Cited by 137Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Dyspnoea and quality of life in older people at home

Ho, S. F.·2001·Age and Ageing

Abstract

Objectives To determine the prevalence of dyspnoea in older people at home, measure its impact on function and quality of life, and identify associated cardio-respiratory diseases. Design Cross-sectional population-based study. Methods We sent a modified Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea questionnaire to identify breathlessness in 1404 randomly selected subjects from general practitioner lists of 5002 subjects aged 70 years and over living at home. We visited a further random sample of 500 of these subjects at home and at a study centre. Setting Community-based study in South Wales. Main outcome measures Prevalence of dyspnoea (MRC grades 3-5) and its effect on psychological and functional status, and quality of life as measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression, Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living and SF-36 questionnaires. Results The prevalence of dyspnoea as defined was 32.3% (95% confidence intervals: 30.3, 34.3). Breathless subjects had poorer functional status than non-breathless subjects. They also had poorer physical and mental health and were more likely to be anxious and depressed. The prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, reversible airways disease and obesity were all higher in those with dyspnoea. Conclusions Dyspnoea is common in older people. Given its profound adverse effect on people's lives, dyspnoea is an important public health issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/30.2.155

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, S. F.
Affiliations
University Hospital Llandough (GB)
Corresponding author
Ho, S. F.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
155-159
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2042967298
Cited by
137
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
dyspnea, older adults, quality of life, functional status, cardiopulmonary disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, obesity, anxiety, depression, prevalence, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthritis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Dyspnea, Female, Geriatric Psychiatry, United Kingdom, Housing, Humans, Male, Obesity, Population Surveillance, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Geriatric Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review