The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument
Abstract
BACKGROUND: since its original implementation in the USA, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) has been used in many countries in languages other than English. This paper describes the efforts that have been made to test the inter-rater reliability of the core set of items forming the minimum data set items in the USA and in non-English speaking countries (Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Sweden and Switzerland). RESULTS: a large proportion (from 70 to 96%) of the items in the RAI achieved an adequate to excellent level of reliability, with no substantial differences across countries. The RAI met the standard for good reliability (i.e. a kappa value of 0.6 or higher) in crucial areas of functional status, such as memory, activities of daily living self-performance and support, and bowel and bladder continence in most of the countries. Indicators of mood and behavioural problems achieved adequate reliability levels of 0.4 or higher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Cited by
Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes
Burrows, A. (2000) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/29.2.165 · Cited by 722
Landi, F., Tua, E., Onder, G., Carrara, B., Sgadari, A., Rinaldi, C., Gambassi, G., Lattanzio, F., & Bernabei, R. (2000) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200012000-00005 · Cited by 494
Self-citationThe MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people
Hirdes, J. P., Frijters, D. H., & Teare, G. F. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51017.x · Cited by 477
Avidan, A. Y., Fries, B. E., James, M. L., Szafara, K. L., Wright, G. T., & Chervin, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53304.x · Cited by 343
Self-citationLam, J. M. C., & Wodchis, W. P. (2010) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca2647 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Sgadari, A., Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Ljunggren, G., JONsson, P. V., Dupaquier, J.-N., & Schroll, M.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- suppl 2
- Pages
- 27-30
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2153820644
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.27
- The paper
- Sgadari, A., Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Ljunggren, G., JONsson, P. V., Dupaquier, J.-N., & Schroll, M. (1997). Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
