated growth that may be followed by regulation, greater awareness and mainstream acceptance, but over a shorter period.
“The AI industry seems to enjoy a similar path of unregulated growth followed, hopefully, by regulations, better awareness in the industry and by the mainstream market—although it is vying to achieve this in a shorter period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe technology industry is male-dominated, with men making up almost 75% of its workforce.
“The tech industry is male dominated, comprising almost 75% of the workforce [79, 82].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [79] Shields, M.: Women's participation in Seattle's high-tech economy. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/53790/madelyn_shields_womens_participation_in_seattles_hightech_economy.pdf (2015). Accessed 15 Aug 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Swift, S.: Gender Disparities in the Tech Industry: The Effects of Gender and Stereotypicability on Perceived Environmental Fit. In: 2015 NCUR (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn the Amazon case, fairness was lacking when a qualified candidate was denied an interview because of gender.
“Thirdly, a lack of fairness, if a candidate matching those requisites is not selected for a job interview because of their being the wrong gender.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThere appears to be no reason why technology companies cannot operate similarly to reduce bias.
“There does not appear to be any reasons why tech companies cannot conduct their businesses in a similar manner to mitigate bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe pharmaceutical industry uses data collection and comparison strategies such as randomised controlled trials, which can improve bias impact assessments by revealing unexpected outcomes.
“It also has a variety of collecting and contrasting data strategies like randomised control trials, which can help improve bias impact assessments by unearthing unexpected outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA narrower range of ideas and backgrounds may lead to lower creativity and innovation in new products.
“A less diverse source of ideas and backgrounds might result in poorer creativity and overall innovation in producing new products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Nielsen, M.W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A.W., Schiebinger, L.: Opinion: gender diversity leads to better science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(8), 1740–1742 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe main purpose of blind testing is to detect differing outcomes across groups and determine whether the reason is fair or discriminatory, as in the COMPAS case.
“The main intention, at this stage, is to detect different outcomes from different groups and determine whether there is a fair reasoning behind this or whether the outcome is discriminatory, as seen in the COMPAS case study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSide effects are typically detected and recorded through surveillance systems such as Pharmacovigilance in phase IV, and a regulatory process exists to respond.
“However, side effects are usually noticed and recorded with the assistance of surveillance and monitoring systems like Pharmacovigilance in phase IV (Hauben et al. 2009), and there is a regulatory procedure to act upon it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (Hauben et al. 2009)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBefore 1962, pharmaceutical companies were not required to run trials proving their products' safety and accuracy; the US Congress passed the Kefauver-Harris Amendments that year and Europe soon followed.
“Pharmaceutical companies were not expected to conduct trials to demonstrate the safety and accuracy of their medical products until 1962. That year, the US Congress passed the Kefauver-Harris Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetics act of 1938, and Europe followed suit soon afterwards [74, p. 12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74, p. 12]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn the Amazon case, there was no prevention of harm to self-esteem or self-value when women applied and their career development was blocked.
“In addition, there is no prevention of harm (self-esteem/self-value), if women apply for those positions and it stops their career development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPharmaceutical companies test different age, gender and other groups at different stages and compare results, helping to develop a standard method that maximises benefits and reduces harm.
“In addition, they conduct their trials on different age, gender and other characteristics groups at different stages and compare results. This process helps to develop a standard methodology to maximise benefits and remove, or minimise, harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2015, Google image recognition misidentified black people as gorillas.
“For example, in 2015, it was found that Google image misidentified black persons as gorillas [41]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Guynn, J.: Google photos labelled black people 'gorillas'. USA today. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/01/google-apologizes-after-photos-identify-black-people-as-gorillas/29567465/ (2015). Accessed 15 Mar 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegulation need not hinder innovation; pharmaceutical companies developed an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in record time.
“On the other hand, regulation does not have to affect innovation, for example, when pharmaceutical companies developed a COVID-19 vaccine utilising a cutting-edge technology, mRNA, in a record time (Kim 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (Kim 2020)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSome male tech workers prefer the status quo and may be prejudiced against women, which can make women feel unwelcome.
“Some of the male workers would prefer business as usual.10 They might be prejudiced against women and prefer the perpetuation of those values, making some women feel unwelcome in tech companies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Wajcman, J.: Feminism Confronts Technology. Penn State Press, Pennsylvania (1991)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOther male workers and female workers prefer a more gender-balanced company where everyone feels welcome and management reflects gender diversity.
“Other male workers, and the rest of the female workers, would prefer a more gender-balanced company where everybody feels welcome and the management board reflects that gender diversity [59, 101].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [59] Nielsen, M.W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A.W., Schiebinger, L.: Opinion: gender diversity leads to better science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(8), 1740–1742 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] Yasser, Q.R., Al Mamun, A., Ahmed, I.: Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: insights from Asia Pacific. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 24(3), 210–221 (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBoth case studies conclude that a bias impact assessment is needed to raise awareness of bias and its causes before deployment, and that this is urgent.
“Both case studies conclude with the necessity of applying a bias impact assessment to raise awareness of any bias and its possible reasons before being implemented as demonstrated by Dwork et al. [35]—and its urgency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical trials are standard; drugs are tested on humans only after laboratory testing, through successive phases I to IV.
“Today, clinical trials are the norm. The drugs are tested on humans only after they have undergone laboratory testing. This takes the form of a series of successive clinical trials known as phase I, phase II, phase III, and phase IV trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sedgwick, P.: Phases of clinical trials. BMJ 343, d6068 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFairTest investigates associations between application outcomes and sensitive user attributes and provides debugging capabilities to fix detected unfair effects.
