Cited by 714Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital in-patients: a systematic review

Oliver, D.·2004·Age and Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify all published papers on risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital inpatients. To identify clinical risk assessment tools or individual clinical risk factors predictive of falls, with the ultimate aim of informing the design of effective fall prevention strategies. DESIGN: Systematic literature review (Cochrane methodology). Independent assessment of quality against agreed criteria. Calculation of odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk factors and of sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value for risk assessment tools (with odds ratios and confidence intervals), where published data sufficient. RESULTS: 28 papers on risk factors were identified, with 15 excluded from further analysis. Despite the identification of 47 papers purporting to describe falls risk assessment tools, only six papers were identified where risk assessment tools had been subjected to prospective validation, and only two where validation had been performed in two or more patient cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of significant falls risk factors emerged consistently, despite the heterogeneity of settings namely gait instability, agitated confusion, urinary incontinence/frequency, falls history and prescription of 'culprit' drugs (especially sedative/hypnotics). Simple risk assessment tools constructed of similar variables have been shown to predict falls with sensitivity and specificity in excess of 70%, although validation in a variety of settings and in routine clinical use is lacking. Effective falls interventions in this population may require the use of better-validated risk assessment tools, or alternatively, attention to common reversible falls risk factors in all patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afh017

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Getting out of the bed unsupervised may lead to falls, which are a major problem in hospitals and contribute to substantial healthcare burden.

    “Getting out of the bed unsupervised may lead to falls being a major problem in hospitals and contribute to substantial healthcare burden, e. g., a significant injury or an increased length of stay (( Oliver et al. 2004), (Oliver et al. 2010)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliver, D.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Oliver, D.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
122-130
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2124142667
Cited by
714
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 43
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
fall risk factors, fall prevention, gait instability, urinary incontinence, fall history, sedative-hypnotic drugs, tool validation, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Hospitals, Humans, Inpatients, Risk Factors, Risk Management, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review