The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to establish reference values for both comfortable and maximum gait speed and to describe the reliability of the gait speed measures and the correlation of selected variables with them. DESIGN: descriptive and cross-sectional. METHODS: subjects were 230 healthy volunteers. Gait was timed over a 7.62 m expanse of floor. Actual and height normalized speed were determined. Lower extremity muscle strength was measured with a hand-held dynamometer. RESULTS: mean comfortable gait speed ranged from 127.2 cm/s for women in their seventies to 146.2 cm/s for men in their forties. Mean maximum gait speed ranged from 174.9 cm/s for women in their seventies to 253.3 cm/s for men in their twenties. Both gait speed measures were reliable (coefficients > or = 0.903) and correlated significantly with age (r > or = -0.210), height (r > or = 0.220) and the strengths of four measured lower extremity muscle actions (r = 0.190-0.500). The muscle action strengths most strongly correlated with gait speed were nondominant hip abduction (comfortable speed) and knee extension (maximum speed). CONCLUSIONS: these normative values should give clinicians a reference against which patient performance can be compared in a variety of settings. Gait speed can be expected to be reduced in individuals of greater age and of lesser height and lower extremity muscle strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Intensity Strength Training in Nonagenarians: Effects on Skeletal Muscle
Fiatarone, M. A. (1990) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440220053029 · Cited by 1,593 · cited 1×
“The higher correlations between muscle strength and gait speed among patients with weakness [21-23] and evidence that strengthening regimens are sometimes accompanied by increases in gait speed [ 24 , 25], on the other hand, suggest that the importance of muscle strength should not be disregarded.”
Background
Cited by
Gait speed and survival in older adults.
Studenski, S. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1923 · Cited by 4,558
“8 79 (74-83) 65 (57-71) 49 (35-61) 91 (89-93) 82 (78-86) 74 (69-78) 57 (52-62) 31 (24-38) 11 (3-28) 74 (71-77) 52 (46-57) 23 (18-28)”
Steffen, T. M., Hacker, T. A., & Mollinger, L. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 · Cited by 2,070
Abellan Van Kan, G., Rolland, Y., Andrieu, S., Bauer, J., Beauchet, O., Bonnefoy, M., Cesari, M., Donini, L. M., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Inzitari, M., et al. (2009) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-009-0246-z · Cited by 2,003
White Paper: “Walking Speed: the Sixth Vital Sign”
Fritz, S., & Lusardi, M. (2009) · Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1519/00139143-200932020-00002 · Cited by 1,390
Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older
Montero-Odasso, M., Schapira, M., Soriano, E. R., Varela, M., Kaplan, R., Camera, L. A., & Mayorga, L. M. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/60.10.1304 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- BOHANNON, R. W.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-19
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2123430619
- Cited by
- 2,341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
- The paper
- BOHANNON, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.