Are the acute effects of particulate matter on mortality in the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study the result of inadequate control for weather and season? A sensitivity analysis using flexible distributed lag models
Abstract
Time-series studies have linked daily variations in nonaccidental deaths with daily variations in ambient particulate matter air pollution, while controlling for qualitatively larger influences of weather and season. Although time-series analyses typically include nonlinear terms for weather and season, questions remain as to whether models to date have completely controlled for these important predictors. In this paper, the authors use two flexible versions of distributed lag models to control extensively for the confounding effects of weather and season. One version builds on the current approach to controlling for weather, while the other version offers a new approach. The authors conduct a comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the particulate matter-mortality relation by applying these methods to the recently updated National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study database that comprises air pollution, weather, and mortality time series from 1987 to 2000 for 100 US cities. They combine city-specific estimates of the short-term effects of particulate matter on mortality using a Bayesian hierarchical model. They conclude that, within the broad classes of models considered, national average estimates of particulate matter relative risk are consistent with previous estimates from this study and are robust to model specification for weather and seasonal confounding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
National average estimates are robust to model specification for weather and seasonal confounding.
“Sensitivity analyses and characteristics of the first-stage statistical model for confounding adjustment have been explored for particulate matter (PM), with results indicating that national average estimates are robust to model specification for weather and seasonal confounding (Peng et al. 2005; Welty and Zeger 2005).”
From The Exposure–Response Curve for Ozone and Risk of Mortality and the Adequacy of Current Ozone Regulations (2006) · cites this paper as Welty and Zeger 2005
Cites
Inference for Multivariate Normal Hierarchical Models
Everson, P. J., & Morris, C. N. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00239 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distributed lag non‐linear models
Gasparrini, A., Armstrong, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3940 · Cited by 2,481 · see citing works
Model Choice in Time Series Studies of Air Pollution and Mortality
Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., & Louis, T. A. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00410.x · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Kan, H., London, S. J., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Song, G., Zhao, N., Jiang, L., & Chen, B. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10851 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Bell, M. L., Peng, R. D., & Dominici, F. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8816 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
- Authors
- Welty, L. J., & Zeger, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Welty, Leah J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-88
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2135481801
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (HEI025)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES012054)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- particulate matter, air pollution, mortality, seasonal effects, distributed lag models, sensitivity analysis, Bayesian hierarchical model, relative risk, short-term exposure effects
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Air Pollutants, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Seasons, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Weather, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review