An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000-kJ portions of common foods
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to systematically compare postprandial insulin responses to isoenergetic 1000-kJ (240-kcal) portions of several common foods. Correlations with nutrient content were determined. Thirty-eight foods separated into six food categories (fruit, bakery products, snacks, carbohydrate-rich foods, protein-rich foods, and breakfast cereals) were fed to groups of 11-13 healthy subjects. Finger-prick blood samples were obtained every 15 min over 120 min. An insulin score was calculated from the area under the insulin response curve for each food with use of white bread as the reference food (score = 100%). Significant differences in insulin score were found both within and among the food categories and also among foods containing a similar amount of carbohydrate. Overall, glucose and insulin scores were highly correlated (r = 0.70, P < 0.001, n = 38). However, protein-rich foods and bakery products (rich in fat and refined carbohydrate) elicited insulin responses that were disproportionately higher than their glycemic responses. Total carbohydrate (r = 0.39, P < 0.05, n = 36) and sugar (r = 0.36, P < 0.05, n = 36) contents were positively related to the mean insulin scores, whereas fat (r = -0.27, NS, n = 36) and protein (r = -0.24, NS, n = 38) contents were negatively related. Consideration of insulin scores may be relevant to the dietary management and pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia and may help increase the accuracy of estimating preprandial insulin requirements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For many CHO-rich foods and pure CHO, there appears to be a close correlation between glycaemic and insulinaemic responses.
“However, for many CHO-rich foods and pure CHO, there appears to be a close correlation between glycaemic and insulinaemic responses (Holt et al. 1997;Englyst et al. 2003).”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Holt et al. 1997
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 353
- Authors
- Holt, S., Miller, J., & Petocz, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- ORCID
- Petocz, P
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1264-1276
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104604816
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- insulin index, postprandial insulin response, glycemic index, food comparison, carbohydrate content, sugar content, dietary fat, protein-rich foods, bakery products, breakfast cereals, fruits, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Eating, Female, Food, Humans, Insulin, Male, Nutritive Value, Reference Standards, Postprandial Period, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review