Cited by 672Evaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Policy and Administration ResearchSocial Science and Policy Research

Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better

Cartwright, Nancy, Hardie, Jeremy·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overrepresentation of American studies raises concerns about the generalisability of the findings to other regions and educational contexts.

    “While the United States has produced a substantial body of research on interventions aimed at reducing school suspensions, the overrepresentation of American studies raises concerns about the generalisability of the findings to other regions and educational contexts (e.g., Cartwright and Hardie 2012).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-09-27
OpenAlex
W4252738080
Cited by
672
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
evidence-based policy, policy making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review