Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explosive power and asymmetry in leg muscle function in frequent fallers and non-fallers aged over 65

Skelton, D. A.·2002·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: although low strength is a risk factor for falls, lower limb explosive power is more predictive of functional difficulties than strength. Power may be more predictive of a future fall than strength per se. OBJECTIVE: to compare leg muscle strength and explosive power and asymmetry of leg strength and power of women aged 65 or over living at home, with and without a history of falls. DESIGN: a case controlled study of self-reported 'fallers' versus 'non-fallers'. SUBJECTS: twenty women, aged 65 or over, with a history of at least three falls in the previous year were age matched with 15 women with no history of falls in the previous year. METHODS: lower limb explosive power, isometric strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings, isokinetic concentric strength (100 degrees/sec) of the quadriceps, hamstrings, ankle plantar- and dorsi-flexors and quadriceps eccentric strength (100 degrees/sec). Habitual physical activity was assessed using the self-completed Habitual Activity Profile Questionnaire. RESULTS: the women with a history of falls were less active but were not significantly weaker in any of the strength measurements, apart from ankle dorsiflexion adjusted for body weight. Both groups had significant asymmetry in all the leg muscles for both strength and power. Although both groups were asymmetrical in their lower limb power, the fallers demonstrated a significantly greater asymmetry. When the least powerful legs were compared, the women with a history of falls were 24% less powerful for their weight than those who did not fall (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: weakness and asymmetry is prevalent in women aged 65 and over, with and without a history of falls. Poor lower limb explosive power combined with asymmetry between limbs may be more predictive of future falls than more traditional measurements of strength in older women who live independently.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/31.2.119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Skelton, D. A.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2152556416
Cited by
504
References
2
FWCI
20.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.