Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Albuminuria Assessed From First-Morning-Void Urine Samples Versus 24-Hour Urine Collections as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Lambers Heerspink, H. J., Brantsma, A. H., de Zeeuw, D., Bakker, S. J. L., de Jong, P. E., Gansevoort, R. T., for the PREVEND Study Group·2008·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Screening for albuminuria has been advocated because it is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. The "gold standard" to assess albuminuria is 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (UAE). Because 24-hour urine collection is cumbersome, guidelines suggest measuring albuminuria in a first morning void, either as urinary albumin concentration (UAC) or adjusted for creatinine concentration, the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). To decide which albuminuria measure to use in clinical practice, it is essential to know which best predicts clinical outcome. In a sample representative of the Groningen (the Netherlands) population (n = 3,414), the authors compared UAC, ACR, and UAE as predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, which ended December 31, 2005, they observed 278 events (a major adverse cardiovascular event or mortality). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve predicting events was 0.65 for UAE, 0.62 for UAC (P = 0.06 vs. UAE), and 0.66 for ACR (P = 0.80 vs. UAE; P = 0.01 vs. UAC). When sex-specific subgroups were considered, UAE was superior to UAC in predicting outcome (P = 0.04) for females, whereas, for males as well as females, no difference was found between ACR and UAE. To predict cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality, measuring ACR in a first-morning-void urine sample is a good alternative to measuring 24-hour UAE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwn209

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Lambers Heerspink, H. J., Brantsma, A. H., de Zeeuw, D., Bakker, S. J. L., de Jong, P. E., Gansevoort, R. T., & for the PREVEND Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-08-12
Volume
168
Issue
8
Pages
897-905
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2156822292
Cited by
253
References
3
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Albuminuria Assessed From First-Morning-Void Urine Samples Versus 24-Hour Urine Collections as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwn209
The paper
Lambers Heerspink, H. J., Brantsma, A. H., de Zeeuw, D., Bakker, S. J. L., de Jong, P. E., Gansevoort, R. T., & for the PREVEND Study Group. (2008). Albuminuria Assessed From First-Morning-Void Urine Samples Versus 24-Hour Urine Collections as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn209

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.