The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sex Ratio for Barrett's Esophagus, Erosive Reflux Disease, and Nonerosive Reflux Disease
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus is associated with reflux disease and substantially increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The authors undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the sex ratio for Barrett's esophagus, erosive reflux disease (ERD), and nonerosive reflux disease (non-ERD) to compare these results with the sex ratio for esophageal adenocarcinoma. MEDLINE (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) (1966-2004) and EMBASE (Reed Elsevier PLC, Amsterdam, Netherlands) (1980-2004) were searched for relevant citations with a highly sensitive search strategy. Studies to be included required a sample size of 50 or more patients and consecutive recruitment at an institute accessible by all. Stata, version 8.2, software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas) was used to conduct random effects meta-analyses. Excess heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression. The Barrett's esophagus meta-analysis gave an overall pooled male/female sex ratio of 1.96/1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.77, 2.17/1). For ERD, the pooled male/female sex ratio was 1.57/1 (95% CI: 1.40, 1.76/1) and, for non-ERD, 0.72/1 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.84/1). All of these estimates were associated with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 81.1%, 92.7%, and 88.8%, respectively). The meta-analysis estimates for ERD and Barrett's esophagus, while showing an excess of males, are substantially lower than similar estimates for esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is important to establish why male Barrett's esophagus and ERD patients are at increased risk of malignancy compared with females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drossman, D. A., Li, Z., Andruzzi, E., Temple, R. D., Talley, N. J., Grant Thompson, W., Whitehead, W. E., Janssens, J., Funch-Jensen, P., Corazziari, E., et al. (1993) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01303162 · Cited by 2,198
Cited by
Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, genetic association, and treatment
Huang, F.-L., & Yu, S.-J. (2018) · Asian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.005 · Cited by 874
Endoscopic findings of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in elderly and younger age groups
Adanir, H., Baş, B., Pakoz, B., Günay, S., Camyar, H., & Ustaoglu, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.606205 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, M. B., Wild, C. P., & Forman, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-12
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1050-1061
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2150063540
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sex Ratio for Barrett's Esophagus, Erosive Reflux Disease, and Nonerosive Reflux Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwi325
- The paper
- Cook, M. B., Wild, C. P., & Forman, D. (2005). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sex Ratio for Barrett's Esophagus, Erosive Reflux Disease, and Nonerosive Reflux Disease. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.