The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of elderly patients as determined by Beers' Criteria
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are associated with inappropriate prescribing (IP) and result in increased morbidity, mortality and resource utilisation. We used Beers' Criteria to determine the three-month prevalence of IP in a non-selected community-dwelling population of acutely ill older people requiring hospitalisation. METHODS: A prospective, observational study of 597 consecutive acute admissions was performed. Diagnoses and concurrent medications were recorded before hospital physician intervention, and Beers' Criteria applied. RESULTS: Mean patient age (SD) was 77 (7) years. Median number of medications was 5, range 0-13. IP occurred in 32% of patients (n = 191), with 24%, 6% and 2% taking 1, 2 and 3 inappropriate medications respectively. Patients taking >5 medications were 3.3 times more likely to receive an inappropriate medication than those taking < or =5 medications (OR 3.34: 95%, CI 2.37-4.79; P<0.001). Forty-nine per cent of patients with inappropriate prescriptions were admitted with adverse effects of the inappropriate medications. Sixteen per cent of all admissions were associated with such adverse effects. CONCLUSION: IP is highly prevalent in acutely ill older patients and is associated with polypharmacy and hospitalisation. However, Beers' Criteria cannot be used as a gold standard as they do not comprehensively address all aspects of IP in older people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fick, D. M., Cooper, J. W., Wade, W. E., Waller, J. L., Maclean, J. R., & Beers, M. H. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716 · Cited by 2,389
Cited by
Jyrkkä, J., Enlund, H., Lavikainen, P., Sulkava, R., & Hartikainen, S. (2011) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.2116 · Cited by 417
Polypharmacy Status as an Indicator of Mortality in an Elderly Population
Jyrkkä, J., Enlund, H., Korhonen, M. J., Sulkava, R., & Hartikainen, S. (2009) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/11319530-000000000-00000 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, P. F., Barry, P. J., Ryan, C., Hartigan, I., & O'Mahony, D.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-101
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2103174324
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of elderly patients as determined by Beers' Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afm116
- The paper
- Gallagher, P. F., Barry, P. J., Ryan, C., Hartigan, I., & O'Mahony, D. (2008). Inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of elderly patients as determined by Beers' Criteria. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.