Cited by 12Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyLinguistics and language evolutionLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

Vocalisation in Group Writing: A New Proposal

Open access
Kilani, Marwan·2019·Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica

Abstract

The so-called group writing or syllabic orthography is a special orthography used in Egyptian hieroglyphic texts starting from the New Kingdom/Late Bronze Age. The nature and function of this orthography, especially the way it notates vowels, has been a topic of debate for more than a century, without any consensus being reached. In this book, Marwan Kilani presents a new interpretative model that provides a fresh explanation of how the syllabic orthography notates vowels. The author starts from a critical reanalysis of previous suggestions and from a thorough reassessment of the evidence. He then infers the functioning of the system by comparing the group writing spelling of Late Egyptian words surviving in Coptic with the reconstructions of their vocalizations. This approach leads to the recognition of a system that not only coherently explains all the spellings attested in the corpus, but which also produces interpretations of the spellings in group writing that agree with current reconstructions of the Egyptian vocalization. The book contains indexes and an Appendix listing the words analysed in the study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37011/studmon.20

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Černý, J. 1939. Late Ramesside Letters. Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca 9. Bruxelles: Édition de la Fondation égyptologique reine Élisabeth.
  2. Černý, J., and A.H.S. Gardiner. 1957. Hieratic Ostraca. Vol. 1. Oxford: Printed for the Griffith Institute at the University Press by Charles Batey.
  3. Chen, S.-F. 2000. "A Study of Sanskrit Loanwords in Chinese." Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 30 3: 375-426.
  4. Fischer-Elfert, H.-W. 1992. Die satirische Streitschrift des Papyrus Anastasi I.: Textzusammenstellung. 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  5. Gardiner, A.H. 1948. Ramesside Administrative Documents. London: Published on behalf of the Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford by Oxford University Press.
  6. Helck, W. 1971. Die Beziehungen Ägyptens zu Vorderasien im 3. und 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. 2nd edition. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  7. Junge, F. 2005. Late Egyptian Grammar: an Introduction. 2nd edition. Griffith Institute Publications. Oxford: Griffith Institute.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilani, M.
Corresponding author
Kilani, Marwan
Venue
Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica
Published
2019
ISSN
0946-8641 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996092306
Cited by
12
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lingua Aegyptia. Studia monographica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (10BP12_187039)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Keywords
collective writing, Late Egyptian, Coptic, Late Bronze Age, New Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review