The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mesothelioma Trends in the United States: An Update Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data for 1973 through 2003
Abstract
Using 1973-2000 mesothelioma incidence data released by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program in April 2003, the authors estimated the parameters of a birth-cohort and age model to determine whether previously reported patterns of mesothelioma in the United States have changed. Compared with analyses based on data through 1992, a slower decline was found in male cases immediately after a peak in 2000-2004, but no other notable changes in the time pattern were detected. Analysis confirmed that the annual number of male mesothelioma cases, which increased steeply from the 1970s through the mid-1990s, has leveled off in terms of both the age-adjusted rate and the absolute numbers of cases. After a peak of approximately 2,000 cases, a return to background levels is expected by 2055. The total projected number of male mesothelioma cases in 2003-2054 is approximately 71,000. The maximum lifetime risk for males, which occurs for the 1925-1929 birth cohort, is 1.8 x 10(-3). The age-adjusted rate for females is constant, as are the female lifetime mesothelioma risk across birth cohorts (3.6 x 10(-4)) and the annual risk (3.9 x 10(-6)). The time pattern of cases for females supports the existence of a threshold exposure for mesothelioma and a quantifiable background rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The expected burden of mesothelioma mortality in Great Britain from 2002 to 2050
Hodgson, J. T., McElvenny, D. M., Darnton, A. J., Price, M. J., & Peto, J. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602307 · Cited by 283
Malignant Mesothelioma: Global Incidence and Relationship with Asbestos
BIANCHI, C., & BIANCHI, T. (2007) · Industrial Health · doi:10.2486/indhealth.45.379 · Cited by 261
The French National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program
Goldberg, M., Imbernon, E., Rolland, P., Soit Ilg, A. G., Savès, M., de Quillacq, A., Frenay, C., Chamming’s, S., Arveux, P., Boutin, C., et al. (2006) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2005.023200 · Cited by 184
Marinaccio, A., Montanaro, F., Mastrantonio, M., Uccelli, R., Altavista, P., Nesti, M., Costantini, A. S., & Gorini, G. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.20820 · Cited by 123
Case, B. W., Abraham, J. L., Meeker, G., Pooley, F. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556045 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-15
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-112
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131934427
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesothelioma Trends in the United States: An Update Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data for 1973 through 2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwh025
- The paper
- Price, B. (2004). Mesothelioma Trends in the United States: An Update Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data for 1973 through 2003. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.