Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence for the Validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an Elderly Population

LYONS, RONAN A., PERRY, IIUW M., LITTLEPAGE, BEVERLEY N. C.·1994·Age and Ageing

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the Short-form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) is suitable for use in an elderly population. The SF-36 was administered by interview to a random sample of 827 adults from West Glamorgan. Among the 216 adults aged 65 and over the data were 98.8% complete. Evidence for a high degree of internal consistency was good with Cronbach's alpha statistic exceeding 0.8 for each parameter. The evidence for construct validity was also good with the SF-36 distinguishing between those with and without markers of poorer health. The SF-36 is suitable for use with an elderly population when used in an interview setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/23.3.182

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
LYONS, R. A., PERRY, I. M., & LITTLEPAGE, B. N. C.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
1994
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
182-184
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W1973485052
Cited by
385
References
0
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for the Validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an Elderly Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/23.3.182
The paper
LYONS, R. A., PERRY, I. M., & LITTLEPAGE, B. N. C. (1994). Evidence for the Validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an Elderly Population. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/23.3.182

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.