Aduhelm, the Newly Approved Medication for Alzheimer Disease: What Epidemiologists Can Learn and What Epidemiology Can Offer
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive disorder common among older adults and culminating in profound cognitive impairments and high mortality risk. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently provided accelerated approval for Aduhelm, a medication for AD treatment. Aduhelm (Biogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts) has been described as the first disease-modifying treatment for AD but has not been demonstrated to improve patients’ cognitive or functional outcomes. In this commentary, we describe why Aduhelm approval was controversial and aspects of the current evidence of special pertinence to epidemiologists. The FDA decision was based primarily on 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both terminated early, with conflicting findings about the cognitive benefits of Aduhelm. Both RCTs showed important adverse effects of the medication. The FDA cited the documented reduction in brain amyloid, an AD biomarker hypothesized as a surrogate outcome, to justify accelerated approval. Despite lack of racial/ethnic diversity in the RCT participants, concerns about health disparities have been invoked to argue for public funding of this expensive medication. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently made a “Coverage with Evidence Development” determination for Aduhelm and similar medications. We end by describing how innovative study designs could accelerate postapproval research and evaluate the proposed surrogate outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine remain the mainstay of symptomatic treatment but fail to halt or reverse AD progression.
“Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine remain the mainstay of symptomatic treatment, yet they fail to halt or reverse disease progression [3].”
From Toward a Unified Framework in Molecular Neurobiology of Alzheimer’s Disease: Revisiting the Pathophysiological Hypotheses (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The paper’s opening discussion (page unavailable) says that no medications are established to slow Alzheimer disease progression and contrasts disease-modifying drugs with drugs that relieve symptoms. It does not name cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, establish that they are the mainstay of symptomatic treatment, or specifically discuss reversal of progression. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Mintun, M. A., Lo, A. C., Duggan Evans, C., Wessels, A. M., Ardayfio, P. A., Andersen, S. W., Shcherbinin, S., Sparks, J., Sims, J. R., Brys, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2100708 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Inequalities in dementia incidence between six racial and ethnic groups over 14 years
Mayeda, E. R., Glymour, M. M., Quesenberry, C. P., & Whitmer, R. A. (2016) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.007 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- [3]3. Lin, GA, Whittington, MD, Synnot, PG, et al. Aducanumab for Alzheimer's Disease: Effectiveness and Value-ICER Evidence Report . Boston, MA: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review; 2021. https://icer.org/wp-content/ uploads/2020/10/ICER\_ALZ\_Revised\_Evidence\_ Report\_06302021.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2022.
- [6]6. Ackley SF, Zimmerman SC, Brenowitz WD, et al. Effect of reductions in amyloid levels on cognitive change in randomized trials: instrumental variable meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;372:n156.
- [7]7. Salloway S, Chalkias S, Barkhof F, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in 2 phase 3 studies evaluating Aducanumab in patients with early Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2021;79(1):13-21.
- [8]8. Farina MP, Hayward MD, Kim JK, et al. Racial and educational disparities in dementia and dementia-free life expectancy. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020; 75(7):e105-e112.
- [9]9. Weuve J, Barnes LL, Mendes de Leon CF, et al. Cognitive aging in Black and White Americans: cognition, cognitive decline, and incidence of Alzheimer disease dementia. Epidemiology. 2018;29(1):151-159.
- [10]10. Manly JJ, Glymour MM. What the Aducanumab approval reveals about Alzheimer disease research. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(11):1305-1306.
- [12]12. Carnethon MR, Pu J, Howard G, et al. Cardiovascular health in African Americans: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(21): e393-e423.
- [13]13. Glymour MM, Brickman AM, Kivimaki M, et al. Will biomarker-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease maximize scientific progress? Evaluating proposed diagnostic criteria. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(7):607-612.
- [14]14. Garrett MD. A critique of the 2018 National Institute on Aging's research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neurobiol. 2018;9(1):49-58.
- [16]16. Planche V, Villain N. US Food and Drug Administration approval of Aducanumab-is amyloid load a valid surrogate end point for Alzheimer disease clinical trials? JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(11):1307-1308.
- [17]17. Panza F, Lozupone M, Logroscino G, et al. A critical appraisal of amyloidβ -targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(2):73-88.
- [18]18. Cole SR, Frangakis CE. The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption? Epidemiology. 2009;20(1):3-5.
- [20]20. Shugart J. On Donanemab, Plaques Plummet. Off Donanemab, They Stay Away. ALZFORUM Netw. Cure. 2021. https://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/ donanemab-plaques-plummet-donanemab-they-stay-away. Accessed March 29, 2022.
- [22]22. Moynihan RN, Cooke GPE, Doust JA, et al. Expanding disease definitions in guidelines and expert panel ties to industry: a cross-sectional study of common conditions in the United States. PLoS Med. 2013;10(8):e1001500.
- [24]24. Trivedi DP, Braun A, Dickinson A, et al. Managing behavioural and psychological symptoms in community dwelling older people with dementia: 1. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. Dementia. 2019;18(7-8): 2925-2949.
- [10]10. recipient behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(8):1121-1127.e1.
- [27]27. Rajan KB, Weuve J, Barnes LL, et al. Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020-2060). Alzheimers Dement . 2021;17(12):1966-1975.
- [29]29. Anderson MD, Ayanian JZ, Souza J, et al. Representativeness of participants eligible to be enrolled in clinical trials of Aducanumab for Alzheimer disease compared with Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1627-1629.
- [31]31. Glymour MM, Mor V. A large pragmatic trial is the right solution for testing anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease [published online ahead of print February 6, 2022]. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022. (https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17695). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hein, Z. M., Karikalan, B., Gopalakrishna, P. K., Dhevi, K., Alkatiri, A., Hussan, F., Mohd Moklas, M. A., Jagadeesan, S., Che Ramli, M. D., Che Mohd Nassir, C. M. N., et al. (2026) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-025-05602-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
A call for clinical trial globalization in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia
Llibre‐Guerra, J. J., Heavener, A., Brucki, S. M. D., Marante, J. P. D., Pintado‐Caipa, M., Chen, Y., Behrens, M. I., Hardi, A., Admirall‐Sanchez, A., Akinyemi, R., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12995 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Glymour, M. M., Weuve, J., Dufouil, C., & Mayeda, E. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Bordeaux Population Health (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Glymour, M Maria
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-04-06
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1347-1351
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- PMC
- PMC9614924
- OpenAlex
- W4225768993
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R00AG053410, R13AG064971, R01AG057869, R56AG069126, R01AG067497, R01AG065359)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, accelerated FDA approval, surrogate endpoints, disease-modifying therapy, adverse drug reactions, racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials, health disparities, coverage with evidence development, cognitive outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Epidemiologists, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review