Cited by 530Historical and modern epidemiology studiesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyLexicography and Language Studies

A Dictionary of Epidemiology (DRAFT)

Miquel S. Porta·2014·Oxford University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acref/9780199976720.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By design, noncomparative studies are severely limited in their power to make causal inferences due to common selection biases and confounding.

    “By design, noncomparative studies are severely limited in their power to make causal inferences due to common selection biases and confounding [43, 44].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porta, M. S.
Corresponding author
Miquel S. Porta
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2014-01-01
OpenAlex
W4239139589
Cited by
530
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.48
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
Keywords
epidemiology, epidemiological terminology, epidemiological concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review