The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Health Status of Nonparticipants in a Population-based Health Study: The Hordaland Health Study
Abstract
The authors aimed to examine whether nonparticipation in a population-based health study was associated with poorer health status; to determine whether specific health problems were overrepresented among nonparticipants; and to explore potential consequences of participation bias on associations between exposures and outcomes. They used data from the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK), conducted in western Norway in 1997-1999. Of 29,400 persons invited, 63.1% participated in the study. Information from HUSK was linked with the Norwegian national registry of disability pensions (DPs), including information about DP diagnosis. The risk of DP receipt was almost twice as high among nonparticipants as participants (relative risk = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.81, 1.95). The association was strongest for DPs received for mental disorders, with a 3-fold increased risk for nonparticipation. Substance abuse, psychotic disorders, and personality disorders were especially overrepresented among nonparticipants. The authors simulated the impact of nonparticipation on associations between exposures and outcomes by excluding HUSK participants with higher symptoms of common mental disorders (exposure) and examining the impact on DP (outcome). This selective exclusion modestly reduced associations between common mental disorders and DP. The authors conclude that nonparticipants have poorer health, but this is disorder-dependent. Participation bias is probably a greater threat to the validity of prevalence studies than to studies of associations between exposures and outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“non-participants of health surveys generally have worse health than participants,29”
In the citing paper
“It should be also mentioned that people with mental disorders could be less likely to participate in cross-sectional population surveys and therefore our results may be under-estimates of true population prevalence (Arias-de la Torre et al., 2020; Knudsen et al., 2010).”
From Prevalence and age patterns of depression in the United Kingdom. A population-based study (2021) · cites this paper as Knudsen et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies
Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013 · Cited by 1,877
The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): design and field procedures
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P. A., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Heeringa, S. G., Hiripi, E., Jin, R., Pennell, B., Walters, E. E., Zaslavsky, A. M., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.167 · Cited by 858
The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): background and aims
Kessler, R. C., & Merikangas, K. R. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.166 · Cited by 745
Manjer, J., Carlsson, S., Elmståhl, S., Gullberg, B., Janzon, L., Lindström, M., Mattisson, I., & Berglund, G. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/00008469-200112000-00003 · Cited by 543
The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995-97 (HUNT 2): Objectives, contents, methods and participation
Holmen, J., Midthjell, K., Krüger, Ø., Langhammer, A., Holmen, T. L., Bratberg, G. H., Vatten, L., & Lund‐Larsen, P. G. (2003) · Cited by 526
Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey
Korkeila, K., Suominen, S., Ahvenainen, J., Ojanlatva, A., Rautava, P. T., Helenius, H. Y. M., & Koskenvuo, M. (2001) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1023/a:1020016922473 · Cited by 512
Mika Kivimaki, B., Head, J. A., Ferrie, J. E., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J., & Marmot, M. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.364 · Cited by 453
The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS): objectives and design
Bijl, R. V., van Zessen, G., Ravelli, A., de Rijk, C., & Langendoen, Y. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050097 · Cited by 369
de Graaf, R., Bijl, R. V., Smit, F., Ravelli, A., & Vollebergh, W. (2000) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/152.11.1039 · Cited by 355
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Holmen, 1990, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening, 110, 1973
- 2003, NOR EPIDEMIOL, 13, 19
- Overland, 2007, Psychiatric Services, 58, 1479, 10.1176/appi.ps.58.11.1479 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Matcham, F., Rayner, L., Steer, S., & Hotopf, M. (2013) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket169 · Cited by 928
Self-citationMatcham, F., Scott, I. C., Rayner, L., Hotopf, M. H., Kingsley, G. H., Norton, S., Scott, D. L., & Steer, S. E. (2014) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.001 · Cited by 574
Self-citationMcManus, S., Gunnell, D., Cooper, C., Bebbington, P. E., Howard, L. M., Brugha, T., Jenkins, R., Hassiotis, A., Weich, S., & Appleby, L. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30188-9 · Cited by 415
Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses
Schoeler, T., Speed, D., Porcu, E., Pirastu, N., Pingault, J., & Kutalik, Z. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9 · Cited by 437
Langhammer, A., Krokstad, S., Romundstad, P., Heggland, J., & Holmen, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-143 · Cited by 388
“; licensee BioMed C Creative Commons Attribution License (http:/ distribution, and reproduction in any medium Participation rates in population-based studies have declined during the last three decades [1], and this is the case also in most Norwegian epidemiological studies such as the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUN…”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Knudsen, A. K., Hotopf, M., Skogen, J. C., Overland, S., & Mykletun, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Knudsen, A. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-15
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1306-1314
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2163894459
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 73.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0507-10088)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- non-participation, participation bias, Hordaland Health Study, disability pension, common mental disorders, substance abuse, psychosis, personality disorders, health status, prevalence studies, exposure-outcome association, research validity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Participation, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Female, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Norway, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Selection Bias, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Insurance, Disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
