Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 557

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What is the Concept of Globalization Good for? An African Historian's Perspective

Cooper, Frederick·2001·African Affairs

Abstract

African history reveals the inadequacy of the concept of globalization. In contrasting a present of flows with a past of structures, it misreads the ways in which a 400‐year‐long process defined both Africa and the Atlantic‐centred capitalist economy. In regard to both past and present, it draws attention to the specific mechanisms by which long‐distance connections were forged and the limits of those mechanisms. Like modernization theory in the 1950s and 1960s, globalization talk is influential — and deeply misleading — for assuming coherence and direction instead of probing causes and processes. The article argues for more modest and more discerning ways of analyzing processes that cross borders but are not universal, that constitute long‐distance networks and social fields but not on a planetary scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/afraf/100.399.189

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, F.
Venue
African Affairs
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
100
Issue
399
Pages
189-213
ISSN
  • 0001-9909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2621
OpenAlex
W2045998870
Cited by
557
References
0
FWCI
91.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the Concept of Globalization Good for? An African Historian's Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/afraf/100.399.189
The paper
Cooper, F. (2001). What is the Concept of Globalization Good for? An African Historian's Perspective. African Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/100.399.189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.