Cited by 169Evaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Bridging the gap between research and practice: Predicting what will work locally

Open access
Joyce, Kathryn E., Cartwright, Nancy·2020·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

This article addresses the gap between what works in research and what works in practice. Currently, research in evidence-based education policy and practice focuses on randomized controlled trials. These can support causal ascriptions (“It worked”) but provide little basis for local effectiveness predictions (“It will work here”), which are what matter for practice. We argue that moving from ascription to prediction by way of causal generalization (“It works”) is unrealistic and urge focusing research efforts directly on how to build local effectiveness predictions. We outline various kinds of information that can improve predictions and encourage using methods better equipped for acquiring that information. We compare our proposal with others advocating a better mix of methods, like implementation science, improvement science, and practice-based evidence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831219866687

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cartwright, Nancy
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2019-08
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
1045-1082
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2966359812
Cited by
169
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Center for Ethics & Education
  • H2020 European Research Council (667526 K4U)
  • National Science Foundation (1632471)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
research-practice gap, evidence-based education policy, effectiveness prediction, causal generalization, randomized controlled trials, implementation science, improvement science, practice-based evidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review