Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

“The Paracas society of prehispanic Peru,”

Tantaleán, Henry·2021·Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History

Abstract

Paracas society spread over a large geographical area on the southern Peruvian coast between 800 bce and 200 bce. Unlike an “archaeological culture” that has uniform economy, politics, and ideology and is integrated under a single political structure, the Paracas phenomenon was a series of communities adopting different forms of economic and political organizations that were, nevertheless, economically linked and sharing the same religious ideology. The social mechanisms by which all these communities and political entities were linked included exchange, ritual, and religion, which allowed them to share a series of artifacts, social practices, rituals, and religious iconography. In each of the valleys, every entities, or group of communities, had their own architectural and artisanal features and were economically and politically autonomous. The famous archaeological sites associated with Cerro Colorado on the Paracas peninsula seem to have been more than a central place for Paracas society, a social space of integration in which the worship of ancestors stood out as an ideological and religious sustenance that connected communities and elites from different areas of the southern coast of Peru.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Paracas: Nuevas evidencias, Nuevas perspectivas., Boletín de Arqueología PUCP
  2. 1992, Chavín and the Origins of Andean Civilization
  3. 2017, Interacciones Horizontales y Verticales en la Costa y Sierra Sur en Tiempos Prehispánicos., Boletín de Arqueología PUCP
  4. 1966, Paracas: Cien Siglos de Cultura Peruana
  5. 1991, Un Desierto en Tiempos Prehispánicos: Rio Pisco, Paracas, Rio Ica
  6. 1995, Aproximación a una Secuencia de Fases con Cerámica Temprana de Paracas., Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society
  7. 1953, Paracas Cavernas and Chavín, American Archaeology and Ethnology
  8. Lanning, Edward. “Chronological and Cultural Relationships of Early Pottery Styles in Ancient Peru.” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1960.
  9. 1964, The Paracas Pottery of Ica: A Study in Style and Time
  10. 1991, Paracas, Art & Architecture: Object and Context in South Coastal Peru
  11. Proulx, Donald. “Paracas and Nasca: Regional Cultures on the South Coast of Peru.” In Handbook of South American Archaeology. Edited by Helaine Silverman and William H. Isbell, 563–585. New York: Springer, 2008. · DOI
  12. 2009, New Technologies for Archaeology Multidisciplinary Investigations in Palpa and Nasca, Peru
  13. 1966, Ancient Peruvian Ceramics: The Nathan Cummings Collection
  14. 2009, Paracas Cavernas: Cuaderno de Investigación del Archivo Tello 7
  15. 1979, Paracas Segunda Parte: Cavernas y Necrópolis
  16. 2005, Paracas Primera Parte

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Tantaleán, H.
Affiliations
Escuela Profesional de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Venue
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History
Published
2021-09-29
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review