The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction
Abstract
Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction describes how and why people differ in their thinking power by dealing with issues such as what intelligence is, whether there are several different types of intelligence, and whether one person can be described as more ‘intelligent’ than another. The fact that the broad powers of human intelligence show differences has been recognized since antiquity. Our language is full of words that signify the possession or lack of an efficient brain. People value their powers of thinking. Are differences in intelligence caused by genes or the environment? Does intelligence decline or increase as we grow older? What is the biological basis of thinking?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, good evidence exists that diverse measures of cognitive ability are all statistically related to general intelligence.6”
From Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature (2002) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., et al. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613497473 · Cited by 2,449
All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension
Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2018) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17121383 · Cited by 918
Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature
Ferguson, E., James, D., & Madeley, L. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952 · Cited by 811
Intelligence Predicts Health and Longevity, but Why?
Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301001.x · Cited by 623
Self-citationThe evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence
Reader, S. M., Hager, Y., & Laland, K. N. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0342 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Deary, I. J.
- Corresponding author
- Deary, Ian J.
- ORCID
- Deary, Ian J.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2001-06-07
- OpenAlex
- W4253466860
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- intelligence, individual differences in intelligence, types of intelligence, intelligence testing, heritability of intelligence, gene-environment interaction, cognitive ability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review