“It is designed to investigate associations between application outcomes (such as prices or premiums) and sensitive user attributes (such as race or gender). Once detected, it provides debugging capabilities that help programmers solve the detected unfair effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., Lin, H.: FairTest: discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 401–416. IEEE (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhase I determines safety, phase II tests effectiveness, phase III compares effectiveness with standard treatment, and phase IV monitors risks and benefits after market release.
“Phase I trials are conducted to determine the safety of the product, phase II trials test whether the drug is effective, phase III trials will compare its effectiveness with the standard treatment available, and phase IV trials monitor any risks and benefits once the product is in the market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sedgwick, P.: Phases of clinical trials. BMJ 343, d6068 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI has life-saving potential, such as in medical imaging for cancer detection.
“AI can save lives, for example, in the case of cancer detection technologies in medical imaging [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Bi, W.L., Hosny, A., Schabath, M.B., Giger, M.L., Birkbak, N.J., Mehrtash, A., Allison, T., Arnaout, O., Abbosh, C., Dunn, I.F., Mak, R.H.: Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin 69(2), 127–157 (2019) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI is no longer confined to laboratories and is now trialled on millions of people, which makes the spread of harmful ideas especially risky.
“As Crawford [32, pp. 117–118] warns us: “The reproduction of harmful ideas is particularly dangerous now that AI has moved from being an experimental discipline used only in laboratories to being tested at scale on millions of people”.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Crawford, K.: The Atlas of AI. Yale University Press (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEffective regulation reduces harm and costs less than paying for damage and penalties later, as the DuPont example indicates.
“Finally, good regulation mitigates harm, and it is more cost-effective than trying to cover the costs of damages and fines, as the previous example of DuPont shows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work cited as [8, 55, 67] shows how bias is deeply embedded in society and hard to eliminate, a pattern mirrored in AI.
“Studies by [8, 55, 67], are potent illustrators of embedded bias in society and the difficulty of removing them which is reflected in the AI industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Bell, D. Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. Hachette, UK (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Mills, C.W.: The Racial Contract. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [67] Pateman, C.: The Sexual Contract. Wiley, Weinheim (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningResource-poor countries can use a rich country's regulatory approval as a basis for letting a medicine enter their market.
“Third world countries poor in resources can rely on the seal of approval from rich countries to allow a medicine to reach their market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regulatory approval from the FDA makes approval by other national agencies highly probable.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElderly people with pre-existing health conditions were incorrectly discriminated against, with predictions of more hospital visits and higher premiums.
“Elderly people with some pre-existing health conditions were discriminated against incorrectly, predicting more visits to the hospital, in some cases, and being charged a higher premium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86, p. 4]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGmail once deployed an algorithm for filtering spam.
“An example can be when Gmail introduced an algorithm to remove spam emails [11]—the same principle could be used to reduce fake news.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Bhuiyan, H., Ashiquzzaman, A., Juthi, T.I., Biswas, S., Ara, J.: A survey of existing e-mail spam filtering methods considering machine learning techniques. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 18(2-c)(2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMultinational firms use intricate accounting arrangements to reduce their tax payments, a practice that is spreading in the EU and US.
“as international companies devise complex accounting mechanisms to avoid paying much tax (as becoming more common in the EU and US, Bageri 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bageri 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningAI is inherently transnational because it is device-based.
“However, by its device-based nature, AI is a transnational technology, and it needs solutions applicable beyond borders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe association-guided tree construction algorithm further investigates initial findings, uses visual presentation to aid interpretation, and identifies subsets affected by algorithmic bias.
“The association-guided tree construction algorithm further investigates the findings in the first step. It introduces a visual presentation to facilitate the interpretation and identify which subsets are affected by algorithmic bias [86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., Lin, H.: FairTest: discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 401–416. IEEE (2017) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe initial AIF360 Python package implements inputs from eight published papers, more than 71 bias detection metrics, and nine bias mitigation algorithms.
“As they detailed in the paper: the initial AIF360 Python package implements inputs from 8 published papers, over 71 bias detection metrics, and 9 bias mitigation algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bellamy, R.K., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S.C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilovic, A., Nagar, S. AI fairness 360: an extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv:1810.01943 (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWoolley et al. give examples of manipulation, including political bots in Brazil and the roots of digital misinformation in Russia.
“Woolley et al. [99] provides case studies as examples such as: political bot intervention during pivotal events in Brazil or the origins of digital misinformation in Russia in which manipulation took place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Woolley, S.C., Howard, P.N. (eds.) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge technology companies such as Google and Facebook operate across national borders, and their failures have transnational consequences.
“In addition, tech companies like Google or Facebook operate beyond borders and its implications when things go wrong are transnational [99].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Woolley, S.C., Howard, P.N. (eds.) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvidence alone about past threats such as man-made climate change from the 1980s has not been enough to alter corporate and government conduct, so more proactive approaches are required.
“When scholars look back at discovering previous threats to humankind like climate change due to man-made pollution, as early as the 80s [90], they realise that providing the evidence is insufficient to modifying behaviour by companies and governments and they surmise that more pro-active strategies are needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Verdin, J., Funk, C., Senay, G., Choularton, R.: Climate science and famine early warning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360(1463), 2155–2168 (2005) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA fairness problem in one group may not appear in another, as with Simpson's Paradox; for instance, lengthy waits for cancer care are seen as unfair generally but not by people with private insurance.
“Third, instances of unfairness in one group might not translate into another group, as it is in the previously explained Simpson’s Paradox. For example, long waiting lists for a cancer treatment is considered unfair in the general population, but does not affect those with a private health insurance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The pharmaceutical industry has a long history of developing stage-by-stage risk-assessment methodologies for known and unknown risks.
“Such industries have a long history of developing risk-assessment methodologies, on a stage-by-stage basis, facing the known and the unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pharmaceutical industry has a long history of Applied Ethics.
