The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 441 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective
Abstract
Abstract Infertility remains a neglected area in sexual and reproductive health, yet its consequences are staggering. Infertility is estimated to impact about 10–25% (estimates range from 48 to 180 million) of couples of reproductive age worldwide. It is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes, financial distress, severe social stigma, increased risk of domestic abuse, and marital instability. Although men and women are equally likely to be infertile, women often bear the societal burden of infertility, particularly in societies where a woman’s identity and social value are closely tied to her ability to bear children. Despite these consequences, disparities in access to infertility treatment between low- and high-income populations persist given the high cost and limited geographic availability of diagnostic services and assisted reproductive technologies. In addition, a considerable proportion of infertility is a result of preventable factors, such as smoking, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy-related infection or unsafe abortion, and environmental contaminants. Accordingly, programs that address the equitable prevention and treatment of infertility are not only in keeping with a reproductive rights perspective but can also improve public health. However, progress on infertility as a global concern in the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights is stymied by challenges in understanding the global epidemiology of infertility, including its causes and determinants, barriers to accessing quality fertility care, and a lack of political will and attention to this issue. The tracking and measurement of infertility are highly complex, resulting in considerable ambiguity about its prevalence and stratification in reproduction globally. A renewed global focus on infertility epidemiology, risk factors, and access to and receipt of quality of care will support individuals in trying to reach their desired number and spacing of children and improve overall health and well-being.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They are denied many privileges in the family and are seen as worthless and useless [27,28].”
Citations
Cites
Lo, W., & Campo‐Engelstein, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89429-4_6 · Cited by 63
Gürtin, Z. B., Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_165 · Cited by 26
Greil, A. L., & Johnson, K. M. (2014) · The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs046 · Cited by 6
Dennison, R. P. (2016) · Encyclopedia of Family Studies · doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs267 · Cited by 3
Infertility and human rights: A jurisprudential survey.
(2020) · Columbia Journal of Gender and Law
UnresolvedUntitled work
(2019) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 126
UnresolvedNot yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America
(1991)
UnresolvedCauses and risk factors for male-factor infertility in Nigeria: A review.
(2013) · African Journal of Reproductive Health
UnresolvedUntitled work
(2020) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
UnresolvedUntitled work
(2017) · Midwifery
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tricotteaux-Zarqaoui, S., Lahimer, M., Diwan, M. A., Corona, A., Candela, P., Cabry, R., Bach, V., Khorsi‐Cauet, H., & Khalifa, M. B. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466967 · Cited by 54
A comprehensive review and update on human fertility cryopreservation methods and tools
Antonouli, S., Nisio, V. D., Messini, C. I., Daponte, A. I., Rajender, S., & Anifandis, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1151254 · Cited by 38
Han, Z., Liu, J., Liu, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136212 · Cited by 29
The psychosocial impact of male infertility on men undergoing ICSI treatment: a qualitative study
de Vries, C. E. J., Veerman-Verweij, E. M., van den Hoogen, A., Ginkel, J. M. D. M., & Ockhuijsen, H. D. L. (2024) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01749-6 · Cited by 29
“However, there is a social belief that infertility is a feminine issue [17], as a result of which women are conceptualized as the centre of infertility [16].”
BackgroundVarlas, V. N., Rhazi, Y., Cloțea, E., Roxana Georgiana, B. O. R. S., Mirică, R., & Bacalbaşa, N. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10163749 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Thoma, M., Fledderjohann, J., Cox, C., & Kantum Adageba, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- St. Catherine University (US)
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Komfo Anoyke Teaching Hospital
- Venue
- Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2021-03-25
- OpenAlex
- W2971514747
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 441
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- infertility, reproductive rights, assisted reproduction, sexual and reproductive health, domestic violence, marital instability, financial distress, infertility risk factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.184
- The paper
- Thoma, M., Fledderjohann, J., Cox, C., & Kantum Adageba, R. (2021). Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.184