The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of prevalence and incidence studies of dementia with Lewy bodies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substantial variation in the prevalence of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) has been reported with estimates ranging from 0 to 26.3% of all dementia cases, potentially making it the second most common dementia subtype. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review systematically and critically for the first time previous studies of the clinical prevalence and incidence of DLB in the population. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. Selected articles had to describe an original study that provided a prevalence and/or incidence number for the whole population for DLB as defined by pre-set clinical criteria and findings. RESULTS: Six studies reporting the prevalence of DLB and one study reporting the incidence of DLB met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence estimates, depending on case criteria, range from 0 to 5% with regard to the general population, and from 0 to 30.5% of all dementia cases. The only estimate for DLB incidence is 0.1% a year for the general population and 3.2% a year for all new dementia cases. The number of available studies was too small to hypothesise on the potential effect of age, sex and genetic background on the results. CONCLUSIONS: Although the literature on the prevalence and incidence of DLB is limited, there is a general consensus that DLB must be considered in the range of neurodegenerative conditions in the elderly. The move towards use of consensus criteria facilitates comparison and is welcome. Their application in a more routine way towards rigorously defined and selected study populations will lead to more comparable and generalisable studies in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKeith, I. G., Galasko, D., Kosaka, K., Perry, E. K., Dickson, D. W., Hansen, L. A., Salmon, D. P., Lowe, J., Mirra, S. S., Byrne, E. J., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.5.1113 · Cited by 3,960
Prevalence of Dementia in Older Japanese-American Men in Hawaii: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study
White, L. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540120033030 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Neuropathology of sporadic Parkinson's disease: Evaluation and changes of concepts
Jellinger, K. A. (2012) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23795 · Cited by 451
Rolinski, M., Fox, C., Maidment, I., & McShane, R. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006504.pub2 · Cited by 418
Cognitive impairment, decline and fluctuations in older community-dwelling subjects with Lewy bodies
Schneider, J. A., Arvanitakis, Z., Yu, L., Boyle, P. A., Leurgans, S. E., & Bennett, D. A. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws234 · Cited by 273
Guerreiro, R., Ross, O. A., Kun-Rodrigues, C., Hernandez, D. G., Orme, T., Eicher, J. D., Shepherd, C. E., Parkkinen, L., Darwent, L., Heckman, M. G., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30400-3 · Cited by 270
α-synuclein Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction through Spectrin and the Actin Cytoskeleton
Ordonez, D. G., Lee, M. K., & Feany, M. B. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.036 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaccai, J., McCracken, C., & Brayne, C.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 561-566
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2124712545
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.