Cited by 353Food composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000-kJ portions of common foods

Open access
Holt, SH, Miller, JC, Petocz, P·1997·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically compare postprandial insulin responses to isoenergetic 1000-kJ (240-kcal) portions of several common foods. Correlations with nutrient content were determined. Thirty-eight foods separated into six food categories (fruit, bakery products, snacks, carbohydrate-rich foods, protein-rich foods, and breakfast cereals) were fed to groups of 11-13 healthy subjects. Finger-prick blood samples were obtained every 15 min over 120 min. An insulin score was calculated from the area under the insulin response curve for each food with use of white bread as the reference food (score = 100%). Significant differences in insulin score were found both within and among the food categories and also among foods containing a similar amount of carbohydrate. Overall, glucose and insulin scores were highly correlated (r = 0.70, P < 0.001, n = 38). However, protein-rich foods and bakery products (rich in fat and refined carbohydrate) elicited insulin responses that were disproportionately higher than their glycemic responses. Total carbohydrate (r = 0.39, P < 0.05, n = 36) and sugar (r = 0.36, P < 0.05, n = 36) contents were positively related to the mean insulin scores, whereas fat (r = -0.27, NS, n = 36) and protein (r = -0.24, NS, n = 38) contents were negatively related. Consideration of insulin scores may be relevant to the dietary management and pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia and may help increase the accuracy of estimating preprandial insulin requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/66.5.1264

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For many CHO-rich foods and pure CHO, there appears to be a close correlation between glycaemic and insulinaemic responses.

    “However, for many CHO-rich foods and pure CHO, there appears to be a close correlation between glycaemic and insulinaemic responses (Holt et al. 1997;Englyst et al. 2003).”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Holt et al. 1997

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 353

Authors
Holt, S., Miller, J., & Petocz, P.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
1264-1276
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104604816
Cited by
353
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
insulin index, postprandial insulin response, glycemic index, food comparison, carbohydrate content, sugar content, dietary fat, protein-rich foods, bakery products, breakfast cereals, fruits, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Eating, Female, Food, Humans, Insulin, Male, Nutritive Value, Reference Standards, Postprandial Period, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review