Cited by 37Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare cost, quality, practices

STOPP/START version 2—development of software applications: easier said than done?

Anrys, Pauline, Boland, Benoît, Degryse, Jean-Marie, De Lepeleire, Jan, Petrovic, Mirko, Marien, Sophie, Dalleur, Olivia, Strauven, Goedele +2 more·2016·Age and Ageing

Abstract

Explicit criteria, such as the STOPP/START criteria, are increasingly used both in clinical practice and in research to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. In an article on the STOPP/START criteria version 2, O'Mahony et al have pointed out the advantages of developing computerised criteria. Both clinical decision support systems to support healthcare professionals and software applications to automatically detect inappropriate prescribing in research studies can be developed. In the process of developing such tools, difficulties may occur. In the context of a research study, we have developed an algorithm to automatically apply STOPP/START criteria version 2 to our research database. We comment in this paper on different kinds of difficulties encountered and make suggestions that could be taken into account when developing the next version of the criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afw114

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to digitize deprescribing criteria into electronic clinical decision support have raised difficulties, typically requiring a labor-intensive coding process and unstructured information such as free text from patient records to contextualize certain criteria.

    “Attempts to digitize these criteria into electronic clinical decision support (CDS) have raised difficulties, typically requiring a labor-intensive coding process and unstructured information such as free text from patient records to contextualize certain criteria [11,12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anrys, P., Boland, B., Degryse, J.-M., De Lepeleire, J., Petrovic, M., Marien, S., Dalleur, O., Strauven, G., Foulon, V., & Spinewine, A.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Anrys, Pauline
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2016-07-04
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
590-593
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2462137307
Cited by
37
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
STOPP/START criteria, potentially inappropriate prescribing, older adults, clinical decision support systems, algorithm development, software development challenges
MeSH terms
Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Aged, Algorithms, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Drug Prescriptions, Software, Software Design, Databases, Factual, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Inappropriate Prescribing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review