“The pharmaceutical industry also has a long history of Applied Ethics,2 which will be explored.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pharmaceutical industry has adopted independent regulatory bodies such as the US FDA, UK MHRA, or EU MDA.
“In addition, they have adopted an independent regulatory body (US FDA, UK MHRA or EU MDA)—a necessity that keeps coming up in many AI Ethics discussions [36].”
The paper relies on this without support.
Amazon is at the forefront of algorithmic decision-making technologies.
“AI has been at the heart of their business for years and they are hence assumed to be at the forefront of such technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pharmaceutical industry's long history of applied ethics and risk-assessment methods is advantageous for finding ethical solutions.
“The pharmaceutical industry has a long history in applied Ethics and risk-assessment methodologies in a multidisciplinary field, which is advantageous in finding ethical solutions.11”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current business models do not address equal-society and protected-group concerns and cannot be legally enforced.
“All ML models affect those issues in one way or another, and the current business models do not address these concerns with no way to legally enforce them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No medicine can reach the market without a risk and safety report, regulatory approval, and follow-up monitoring.
“No medicine would be allowed to reach the market without a risk and safety report and seal of approval from the regulatory body and monitoring systems for a follow-up.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most people worldwide have smartphones and, to a lesser degree, computers.
“The majority of the global population has smartphones, and to a limited extent, computers, the damage could be extended to the whole planet.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Algorithmic recommendations influence an overworked official's decision despite the judge having final say.
“Although the judge has the final say, algorithmic recommendations affect an overworked official’s decision.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most people are not expert in or aware of these kinds of algorithmic harms.
“The majority of the population does not have the expertise or awareness in relation to these types of harms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Independent pharmaceutical regulatory bodies have developed similar guidelines.
“Those independent bodies have developed similar guidelines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regulatory approval from the FDA makes approval by other national agencies highly probable.
“For example, a medicine approved by the FDA is very likely to be approved by other national bodies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Soft-law or advisory approaches have been tried for years without much progress.
“The argument for a more advisory role, or soft law, has been practised for years with hardly any progress.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advisory bodies often phrase recommendations vaguely so as to satisfy every party.
“Recommendations by advisory bodies tend to resort to vague language to accommodate all parties’ interests.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current technology and awareness allow us at least to reduce bias, with the goal of eliminating it.
“We have now the technologies and awareness to at least mitigate, aiming to remove, bias.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI is now globally pervasive and powerful while remaining opaque.
“AI has become so ubiquitous globally and powerful in a non-transparent way that setting up an independent body is an urgent necessity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fairness and bias are understood differently by different people and lack a single definition, though some core values may be shared.
“First, the concept of fairness and bias can mean different things for different people, it lacks uniformity although some basic principles, or values as previously described, can be agreed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bias exists in PD-ai prediction models due to societal and representation barriers arising from geographical diversity in data collection.
“Bias exists in PD-ai prediction model due to societal and representation barriers that arising from geographical diversity in data collection [15].”
From Artificial intelligence bias in medical system designs: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,726 · see citing works
(2012) · Cited by 9,062 · see citing works
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · see citing works
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This a non-comprehensive list that shows some of the most common type of bias that needs to be dealt with [54] and Suresh et al.”
BackgroundAmazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403 · see citing works
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[35], and it states that if we wish to mitigate or remove bias in an algorithmic model, the first step is to be aware of the biases and why they occur.”
BackgroundWeapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whilst useful in creating debate, these tend to present either no solutions at all or overly simplified single solutions [13, 15, 19, 29, 32, 35, 56, 60, 64, 89, 96, 104].”
BackgroundMachine learning and deep learning
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2 · Cited by 2,959 · see citing works
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
Noble, S. U. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 · Cited by 2,709 · cited 4× · see citing works
“These benchmarks can be used in the evaluation of facial recognition systems that were biased towards skin colour and gender [23, 60].”
InfluentialSuperintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187536 · Cited by 1,977 · see citing works
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8 · Cited by 1,911 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It tends to lead to nothing, as Hagen-dorff [42, p. 108] asserts: “In their AI Now 2017 Report, Kate Crawford and her team state that ethics and forms of soft governance “face real challenges” [26, p. 5].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
Bi, W. L., Hosny, A., Schabath, M. B., Giger, M. L., Birkbak, N. J., Mehrtash, A., Allison, T., Arnaout, O., Abbosh, C., Dunn, I. F., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21552 · Cited by 1,846 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI can save lives, for example, in the case of cancer detection technologies in medical imaging [12].”
BackgroundCan we open the black box of AI?
Castelvecchi, D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/538020a · Cited by 1,773 · see citing works
Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilovic, A., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.01943 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model
Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Hubert, T., Simonyan, K., Sifre, L., Schmitt, S., Guez, A., Lockhart, E., Hassabis, D., Graepel, T., et al. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,310 · see citing works
Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model
Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Hubert, T., Simonyan, K., Sifre, L., Schmitt, S., Guez, A., Lockhart, E., Hassabis, D., Graepel, T., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03051-4 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4214 · Cited by 1,198 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, tech culture is global and it is an example of blocking women in IT jobs due to the masculinity of technology [92].”
BackgroundAmazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool that Showed Bias against Women *
Dastin, J. (2022) · Ethics of Data and Analytics · doi:10.1201/9781003278290-44 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
The ethics of artificial intelligence
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781685850272 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means
Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019) · Information & Communications Technology Law · doi:10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501 · Cited by 798 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many laws and regulations have accelerated the fight for corruption, fiscal stability, accountability, Human Rights and fairness in members countries less willing to do so [47].”
BackgroundSocial Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Content Production bias occurs from structural, lexical, semantic, and syntactic differences in the contents generated by users according to age and gender groups among other characteristics [63].”
