The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Commonly Used Intercarcass Distances Appear to Be Sufficient to Ensure Independence of Carrion Insect Succession Pattern
Abstract
Forensic entomology field researchers have typically placed experimental carcasses ≤50 m apart. Direct observations indicate that this intercarcass distance sufficiently prevents cross contamination by crawling larvae, but seems insufficient to prevent highly mobile adult insects from detecting or visiting more than one carcass. It would be valuable if minimum intercarcass distance ensured independence of replicates, because this is an assumption of common statistical analyses. For 32 domestic pig carcasses exposed during two consecutive summers (range of intercarcass distance 30 to >300 m), possible relationships between: 1) average distance to another carcass and aspects of the succession patterns of forensically important species and 2) intercarcass distance and community similarity indices were estimated with regression analyses. In addition, minimum intercarcass distance was investigated through semivariogram analyses of aspects of the succession interval as well as community similarity indices. Pairwise similarity of time to first occurrence was the only variable that displayed a consistent, in this case negative, relationship to intercarcass distance, although not statistically significant for any single analysis. Semivariogram analysis suggested that under the conditions used for our experiment commonly used intercarcass distances are satisfactory to ensure independence of carcasses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For taphonomy studies, a distance of at least 30-50 m were found to be sufficient to ensure sample independence.
“For taphonomy studies, a distance of at least 30 -50 m were found to be sufficient to ensure sample independence [28,169].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [169]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- Anderson G. S. 2010. Factors that influence insect succession on carrion, pp. 201–250. In Byrd J. H. Castner J. L. (eds.), Forensic entomology: The utility of arthropods in legal investigations, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. · DOI
- Anderson, 1996, Initial studies on insect succession on carrion in southwestern British Columbia, J. Forensic Sci., 41, 617, 10.1520/JFS13964J · DOI
- 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00034-3 · DOI
- Avila, 1998, Arthropod succession patterns onto burnt carrion in two contrasting habitats in the Hawaiian Islands, J. Forensic Sci., 43, 581, 10.1520/JFS16184J · DOI
- Bishopp, 1921, Dispersion of flies by flight, J. Agric. Res., 21, 729
- Braack L.E.O. 1984. An ecological investigation of the insects associated with exposed carcasses in the northern Kruger National Park: A study of populations and communities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
- Bunchu, 2012, Occurrence of blow fly species (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Phitsanulok Province, Northern Thailand, Trop. Biomed., 29, 532
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00405.x · DOI
- 10.1590/S0074-02762000000100023 · DOI
- Carvalho, 2004, Observations on the succession patterns of necrophagous insects on a pig carcass in an urban area of southeastern Brazil, Anil Aggrawal’s Internet J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 5, 33
- 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00037-3 · DOI
- Catts, 1992, Problems in estimating the postmortem interval in death investigations, J. Agric. Entomol., 9, 245
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01010.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3671401 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004420050464 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00618.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.010 · DOI
- Gilmour, 1946, An account of experiments undertaken to determine the natural population density of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina Wied, Bull. Aust. Counc. Sci. Ind., 195, 39
- 10.1093/aesa/83.6.1210 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546480 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00854.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04177.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00347601 · DOI
- Journal A. G. Huijbregts C. J. . 1978. Mining geostatistics, p. 600. Academic Press. London, England.
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01113.x · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms1011 · DOI
- 10.2307/1400631 · DOI
- 10.2307/1939924 · DOI
- 10.1603/ME11093 · DOI
- 10.2307/2515 · DOI
- Mann, 1990, Time since death and decomposition of the human body: Variables and observations in case and experimental field studies, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 103, 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.016 · DOI
- 10.1093/ee/22.2.368 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.12.015 · DOI
- 10.1603/ME12200 · DOI
- 10.1603/ME10229 · DOI
- Morisita, 1959, Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. E Biol, 3, 65
- National Research Council. 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward, p. 352. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910213.x · DOI
- Schoenly, 1992, A statistical analysis of successional patterns in carrion-arthropod assemblages: Implications for forensic entomology and determination of the postmortem interval, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 1489, 10.1520/JFS13341J · DOI
- Schoenly, 1987, Dynamics of hetertrophic succession in carrion arthropod assemblages: Discrete series or a continuum of change?, Oecologia, 17, 192, 10.1007/BF00377507 · DOI
- Schoenly, 1991, An experimental field protocol for investigating the postmortem interval using multidisciplinary indicators, J. Forensic Sci., 36, 1395, 10.1520/JFS13161J · DOI
- Schoenly, 1992, A BASIC algorithm for calculating the postmortem interval from arthropod successional data, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 808, 10.1520/JFS11992J · DOI
- 10.1093/jmedent/44.5.881 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.018 · DOI
- 10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.559 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2009.01277.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01206.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/163688a0 · DOI
- 10.1603/0022-2585-41.4.785 · DOI
- 10.1093/jmedent/42.3.481 · DOI
- Tomlin, 2006, Dispersal of Aleochata bilineata (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) following inundative releases in urban gardens, Entomophaga, 37, 55, 10.1007/BF02372974 · DOI
- 10.1093/jmedent/24.3.332 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.07.002 · DOI
- VanLaerhoven, 1999, Insect succession on buried carrion in two biogeoclimatic zones of British Columbia, J. Forensic Sci., 44, 32, 10.1520/JFS14409J · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00317099 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00344966 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Perez, A. E., Haskell, N. H., & Wells, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Saint Joseph's College (US)
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perez, A. E.
- ORCID
- Wells, J. D.
- Venue
- Annals of the Entomological Society of America
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-11-13
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-80
- ISSN
- 0013-8746 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2901
- OpenAlex
- W2265484685
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the Entomological Society of America (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
- Keywords
- forensic entomology, semivariogram
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review