Cited by 477Frailty in Older AdultsPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

The MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people

Hirdes, John P., Frijters, Dinnus H., Teare, Gary F.·2003·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a scale predicting mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with frailty. DESIGN: Observational study based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 2.0 and mortality data. SETTING: Ontario chronic hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All chronic hospital patients (N = 28,495) assessed with the MDS 2.0 after mandatory implementation in July 1996 followed until May 1999. MEASUREMENTS: MDS 2.0 assessments done as part of normal practice mainly by registered nurses or multidisciplinary teams in a chronic hospital. Mortality data are available from the accompanying discharge tracking form. RESULTS: The MDS‐Changes in Health, End‐stage disease and Symptoms and Signs (CHESS) score is a composite measure addressing changes in health, end‐stage disease, and symptoms and signs of medical problems. It is a strong predictor of mortality ( P < . 0001) independent of the effects of age, sex, activities of daily living impairment, cognition, and do‐not‐resuscitate orders. It is also strongly associated with physician activity, complex medical procedures, and pain ( P < . 001 for each dependent variable). CONCLUSIONS: The CHESS score provides a useful new MDS‐based test to predict mortality and to measure instability in health as a clinical outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51017.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frail older people receiving inpatient CGA are more likely to return home, less likely to experience cognitive or functional decline, and have lower in-hospital mortality.

    “Frail older people receiving inpatient CGA are more likely to return home, less likely to experience cognitive or functional decline and have lower in-hospital mortality (111).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [111]

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment, provided it is closely linked to interventions, is associated with superior outcomes.

    “The process, provided it is closely linked to interventions, is associated with superior outcomes (111)”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [111]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirdes, J. P., Frijters, D. H., & Teare, G. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hirdes, John P.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
96-100
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1997637125
Cited by
477
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
mortality prediction, frailty, institutionalized elderly, end-stage disease, symptoms and signs, activities of daily living, do-not-resuscitate orders, pain, nursing assessment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Severity of Illness Index, Geriatric Assessment, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review