BackgroundThe Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
CRAWFORD, K. (2021) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1ghv45t · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Consumer-lending discrimination in the FinTech Era
Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2022) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.047 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle
Blyth, C. R. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387 · Cited by 630 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Simpson’s paradox [14] can bias the analysis of heterogeneous data that consists of subgroups or individuals with different behavioural patterns.”
BackgroundThe Social Control of Technology
Mayne, A. J. (1982) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2634327 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Gender diversity leads to better science
Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700616114 · Cited by 557 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A diverse team benefits the company in the sense that all voices are represented and their needs tailored [59].”
BackgroundBaeza-Yates, R. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3209581 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Alpaydın, E. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13811.001.0001 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Müller, V. C., & Zalta, E. N. (2020) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Climate science and famine early warning
Verdin, J., Funk, C., Senay, G., & Choularton, R. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1754 · Cited by 312 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When scholars look back at discovering previous threats to humankind like climate change due to man-made pollution, as early as the 80s [90], they realise that providing the evidence is insufficient to modifying behaviour by companies and governments and they surmise that more pro-active strategies are needed.”
BackgroundBias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective
Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T. V., Such, J. M., Cote, M., & Criado, N. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056293 · Cited by 308 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is important to highlight that bias means a deviation from the standard and does not necessarily lead to discrimination [38, p. 1].”
BackgroundAnatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science
Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306 · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is a tendency in a male-dominated industry for some members of the staff to be apprehensive of a more genderbalanced working group [5, 75].”
BackgroundThe Ethical Algorithm: The Science of Socially Aware Algorithm Design
Kearns, M. J., & Roth, A. (2021) · Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith · doi:10.56315/pscf3-21kearns · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, to reiterate the need for machine-centric solutions, as Computer and Information Science professors Kearns and Roth [49, p. 21] note: “Of course, the first challenge in asking an algorithm to be fair or private is agreeing on what those words should mean in the first place—and not in the…”
The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis
Chalmers, D. J. (2016) · Science Fiction and Philosophy · doi:10.1002/9781118922590.ch16 · Cited by 246 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Bostrom [19, p. 131] and Chalmers [29] develops a similar strategy, although not intentionally to mitigate bias, it can apply to achieve this goal too.”
BackgroundBose, D., Segui-Gomez, S., & Crandall, J. R. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300275 · Cited by 207 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Any other humans with other physical characteristics, especially shorter stature, were not considered, ending in a higher fatality rate in a car crash [18].”
BackgroundCorporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific
Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1400 · Cited by 201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other male workers, and the rest of the female workers, would prefer a more gender-balanced company where everybody feels welcome and the management board reflects that gender diversity [59, 101].”
BackgroundTerms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence
Hoffmann, A. L. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820958725 · Cited by 185 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data ethics need to be the core principle in developing any model in AI if we want fairness in a society of free citizens all enjoying equal fundamental rights in an egalitarian economic system as Hoffmann [46, p. 1] argues.”
BackgroundFairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2017.29 · Cited by 171 · cited 5× · see citing works
“It introduces a visual presentation to facilitate the interpretation and identify which subsets are affected by algorithmic bias [86].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramèr, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.02377 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Decision support methods for the detection of adverse events in post-marketing data
Hauben, M., & Bate, A. (2009) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.12.012 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Every time a new medicine is launched into the market, an independent body like the US FDA or the UK HMRA makes sure it is safe, or as safe as possible, and follows a clear set of guidelines [39, 43, 74, 77].”
BackgroundCritiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents
van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whilst useful in creating debate, these tend to present either no solutions at all or overly simplified single solutions [13, 15, 19, 29, 32, 35, 56, 60, 64, 89, 96, 104].”
BackgroundEthical issues in web data mining
van Wel, L., & Royakkers, L. (2004) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/b:etin.0000047476.05912.3d · Cited by 143 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The process of data mining,4 one of the ways algorithms collect and analyse data [88], can already be discriminatory as a start, because it decides which data are of value, which is of no value and its weight—how valuable it is.”
MethodBrewer, R. M., & Heitzeg, N. A. (2008) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764207307745 · Cited by 139 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Prisons and police enforcement seems to be a tool to perpetuate classism and maintain a rigid social structure, of which racism is a by-product [17, 22].”
BackgroundThe Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for Engineering Ethics
Herkert, J. R., Borenstein, J., & Miller, K. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00252-y · Cited by 139 · cited 1× · see citing works
“But that was caused by the lack of adequate monitoring of Boeing by the FAA, not by ineffective or inexistent regulation [44].”
BackgroundRegulating Artificial Intelligence: Proposal for a Global Solution
Erdélyi, O. J., & Goldsmith, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278731 · Cited by 133 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It could be called International Artificial Intelligence Organization (IAIO) as suggested by Erdelyi and Goldsmith [37, p. 5], as an intergovernmental organisation, and as they say: “to serve as an international forum for discussion and engage in standard setting activities”.”
BackgroundMethodCOVID-19 vaccines: breaking record times to first-in-human trials
Kim, Y. C., Dema, B., & Reyes-Sandoval, A. (2020) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-020-0188-3 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
How should we regulate artificial intelligence?
Reed, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0360 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
(2015) · doi:10.1201/b19060 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The Case for an Ethical Black Box
Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_21 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Is Pollution Value-Maximizing? The DuPont Case
(2017) · doi:10.3386/w23866 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Creativity and Artificial Intelligence
Boden, M. A. (2014) · The Philosophy of Creativity · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199836963.003.0012 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The Distortive Effects of Antitrust Fines Based on Revenue
Bageri, V., Katsoulacos, Y., & Spagnolo, G. (2013) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12079 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the percentage needs to be calculated on the turnover, rather than profit or the amount of tax paid, as international companies devise complex accounting mechanisms to avoid paying much tax (as becoming more common in the EU and US, Bageri 2013).”
