The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction
Abstract
Abstract This book introduces a new linguistic reconstruction of the phonology, morphology, and lexicon of Old Chinese, the first Sino-Tibetan language to be reduced to writing. It is the language of the earliest Chinese classical texts (1st millennium BCE) and the ancestor of later varieties of Chinese, including all modern Chinese dialects. Although the reconstruction has its basis in earlier research, it moves beyond earlier reconstructions by taking into account important new evidence that has recently become available: better documentation of Chinese dialects that preserve archaic features, like the Mĭn and Wăxiāng dialects; better documentation of languages with very early loanwords from Chinese, like the Hmong-Mien, Tai-Kadai and Vietnamese languages; and a flood of previously unknown Chinese manuscripts from the first millennium BCE, excavated or discovered in the last several decades. The book also relies on, and extends, recent advances in our understanding of the derivational processes that connected different words coming from the same root. By making systematic use of evidence from archaic Chinese dialects and layers of loanwords into languages in contact, it brings Old Chinese reconstruction more in line with standard reconstruction practice. In addition, the book expands our knowledge of Chinese etymoloy and for the first time identifies phonological markers of pre-Han dialects, such as the development of *r to -j in a group of east coast dialects, but to -n elsewhere.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the role of irrigation systems and the redesigned survival of the 'well field' ( jingtian 井田 ) system for the rise of private property [15];”
From GERHARD SCHMITT (1933–2017) (2018) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vocalisation in Group Writing: A New Proposal
Kilani, M. (2019) · Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica · doi:10.37011/studmon.20 · Cited by 12
Establishing the text of the Odes: the Anhui University bamboo manuscript
Smith, A., & Poli, M. (2021) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x22000015 · Cited by 9
A SELF-REFLEXIVE PRAXIS: CHANGING ATTITUDES TOWARDS MANUSCRIPT AND TEXT IN EARLY CHINA
Krijgsman, R. (2019) · Early China · doi:10.1017/eac.2019.2 · Cited by 4
Behr, W. (2018) · Early China · doi:10.1017/eac.2018.2 · Cited by 3
Parallel Planetary Astrologies in Medieval China and Inner Asia
Pankenier, D. W. (2020) · International Journal of Divination and Prognostication · doi:10.1163/25899201-12340008 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, W. H., & Sagart, L.
- ORCID
- Sagart, Laurent
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- OpenAlex
- W567727333
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- Old Chinese, language reconstruction, Sino-Tibetan languages, phonology, morphology (linguistics), vocabulary, Chinese classics, Chinese dialects, Min dialects, loanwords, Hmong-Mien languages, Tai-Kadai languages, Vietnamese language, Chinese etymology, derivational morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review