The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents
Abstract
The main focus of this book about social ontology is collective intentionality (as expressed by joint intentions, wants, beliefs, and action) and group agency. The book gives the first full-blown theory of group reasons in the sense of members' participatory reasons as distinguished from a group agent's reasons for action.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation
Szanto, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02002 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuomela, R.
- Corresponding author
- Tuomela, Raimo
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- OpenAlex
- W4213418540
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- social ontology, collective intentionality, collective agency, i-mode, joint action, corporations, state, group solidarity, intergroup cooperation, intergroup conflict, external authority
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