BackgroundFair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future ChallengesPreprint
Tolan, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04730 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsPreprint
Wang, S., Guo, W., Narasimhan, H., Cotter, A., Gupta, M. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.09343 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Ethics and the Pharmaceutical Industry
Santoro, M. A., & Gorrie, T. M. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610769 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Advancing impact assessment for intelligent systems
Calvo, R. A., Peters, D., & Cave, S. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0151-z · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“] scientific and policy experts have been developing on the topic of algorithmic accountability” (also see [25]).”
BackgroundSedgwick, P. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6068 · Cited by 31 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Every time a new medicine is launched into the market, an independent body like the US FDA or the UK HMRA makes sure it is safe, or as safe as possible, and follows a clear set of guidelines [39, 43, 74, 77].”
BackgroundWho is in private prisons? Demographic profiles of prisoners and workers in American private prisons
Burkhardt, B. C. (2017) · International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.04.004 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their business model operates on the basis of more prisoners, more profit [24].”
BackgroundBeing Different is a Very Difficult Row to Hoe: Survival Strategies of Women Academics
Bagilhole, B. (2017) · Changing the Subject · doi:10.4324/9781315095899-3 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is a tendency in a male-dominated industry for some members of the staff to be apprehensive of a more genderbalanced working group [5, 75].”
BackgroundThe Agile Deployment of Machine Learning Models in Healthcare
Jackson, S. R., Yaqub, M., & Li, C.-X. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2018.00007 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Identifying Bias in AI using SimulationPreprint
McDuff, D., Cheng, R., & Kapoor, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.00471 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Does AI Raise Any Distinctive Ethical Questions?
Boddington, P. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4_3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Bias, Fairness, and Accountability with AI and ML AlgorithmsPreprint
Zhou, N., Zhang, Z., Nair, V. N., Singhal, H., Chen, J., & Sudjianto, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.06558 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Drug Injury Compensation Plans
Fleming, J. G. (1982) · The American Journal of Comparative Law · doi:10.2307/839631 · Cited by 6 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Every time a new medicine is launched into the market, an independent body like the US FDA or the UK HMRA makes sure it is safe, or as safe as possible, and follows a clear set of guidelines [39, 43, 74, 77].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Anderson, J., Rainie, L., Luchsinger, A.: Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Pew Res. Center 10, 12 (2018)
- Barocas, S., Selbst, A.D.: Big data’s disparate impact. Calif. L. Rev. 104, 671 (2016)
- Binns, R.: Fairness in machine learning: lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 149–159. PMLR (2018)
- Bronson, J., Carson, E.A.: Prisoners in 2017. Age 500, 400 (2019)
- Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp. 77–91. PMLR (2018)
- Erdélyi, O. J., Goldsmith, J.: Regulating artificial intelligence proposal for a global solution. Preprint at arXiv:2005.11072 (2020) · arXiv
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)
- Lee, N.T., Resnick, P., Barton, G.: Algorithmic bias detection and mitigation: best practices and policies to reduce consumer harms. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC (2019)
- Mills, C.W.: The Racial Contract. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2014)
- Nabirahni, D.M., Evans, B.R., Persaud, A.: Al-Khwarizmi (algorithm) and the development of algebra. Math. Teach. Res. J. 11(1–2), 13–17 (2019)
- Pateman, C.: The Sexual Contract. Wiley, Weinheim (2018)
- Reisman, D., Schultz, J., Crawford, K., Whittaker, M.: Algorithmic Impact Assessments: A Practical Framework for Public Agency Accountability, pp. 1–22. AI Now Institute (2018)
- Suresh, H., Guttag, J.V.: A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning. arXiv:1901.10002 (2019) · arXiv
- Thelisson, E., Padh, K., Celis, L.E.: Regulatory mechanisms and algorithms towards trust in AI/ML. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Melbourne, Australia (2017)
- Washington, A.L.: How to argue with an algorithm: lessons from the COMPAS-ProPublica debate. Colo. Tech. LJ 17, 131 (2018)
- Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., Cave, S.: Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research. Nuffield Foundation, London (2019)
- Woolley, S.C., Howard, P.N. (eds.) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, F., Wang, L., Hong, J., Jiang, J., & Zhou, L. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae060 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in the field of pharmacy practice: A literature review
Chalasani, S. H., Syed, J. M., Ramesh, M., Patil, V., & Kumar, T. M. P. (2023) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100346 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
“98 Minorities, for example, may be under-represented in datasets due to racial biases in dataset creation, resulting in lower-than-expected prediction performance.”
BackgroundUnderstanding and Mitigating Bias in Imaging Artificial Intelligence
Tejani, A. S., Ng, Y. S., Xi, Y., & Rayan, J. C. (2024) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.230067 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development
Fu, C., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101248 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“A predictive study in 2022 concluded that by heavily investing in AI, the pharmaceutical industry could see a return on investment increase of more than 45% [81].”
Ethical considerations on artificial intelligence in dentistry: A framework and checklist
Rokhshad, R., Ducret, M., Chaurasia, A., Karteva, T., Radenković, M., Roganović, J., Hamdan, M. H., Mohammad‐Rahimi, H., Krois, J., Lahoud, P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104593 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Tasci, E., Zhuge, Y., Camphausen, K., & Krauze, A. V. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14122897 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Graafsma, J., Murphy, R. M., van de Garde, E. M. W., Karapinar‐Çarkit, F., Derijks, H. J., Hoge, R. H. L., Klopotowska, J. E., & van den Bemt, P. M. L. A. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae076 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development
Mak, K., Wong, Y.-H., & Pichika, M. R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35529-5_92 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Ayana, G., Dese, K., Nemomssa, H. D., Habtamu, B., Garcia, B. R. M., Badu, K., Yamba, E. I., Faye, S. L., Ondua, M., Nsagha, D. S., et al. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.231994 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“Scholars and activists began advocating for the recognition and empowerment of marginalized communities in AI decision-making processes, as well as the incorporation of diverse perspectives and values into AI design and deployment [4].”
