Cited by 2,389Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacy and Medical Practices

Updating the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults: Results of a US Consensus Panel of Experts

Abstract

Background Medication toxic effects and drug-related problems can have profound medical and safety consequences for older adults and economically affect the health care system. The purpose of this initiative was to revise and update the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in adults 65 years and older in the United States. Methods This study used a modified Delphi method, a set of procedures and methods for formulating a group judgment for a subject matter in which precise information is lacking. The criteria reviewed covered 2 types of statements: (1) medications or medication classes that should generally be avoided in persons 65 years or older because they are either ineffective or they pose unnecessarily high risk for older persons and a safer alternative is available and (2) medications that should not be used in older persons known to have specific medical conditions. Results This study identified 48 individual medications or classes of medications to avoid in older adults and their potential concerns and 20 diseases/conditions and medications to be avoided in older adults with these conditions. Of these potentially inappropriate drugs, 66 were considered by the panel to have adverse outcomes of high severity. Conclusions This study is an important update of previously established criteria that have been widely used and cited. The application of the Beers criteria and other tools for identifying potentially inappropriate medication use will contin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of anticholinergic drugs among people with dementia is recognised as inappropriate by both the Beers and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria.

    “Use of anticholinergic drugs among people with dementia is recognised as inappropriate by both the Beers and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria.10 11”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fick, D. M., Cooper, J. W., Wade, W. E., Waller, J. L., Maclean, J. R., & Beers, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2003-12-08
Volume
163
Issue
22
Pages
2716
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158087005
Cited by
2,389
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 163 · 2012: 254
FWCI
86.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
Beers criteria, potentially inappropriate medications, older adults, drug-related problems, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, medication avoidance, Delphi method, geriatric pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Delphi Technique, Drug Therapy, Humans, Medication Errors, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Drug Prescriptions, United States, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review