Cited by 82Coffee research and impactsIron Metabolism and DisordersTrace Elements in Health

Coffee consumption as a factor in iron deficiency anemia among pregnant women and their infants in Costa Rica

Muñoz, LM, Lönnerdal, B, Keen, CL, Dewey, KG·1988·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The influence of coffee consumption on hematological and trace element status was studied in two groups of pregnant, low-income Costa Rican women: coffee drinkers (greater than or equal to 450 mL/d, n = 22) and coffee nondrinkers (0 mL/d, n = 26). Groups had similar income, education, prenatal care, age, parity, weight, height, pregnancy weight gain, prenatal iron supplementation, energy, protein, Fe, and vitamin C intake and infant sex and gestational age. Maternal hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) at 8 mo gestation, cord blood Hb and Hct, infant birth weight and Hb and Hct at 1 mo of age, and breast-milk Fe concentration were significantly lower in the coffee group than in the noncoffee group. The association of coffee with infant Hb and Hct was independent of maternal Fe status and birth weight. These results are consistent with our previously reported data in rats and indicate that maternal coffee intake may contribute to maternal and infant anemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/48.3.645

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tea-drinking by infants in Israel and coffee-drinking by pregnant women in Costa Rica have been shown to have a negative effect on Fe status.

    “Tea-drinking by infants in Israel (Merhav et al. 1985) and coffee-drinking by pregnant women in Costa Rica (Munoz et al. 1988) have been shown to have a negative effect on Fe status.”
  • An intake of more than 450 mL (about two cups) of coffee per day may decrease breast milk iron concentrations, which could contribute to infant anemia.

    “an intake of more than 450 mL (about two cups) of coffee per day may decrease breast milk iron concentrations, which could contribute to infant anemia (150).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [150]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muñoz, L., Lönnerdal, B., Keen, C., & Dewey, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-09
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
645-651
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1949413909
Cited by
82
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1p30am035747-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
Keywords
coffee consumption, iron deficiency anemia, pregnancy, infants, maternal hemoglobin, umbilical cord blood, infant hemoglobin, trace elements, low-income women, Costa Rica
MeSH terms
Adult, Anemia, Hypochromic, Animals, Birth Weight, Body Weight, Coffee, Erythrocyte Count, Female, Gestational Age, Hematocrit, Hemoglobins, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Iron, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Milk, Human, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review