BackgroundInfluentialHasan, H. E., Jaber, D., Khabour, O. F., & Alzoubi, K. H. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01062-8 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“Such an act may be the result of a biased algorithmic system in the pharmaceutical market, and the absence of legally binding regulations in such a situation would harm consumers [21].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development
Mak, K., Wong, Y.-H., & Pichika, M. R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73317-9_92-1 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Applications to Measure Food and Nutrient Intakes: Scoping Review
Zheng, J., Wang, J., Shen, J., & An, R. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54557 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“It is also worth noting that AI systems while reducing human biases, introduce computational biases that may arise from algorithmic designs or training datasets [43,44].”
Mitigating the risk of artificial intelligence bias in cardiovascular care
Mihan, A., Pandey, A., & Spall, H. G. C. V. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00155-9 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Toderaş, M. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17178049 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Zafar, A. (2024) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-024-00121-8 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“For instance, although the impact of bias in court precedents may diminish over time through progressive judicial decisions and legislative reforms, AI systems that base their judgments exclusively on historical data risk replicating outdated patterns of discrimination [105].”
Artificial intelligence bias in medical system designs: a systematic review
Kumar, A., Aelgani, V., Vohra, R., Gupta, S. K., Bhagawati, M., Paul, S., Saba, L., Suri, N., Khanna, N. N., Laird, J. R., et al. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-16029-x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
AI-driven innovations in pharmaceuticals: optimizing drug discovery and industry operations
Saini, J. P. S., Thakur, A., & Yadav, D. (2025) · RSC Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1039/d4pm00323c · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The impact of artificial intelligence on research efficiency
Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104743 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
AI Advancements: Comparison of Innovative Techniques
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5010003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“To avoid prejudice and respect human values, one needs to adhere to ethical frameworks and rules while also making an effort to reduce bias and promote justice.”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence bias in the prediction and detection of cardiovascular disease
Mihan, A., Pandey, A., & Van Spall, H. G. C. (2024) · npj Cardiovascular Health · doi:10.1038/s44325-024-00031-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Evaluation bias may occur if inappropriate metrics are used to assess algorithm performance 32 .”
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Kordzadeh, N. (2024) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.103921 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Aure, P. A., & Cuenca, O. (2024) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-03-2024-0076 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DECISION MAKING: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
Balbaa, M. E., & Abdurashidova, M. S. (2024) · EPRA International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies · doi:10.36713/epra15747 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Towards evidence-based practice 2.0: leveraging artificial intelligence in healthcare
Nilsen, P., Sundemo, D., Heintz, F., Neher, M., Nygren, J., Svedberg, P., & Petersson, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2024.1368030 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“For example, the input or output of an AI application may necessitate human judgement, such as a clinician determining what data should be used in the application (61).”
BackgroundKayyali, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2373-0.ch007 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Ethical Considerations in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Innovation and Social Values
Hastuti, R., & Syafruddin, S. (2023) · West Science Social and Humanities Studies · doi:10.58812/wsshs.v1i02.191 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Vaccine development using artificial intelligence and machine learning: A review
Asediya, V., Anjaria, P. A., Mathakiya, R. A., KORINGA, P. G., Nayak, J. B., Bisht, D., Fulmali, D., Patel, V. A., & Desai, D. N. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136643 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Farah, L., Borget, I., Martelli, N., & Vallée, A. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/51514 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Identifying and mitigating potential risks, such as algorithmic bias, data privacy breaches, and algorithm failures, is essential to protect patient well-being and maintain trust in these innovative technologies [41].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence bias auditing – current approaches, challenges and lessons from practice
Lacmanović, S., & Škare, M. (2025) · Review of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1108/raf-01-2025-0006 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The human role to guarantee an ethical AI in healthcare: a five-facts approach
Iniesta, R. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00353-x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Belenguer [94] suggests a full pipeline to deal with discriminatory bias in Artificial Intelligence inspired on the clinical trials testing-phases methodology.”
Data Ownership in the AI-Powered Integrative Health Care Landscape
Liu, S., & Guo, L. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/57754 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Navigating Bias and Fairness in Digital AI Systems
Tariq, M. U. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4147-6.ch006 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles
Guillen-Aguinaga, M., Aguinaga-Ontoso, E., Guillen-Aguinaga, L., Guillen-Grima, F., & Aguinaga-Ontoso, I. (2025) · Data · doi:10.3390/data10120201 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A step toward building a unified framework for managing AI bias
Rana, S. A., Azizul, Z. H., & Awan, A. A. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1630 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“The ideals of fairness are incompatible with the operationalisation of the “ from equality to equity ” concept ( Fenwick & Molnar, 2022 ), which necessitates approaching the issue from an operational war posture ( Belenguer, 2022 ).”
BackgroundAutomated diagnosis of autism with artificial intelligence: State of the art
Valizadeh, A., Moassefi, M., Nakhostin-Ansari, A., Some’eh, S. H., Hosseini-Asl, S. H., Torbati, M. S., Aghajani, R., Ghorbani, Z. M., Oskouie, I. M., Aghajani, F., et al. (2023) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2023-0050 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A systematic review of AI-driven business models for advancing Sustainable Development Goals
Khan, M. A., Rahman, A., Mahmud, F. U., Bishnu, K. K., Ahmed, M., Mridha, M. F., & Aung, Z. (2025) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2025.100539 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Igbinovia, M. O., & Mensah Danquah, M. (2025) · Technical Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07317131.2025.2512282 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“In making decisions, there can be some form of biases that can be seen by the AI algorithm known as AI bias, machine learning bias, or AI algorithm bias (Belenguer, 2022; Kordzadeh & Ghasemaghaei, 2022; Mehrabi et al., 2021).”
