CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 560Probiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective role of probiotics and prebiotics in colon cancer

Open access
Wollowski, Ingrid, Rechkemmer, Gerhard, Pool-Zobel, Beatrice L·2001·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.451s
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ingestion of viable probiotics or prebiotics is associated with anticarcinogenic effects, one mechanism of which is the detoxification of genotoxins in the gut. This mechanism was shown experimentally in animals with use of the rat colon carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and by determining endpoints that range from tumorigenesis to induction of DNA damage. Because of the complexity of cancer initiation, cancer progression, and the exposure of cancer in the gut, many types of interactions may be envisaged. Notably, some of our newer studies showed that short-lived metabolite mixtures isolated from milk that was fermented with strains of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus are more effective in deactivating etiologic risk factors of colon carcinogenesis than are cellular components of microorganisms. Ingestion of prebiotics results in a different spectrum of fermentation products, including the production of high concentrations of short-chain fatty acids. Gut flora, especially after the ingestion of resistant starch, induces the chemopreventive enzyme glutathione transferase pi in the colon of the rat. Together, these factors lead to a reduced load of genotoxic agents in the gut and to an increased production of agents that deactivate toxic components. Butyrate is one such protective agent and is associated with lowering cancer risk. It was recently shown that buytrate may inhibit the genotoxic activity of nitrosamides and hydrogen peroxide in human colon cells. In humans, the ingestion of probiotics leads to the excretion of urine with low concentrations of components that are genotoxic in human colon cells and high concentrations of components that induce oxidized DNA bases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.451s

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kasper, 1996, Lebendkeime in fermentierten Milchprodukten—ihre Bedeutung für die Prophylaxe und Therapie. (Living bacteria in fermented milk products—their importance for prophylaxis and therapy), Ernahrungsumschau, 43, 40
  2. Morotomi, 1986, In vitro binding of potent mutagenic pyrolysates, J Natl Cancer Inst, 77, 195
  3. Tanabe, 1994, Effect of pepsin, trypsin or bile acid on the binding of tryptophane pyrolysates by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis T-80, Milchwissenschaft, 49, 438

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–560 of 560

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wollowski, I., Rechkemmer, G., & Pool-Zobel, B. L.
Affiliations
Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
451s-455s
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1093/ajcn/73.2.451s
OpenAlex
W1940221461
Cited by
560
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 29
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, prebiotics, colon cancer, chemoprevention, genotoxicity, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, glutathione S-transferase pi, resistant starch, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, DNA damage, nitrosamides, hydrogen peroxide, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Animals, Butyrates, Colon, Colonic Neoplasms, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Damage, Fermentation, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Lactobacillus, Mutation, Streptococcus, Chemoprevention, Probiotics, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review