Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 706

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers

Melzer, I.·2004·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the identification of specific risk factors for falls in community-dwelling elderly persons is required to identify older people at risk of falling. OBJECTIVE: the aim of the study was to determine the ability of various biomechanical measures of postural stability to identify fallers in the elderly population. METHOD: 19 subjects (78.4 +/- 1.3 years old) who reported having fallen unexpectedly at least twice in the last 6 months, and 124 non-fallers (77.8 +/- 0.53 years old) participated in the study. Balance measurements were made in the upright position in six different conditions using a force platform, and the Limits of Stability Test was carried out. Static two-point discrimination (TPD) testing to the underside of the first toe was made to evaluate the innervation density of the slowly adapting receptors. Finally, maximal isometric lower limb strength was measured in major muscle groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance tests were performed to assess the mean differences between the two groups (fallers and non-fallers). The level of significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: results suggest that control of balance in narrow base stance may be an important tool in identifying elderly fallers. The findings show an increase in mediolateral sway in narrow base stance in older people who experienced recurrent falls. Also, TPD appears to be impaired in elderly fallers (14.93 +/- 1.1 mm versus 12.98 +/- 0.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: simple and safe laboratory quantitative tests were able to differentiate between elderly fallers and elderly individuals who did not fall, suggesting a possible clinical application as a preliminary screening tool for predicting future risk of falling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afh218

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 706

Metadata

Authors
Melzer, I.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2004-09-22
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
602-607
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2140197384
Cited by
706
References
28
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afh218
The paper
Melzer, I. (2004). Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.