Embracing the changes and challenges with modern early drug discovery
Kumar, V., & Roy, K. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2025.2481259 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Additionally, clinical trials for new drugs often lack sufficient representation of minority groups, which can result in an incomplete understanding of how these drugs will perform across diverse populations [94].”
Hughes, K. D., Konnikov, A., Denier, N., & Hu, Y. (2025) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267251403902 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Second, we identify a recurring tendency in CS to focus on ‘debiasing’ while looking to other disciplines for guidance on issues of justice, fairness, and equality in hiring (Chen, 2023a; De Cremer and De Schutter, 2021), or alternatively to delegate such issues away (Belenguer, 2022).”
Simpson, M. D., & Qasim, H. S. (2025) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy13020041 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“In order to minimise these biases, a comprehensive strategy is required, including the use of a broad and representative training dataset, the design of transparent algorithms, and ongoing monitoring of biases [99].”
Kumari, V., Kumar, N., Sampath Kumar, K., Kumar, A., Sanagala, S. S., Saxena, S., Khanna, N. N., Laird, J. R., Singh, N., Fouda, M. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · doi:10.3390/jcdd10120485 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Basikabio, P. M. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202309.0562.v1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wearable Biosensing and Machine Learning for Data-Driven Training and Coaching Support
Madrigal-Cerezo, R., Sanz, N. D., & Martín-Rodríguez, A. (2026) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios16020097 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“However, algorithmic supervision, validation, and final judgment must remain human responsibilities [167,168].”
Perdana, A., Arifin, S., & Quadrianto, N. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102838 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
AI-based malware detection in IoT networks within smart cities: A survey
Alhamdi, M. J. M., López-Guede, J. M., AlQaryouti, J., Rahebi, J., Zulueta, E., & Fernández‐Gámiz, U. (2025) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108055 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Storozhyk, M. (2024) · Futurity Philosophy. · doi:10.57125/fp.2024.03.30.02 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
New evidence-based practice: Artificial intelligence as a barrier breaker
Ferreira, R. M. (2023) · World Journal of Methodology · doi:10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.384 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing
Nwebonyi, N., & McKay, F. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01112-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This is because bias has generally been theorised in the medical sciences, social sciences and humanities either as systematic error or by the inequalities it produces [6, 7, 16–20].”
BackgroundConsiderations for the application of artificial intelligence in vascular surgical education
Rigberg, D. A., & Jim, J. (2023) · Seminars in Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.07.004 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Sedeeq, F. S., & Arman, P. (2025) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2025.10175 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…(Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) algorithm, in which a risk assessment tool used in the US criminal justice system was found to be racially biased, disproportionately predicting recidivism for Black defendants, 70 the demand for such a board remains high.”
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.001.0001 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: A Deuteragonistic Role?
Wohlfarth, B., Streit, S. R., & Guttormsen, S. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.45513 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“This may include racial, sexual, or religious bias, making the results less inclusive [28-30] (integrity - ).”
Wang, T., Emami, E., Jafarpour, D., Tolentino, R., Gore, G. C., & Rahimi, S. A. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000941 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Similarly, Belenguer [60] put forward a structured framework for action, which includes four key stages: testing in a closed environment, testing in an open environment, bias impact assessment, i.e., assessing values such as respect for human autonomy, prevention of harm, fairness, and…”
Bias analysis of AI models for undergraduate student admissions
Busum, K. V., & Fang, S. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10762-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Complicating this understanding is the gap in the literature between technical studies (which include jargon) and descriptive studies (aimed at the lay-person) on algorithmic fairness in higher education [23, 24], showing a need for scholarly work which bridges these disciplines.”
Fairness Concerns in App Reviews: A Study on AI-Based Mobile Apps
Nasab, A. R., Dashti, M., Shahin, M., Zahedi, M., Khalajzadeh, H., Arora, C., & Liang, P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3690633 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Section 8 outlines the threats to validity, and Section 9 concludes this work.”
BackgroundLatest breakthroughs, research results, and challenges in intelligent control of autonomous vehicles
Achenef, T. B., Abera, S. N., Admas, Y. A., & Tegegne, S. Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · doi:10.1177/09544070251327616 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ethical Implications of AI-Powered Communication Tool
Pandey, A. S., Sharma, Y., Tiwari, A., Chauhan, R., Tyagi, S., & Kumari, J. (2024) · International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE) · doi:10.1109/ic3se62002.2024.10593350 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ayana, G., Dese, K., Daba, H., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4652444 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI): Reflections on Judicial System
Chaudhary, G. (2024) · Kutafin Law Review · doi:10.17803/2713-0533.2023.4.26.872-889 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Vindigni, G. (2025) · European Journal of Applied Science Engineering and Technology · doi:10.59324/ejaset.2025.3(3).06 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Artificial intelligence systems are neither epistemically neutral instruments nor value-free amplifiers, but mechanisms for reflecting and intensifying algorithmically sanctioned biases inherent in the underlying training datasets [126].”
