The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-based Estimation of Relative Risks and Other Epidemiologic Measures in Studies of Common Outcomes and in Case-Control Studies
Abstract
Some recent articles have discussed biased methods for estimating risk ratios from adjusted odds ratios when the outcome is common, and the problem of setting confidence limits for risk ratios. These articles have overlooked the extensive literature on valid estimation of risks, risk ratios, and risk differences from logistic and other models, including methods that remain valid when the outcome is common, and methods for risk and rate estimation from case-control studies. The present article describes how most of these methods can be subsumed under a general formulation that also encompasses traditional standardization methods and methods for projecting the impact of partially successful interventions. Approximate variance formulas for the resulting estimates allow interval estimation; these intervals can be closely approximated by rapid simulation procedures that require only standard software functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.
BRUZZI, P., GREEN, S. B., BYAR, D. P., BRINTON, L. A., & SCHAIRER, C. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174 · Cited by 1,214
Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
Greenland, S., & Drescher, K. (1993) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532206 · Cited by 565
Self-citationQuantifying and Reporting Uncertainty from Systematic Errors
Phillips, C. V. (2003) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000072106.65262.ae · Cited by 168
Greenland, S. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/01621450338861905 · Cited by 141
Self-citationGreenland, S. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.8.1166 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019
(U.S.), C. F. D. C. A. P. (2019) · doi:10.15620/cdc:82532 · Cited by 5,782
Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and Differences
Spiegelman, D. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi188 · Cited by 1,738
Ronksley, P. E., Brien, S. E., Turner, B. J., Mukamal, K. J., & Ghali, W. A. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d671 · Cited by 1,610
Active Smoking and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Willi, C., Bodenmann, P., Ghali, W. A., Faris, P. D., & Cornuz, J. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2654 · Cited by 1,268
Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors
Cooper, W. O., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Arbogast, P. G., Dudley, J. A., Dyer, S., Gideon, P. S., Hall, K., & Ray, W. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055202 · Cited by 1,192
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenland, S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08-15
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301-305
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126028971
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-based Estimation of Relative Risks and Other Epidemiologic Measures in Studies of Common Outcomes and in Case-Control Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwh221
- The paper
- Greenland, S. (2004). Model-based Estimation of Relative Risks and Other Epidemiologic Measures in Studies of Common Outcomes and in Case-Control Studies. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.