Cultural Practice and Authenticity
Abstract
This chapter examines what the death of prehistory means for Native Americans in southern New England today. Citing instances where notions of prehistory make difficult attempts to collaborate with indigenous populations, as well as limit avenues for understanding indigenous forms of knowledge, the chapter considers the way archaeologists have studied and interpreted native groups of southern New England and calls for the inclusion of newer cultural practices that reveal the dynamic quality of these contemporary cultures in order to better understand both the past and present. It explores the disconnect that exists for many scholars between the imagined Indian and real native people in southern New England and presents examples of more contemporary cultural practices and places on the landscape that are used and created by native people and serve a purpose in their contemporary cultures. Finally, it analyses structures that symbolise connections to a precolonial presence for the Indian tribes of southern New England.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theoretical Challenges of Indigenous Archaeology: Setting an Agenda
McNiven, I. J. (2016) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.81.1.27 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Imagining an Archaeology of the Future: Capitalism and Colonialism Past and Present
Mrozowski, S. A. (2014) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-014-0261-6 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Violence and Dispossession at the Intersection of Colonialism and Capitalist Accumulation
Mrozowski, S. A. (2019) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-019-00205-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gould, D. R.
- Corresponding author
- Gould, D. Rae
- Venue
- The Death of Prehistory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-11-28
- Pages
- 241-266
- OpenAlex
- W2498286393
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Keywords
- Native Americans, southern New England, authenticity, indigenous knowledge, landscape use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review