The Art and Science of User Engagement
Behare, N., & Jeet, D. (2024) · Advances in multimedia and interactive technologies book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0116-6.ch009 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dwivedi, D. N., & Mahanty, G. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2964-1.ch012 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
AI in Governance and Policy Making
Saxena, A. K. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr24519015426 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Possible benefits, challenges, pitfalls, and future perspective of using ChatGPT in pathology
Aden, D., Zaheer, S., & Khan, S. Q. (2024) · Revista Española de Patología · doi:10.1016/j.patol.2024.04.003 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Adams, J. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02398-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Although biases in one sense require consistency, being ‘systematic’ in relation to training data as opposed to sys-tem malfunctions, it clearly frustrates the goal of consistency when model outputs vary across populations (Belenguer 2022).”
Artificial Intelligence and Fair Trial Rights
Molbæk-Steensig, H., & Quemy, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0018 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yalamati, S., & Vaddy, R. K. (2024) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2909-2.ch003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Dwivedi, D. N., & Mahanty, G. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0724-3.ch012 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Managing Artificial Intelligence Algorithmic Discrimination: The Internal Audit Function Role
Nzama, L. (2023) · Accounting, finance, sustainability, governance & fraud · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-6327-0_14 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Freedom of Expression
Gregorio, G. D., & Dunn, P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0005 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Accounting: Ethical Challenges and Legal Perspectives
Perdana, A., Wang, T., & Arifin, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46209-2_11 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Reshaping the Digital Economy with Big Data: A Meta-Analysis of Trends and Technological Evolution
Căpuşneanu, S., Barbu, C. M., Solomon, A.-G., & Rakoș, I.-S. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14132709 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights at Work
Atkinson, J., & Collins, P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0025 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Interactive Mitigation of Biases in Machine Learning Models for Undergraduate Student Admissions
Busum, K. V., & Fang, S. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6070152 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Artificial neural network to predict post-operative hypocalcemia following total thyroidectomy
Rao, K. N., Arora, R. D., Rajguru, R., & Nagarkar, N. M. (2024) · Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1007/s12070-024-04608-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Another primary concern is the potential for bias and dis - crimination within AI algorithms, which can result from the biases of the developers, the training data, or the technol - ogy users [20].”
Saiyed, S., & Kumar, V. (2025) · Strategic Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.sbr.2025.100018 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Embedding machine learning based toxicity models within radiotherapy treatment plan optimization
Maragno, D., Buti, G., Birbil, Ş. İ., Liao, Z. X., Bortfeld, T. R., den Hertog, D., & Ajdari, A. (2024) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad2d7e · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Destination (Un)Known: Auditing Bias and Fairness in LLM-Based Travel Recommendations
Andreev, H., Kosmas, P., Livieratos, A. D., Theocharous, A., & Zopiatis, A. (2025) · Applied Informatics · doi:10.3390/ai6090236 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Under-represented groups receive poorer model performance and less relevant recommendations [26–28].”
Be AIware! An AI Competency Model for K-12 Education
Sattelmaier, L., & Pawlowski, J. Μ. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101838 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bridging digital and knowledge divides: Concepts, frameworks and ethical concerns
Kuiler, E. W. (2024) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.400 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rahaman, M., Pappachan, P., Orozco, S. M., Bansal, S., & Arya, V. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3860-5.ch011 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Using Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Strategies
Damaševičius, R., Maskeliūnas, R., & Misra, S. (2023) · Springer optimization and its applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33183-1_10 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and the Right to a Healthy Environment
Quintavalla, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0028 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Powered Translation
Asrifan, A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0060-3.ch012 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bridging fair-aware artificial intelligence and co-creation for equitable mental healthcare
Timmons, A. C., Duong, J. B., Walters, S. N., Carta, K. E., Jumonville, G. A., Carrasco, A. S., Romero, D., Ahle, M. W., Comer, J. S., Khurd, I. P., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00491-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, systematic errors in the datasets and the models used to train AI systems might ultimately yield biased applications 12–15 .”
Artificial Intelligence Human Rights Impact Assessment
Ortalda, A., & Hert, P. D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0035 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Don’t Leave Artificial Intelligence Alone: It Could Hurt Human Rights
Özdan, S. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_12 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ratana, R., Sharifzadeh, H., & Krishnan, J. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01700-6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Structural oppression and AI: A systematic review of data policy frameworks in India
Biju, P. R., & Gayathri, O. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124415 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Towards explainable artificial intelligence: history, present scenarios, and future trends
Okoro, E. M., Umagba, A. O., Abara, B. A., Isa, Z. S., & Buhari, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95315-3.00006-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Quintavalla, A., & Temperman, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0037 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Quintavalla, A., & Temperman, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Unleashing the Power of OpenAI in Shaping the Future of Cancer Research
Abdullah, R. M., Masseh, H. D. I., Salihi, A. B., & Faraj, B. M. (2023) · BioMed Target Journal · doi:10.59786/bmtj.112 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Faye, S. L., Nkweteyim, D. L., Sow, G. H. C., Diop, B., Diongue, F. B., Cissé, B., Dickson, N. S., Dia, N., Badu, K., Ayana, G., et al. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00779-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“This could be due to prejudiced assumptions while developing the model or non-representa - tive, inaccurate, or simply incorrect training data [ 27].”
Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector in Norway:
Corneliussen, H. G., Seddighi, G., Iqbal, A., et al. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53770-7_11 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
AI Life Cycle and Human Rights
Martina, Š., Luboš, K., & Drchal, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780192882486.003.0002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Belenguer, L.
- Corresponding author
- Belenguer, Lorenzo
- ORCID
- Belenguer, Lorenzo
- Venue
- AI and Ethics
- Published
- 2022-02-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-787
- ISSN
- 2730-5953 (ISSN-L)
- 2730-5961
- PMC
- PMC8830968
- OpenAlex
- W4211155626
- Semantic Scholar
- 2db0876940068279e829854a498337ddff796432
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 63.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AI and Ethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- No funding was received
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, algorithmic decision-making, drug trials, social prejudice, independent oversight bodies, AI ethics framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review