Cited by 9Diabetes Management and ResearchFood composition and propertiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Water volume and consumption time: influence on the glycemic and insulinemic responses in non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects

Gregersen, S, Rasmussen, O, Winther, E, Hermansen, K·1990·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The present study was carried out to see if either the volume of water or the duration of ingestion time influence the postprandial blood glucose and insulin responses in non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) subjects. Small test meals containing 40 g carbohydrate as rye bread (100 g) with butter (10 g) and tomatoes (75 g) were given to 10 NIDDM subjects. The meals were taken in random order with either 90 or 600 mL tap water. The meal with 90 mL tap water was ingested over 10 and 30 min. The glycemic responses to isocaloric meals of large and small volumes were similar (338 +/- 56 vs 384 +/- 67 mmol/L.240 min) as were the insulinemic responses (29,424 +/- 6512 min vs 27,140 +/- 6548 mumol/L.240 min). An extension of eating time from 10 to 30 min did not alter the glycemic (384 +/- 67 vs 370 +/- 54 mmol/L.240 min) or the insulinemic response (27,140 +/- 6548 vs 35,670 +/- 10,245 mumol/L.240 min) in the NIDDM patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/52.3.515

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that have examined how volume affects glycaemic response have produced contradictory results.

    “Unfortunately, the results of studies undertaken to date to evaluate the effect of volume on glycaemic response are contradictory.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gregersen et al. 1990

  • Some studies have found no significant effect of water volume on glycaemic response.

    “Some authors found no significant effect of water volume (Gregersen et al. 1990)”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gregersen et al. 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregersen, S., Rasmussen, O., Winther, E., & Hermansen, K.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
515-518
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137858042
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, water intake, drinking time, postprandial blood glucose, insulin response, glycemic response, meal size, carbohydrate intake, rye bread
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Drinking, Eating, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review