Clinical outcome of geriatric patients in the United States receiving home parenteral and enteral nutrition
Open accessAbstract
In this study the use of home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) therapy in geriatric patients and the effect of aging on the clinical outcome of HPEN therapy was assessed between 1985 and 1992. Data were obtained from Medicare (part B) parenteral and enteral nutrition workload statistics, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, and the North American HPEN Patient Registry. On the basis of these data it was estimated that in 1992 there were 40,000 HPN patients and 152,000 HEN patients nationwide. One-quarter to one-third of the HPN group was aged > or = 65 y, depending on the underlying diagnosis. Geriatric HPN patients had a generally good outcome but did not do as well as their younger counterparts; however, they had fewer therapy-related complications than children. In the HEN group, 44% of cancer patients and 69% of patients with neuromuscular swallowing disorders were geriatric. Geriatric HEN patients with swallowing disorders had a poorer outcome (i.e., lower survival, poorer rehabilitation, and fewer resumed full oral nutrition) than younger patients after 1 y of follow-up. In conclusion, although aging was associated with a poorer outcome for HPN patients, it was still reasonably good; therefore, age per se should not exclude geriatric subjects from therapy. For HEN, the poorer outcome in geriatric dysphagic patients raises concern regarding the appropriateness of this therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have documented that parenteral nutrition is a feasible and successful method of nutritional support also in older people, not only in the hospital but also at home.
“Several studies have documented that PN is a feasible and successful method of nutritional support also in older people (130,(178)(179)(180), not only in the hospital but also at home (181).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [179]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Howard, L., & Malone, M.
- Affiliations
- Albany Medical College (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1364-1370
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1783133893
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- home parenteral nutrition, home enteral nutrition, elderly patients, aging, clinical outcomes, dysphagia, cancer patients, neuromuscular disorders, survival, rehabilitation, Medicare
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, United States, Geriatric Assessment, Prevalence, Survival Rate, Parenteral Nutrition, Home, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review