The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is believed that the prevalence of back pain decreases around the middle of the sixth decade. However, back pain is still among the most commonly reported symptoms in the elderly and osteoarthritis, disc degeneration, osteoporosis and spinal stenosis all increase with age. In light of this, it is difficult to understand why the prevalence of back pain would decrease with increasing age. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at summarising the scientific evidence on the trends of back pain prevalence with age. METHODS: Population-based studies reporting the prevalence of back pain, including people aged 65 years and over, were systematically retrieved from several bibliographic databases. These were read and assessed by two reviewers, and papers retained ('good quality studies') were aggregated according to specific criteria. RESULTS: Good quality studies showed a large heterogeneity as to their methods and prevalence figures. No specific patterns were detected by country nor outcome measure. However, most studies that considered severe forms of back pain found an increase of prevalence with increasing age. The curvilinear association between age and back pain prevalence that is widely mentioned in the literature was found only for benign and mixed problems. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence concerning the association of back pain prevalence with age is more sparse than currently believed and this association seems to be modified by the severity of the problem. This knowledge could have important public health implications, as the proportion of older people will increase considerably in the coming years in most industrialised societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grading the severity of chronic pain
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · Cited by 3,022
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644
The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community
Elliott, A. M., Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Cairns Smith, W., & Alastair Chambers, W. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03057-3 · Cited by 1,208
Côté, P., Cassidy, J. D., & Carroll, L. (1998) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199808010-00015 · Cited by 1,149
The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998
Walker, B. F. (2000) · Journal of Spinal Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003 · Cited by 1,144
An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints
Von Korff, M., Dworkin, S. F., Le Resche, L., & Kruger, A. (1988) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90066-8 · Cited by 968
Prevalence, Determinants, and Consequences of Chronic Neck Pain in Finland
Mäkela, M., Heliövaara, M., Sievers, K., Impivaara, O., Knekt, P., & Aromaa, A. (1991) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116038 · Cited by 546
Thomas, E., Peat, G., Harris, L., Wilkie, R., & Croft, P. R. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.017 · Cited by 508
Self-citationThe prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden
Brattberg, G., Thorslund, M., & Wikman, A. (1989) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90133-4 · Cited by 464
Cassidy, J. D., Carroll, L. J., & Côté, P. (1998) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199809010-00012 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., Baker, P., Smith, E., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 · Cited by 2,555
The epidemiology of low back pain
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,037
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance
van Hecke, O., Torrance, N., & Smith, B. H. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aet123 · Cited by 632
Epidemiology of Low Back Pain in Adults
Manchikanti, L., Singh, V., Falco, F. J. E., Benyamin, R. M., & Hirsch, J. A. (2014) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12018 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Dionne, C. E., Dunn, K. M., & Croft, P. R.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-17
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-234
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2157371077
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afj055
- The paper
- Dionne, C. E., Dunn, K. M., & Croft, P. R. (2006). Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afj055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.