Cited by 89Archaeological and Geological StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Sticks, Stones, and Broken Bones: Neolithic Violence in a European Perspective

·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

This book presents an up-to-date overview of the evidence for violent injuries on human skeletons of the Neolithic period in Europe, ranging from 6700 to 2000 bc. Unlike other lines of evidence — weapons, fortifications, and imagery — the human skeleton preserves the actual marks of past violent encounters. The chapters present evidence from eleven European countries which provide, for the first time, the basis for a comparative approach between different regions and periods. Difficulties and ambiguities in interpreting the evidence are also discussed, although many of the cases are clearly the outcome of conflict. Injuries often show healing, but others can be seen as the cause of death. In many parts of Europe, women and children appear to have been the victims of violence as often as adult men. The book presents a starting point for a new consideration of the prevalence and significance of violence in Neolithic Europe, and provides a baseline for comparisons with both earlier and later periods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199573066.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Neolithic period is increasingly recognised as one marked by conflict and instability, driven by profound social and demographic transformations linked to the shift from foraging to farming.

    “This period is increasingly recognised as one marked by conflict and instability, driven by profound social and demographic transformations linked to the shift from foraging to farming.”
  • High population pressure, competition over resources, and interactions between indigenous Mesolithic groups and incoming Neolithic farming communities often resulted in violent confrontations of varying scale.

    “High population pressure, competition over resources, and interactions between indigenous Mesolithic groups and incoming Neolithic farming communities often resulted in violent confrontations of varying scale59,60]65–68.”
  • Endemic conflict is now recognised as a defining feature of early European farming societies.

    “Despite these limitations, endemic conflict is now recognised as a defining feature of early European farming societies65.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-04-19
OpenAlex
W19528747
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.47
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Neolithic Europe, conflict, injury recovery, violence against women and children, prehistoric warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review