Cited by 49COVID-19 and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesStudent Stress and Coping

Changes in mental health problems and suicidal behaviour in students and their associations with COVID-19-related restrictions in Norway: a national repeated cross-sectional analysis

Open access
Sivertsen, Børge, Knapstad, Marit, Petrie, Keith, O’Connor, Rory, Lønning, Kari Jussie, Hysing, Mari·2022·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on higher education, with the closure of student campuses. The aim of this study was to examine changes and prevalence of mental health problems, suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour, and their associations with COVID-19-related restrictions. Design, setting and participants: As part of the SHoT-study in Norway, 62 498 students completed an online questionnaire (65.6% women; response rate of 34.4%) in March 2021. Data were compared with previous waves, conducted in 2018, 2014 and 2010. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Mental health problems were assessed using the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist. Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) were assessed with three items drawn from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, and thoughts of NSSH were assessed with one item from the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study. Results: There was a significant increase in mental health problems from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001). A similar pattern was also observed for suicidal thoughts. Unlike previous waves, there were large geographical differences in mental health problems in 2021, which mapped onto the different levels of COVID-19 cases and regional COVID-19-related restrictions. There was a significant negative dose–response association between days spent physically on campus and both mental health problems and indicators of suicide risk. We found the fewer days spent on campus in the last 2 weeks, the higher levels of mental health problems during the same time period. There was also an association between days on campus and a higher prevalence of suicidal thoughts, NSSH and suicide attempts in the last year. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a sharp increase and disturbing levels of mental health problems and suicide risk among students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although causal conclusions cannot be drawn, the associations between closure of campuses and mental problems emphasise the importance of having access to campuses for student well-being.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a national repeated cross-sectional SHoT study, Norwegian higher-education students in March 2021 reported substantially higher mental health problems and suicidal thoughts than in 2010, 2014, and especially 2018. Mental health problems in 2021 varied geographically with COVID-19 cases/restrictions and showed a negative dose–response association with days spent physically on campus.

Key findings

  • Mental health problems increased significantly from 2010 to 2021, with a particularly strong rise from 2018 to 2021: HSCL-5 above cut-off rose from men 27%/women 45% in 2018 to men 41%/women 62% in 2021 (p<0.001); mean HSCL-5 total score rose from 2.00 in 2018 to 2.27 in 2021.
  • Suicidal thoughts in the past 14 days increased from 2010 to 2021 in both male students (8.1% to 15.7%) and female students (7.3% to 14.7%), with the 2018–2021 increase especially strong among female students and largely driven by the “a little” category.
  • In 2021, there were significant geographical differences in adjusted mental health problems; students in the South-Eastern region around Oslo reported significantly more mental health problems, matching the area with the most COVID-19 cases and strictest restrictions.
  • Fewer days physically on campus were associated with worse outcomes: self-harm in the last year was 4.2% among students with no campus days versus 2.9% among those with 7+ days (adjusted OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.67); poor mental health HSCL-5>2 had adjusted OR=1.36 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.43) for no campus days versus 7+ days.

Methods

  • Repeated cross-sectional national SHoT surveys of Norwegian higher-education students aged 18–35: 2010 (n=6053, response rate 22.6%), 2014 (n=13,525, 28.5%), 2018 (n=50,054, 30.8%), and 2021 (n=62,498, 34.4%); SHoT2021 ran 1 March–6 April 2021, was 65.6% women, and had mean age 24.1 years.
  • Mental health problems were measured with the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-5); suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) were assessed with items from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, NSSH thoughts with a Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe item, and students reported days physically spent on campus in the last 14 days.
  • Analyses used Pearson’s χ² tests, estimated marginal means via UNIANOVA adjusting for sociodemographic and COVID-19 factors, and logistic regression adjusting for the same confounders; missing data were low and handled by listwise deletion.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the cross-sectional SHoT2021 design limits examination of directionality between days on campus and mental health/suicide-related variables, so students with existing mental health problems may have spent fewer days on campus.
  • The paper states there were no multiple assessment points before or during the pandemic, so detailed trajectories could not be explored; it also notes possible influence from increasing college attendance over time.
  • The paper states the attendance rate was modest (34.4%), with no information on non-participants other than age and gender, and that non-participation patterns across waves are unknown; it also notes self-report measures, lacking updated HSCL-5 cut-offs, and non-standardised data collection across sites. Evident from the text: repeated cross-sectional data and response rates of 23%–34% mean causal and selection-bias concerns remain, as the authors also acknowledge.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057492

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

15 of 22 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    The increase in mental health problems was notably stronger from 2018 to 2021 than in earlier periods.

    “especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001)”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · boosted
      “Compared with the increase observed between earlier SHoT waves,20 the increase was notably stronger from 2018 to 2021 (figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source

      The Results section, “Trends in HSCL-25 score across survey years” (page unavailable), reports increasing psychological distress through 2018 and a 2018 figure of 26.8% for men. The paper examines surveys from 2010, 2014 and 2018; it provides no 2021 figures or comparison showing that the increase after 2018 was stronger than in earlier periods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • Study design and conductcitation

    Measurement invariance of HSCL-25 across time has been previously confirmed.

    “We have previously confirmed measurement invariance of HSCL-25 across time.20”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source
  • Premisecitation

    Other studies have shown that college students and young people in general are particularly vulnerable for developing ill mental health during the pandemic.

    “Other studies have also shown that college students and young people in general are particularly vulnerable for developing ill mental health during the pandemic,3 5 7 8”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] O'Connor RC et al . Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study. Br J Psychiatry 2020:1–8. source

      The Abstract (Results) and Discussion (Implications) report worse mental-health outcomes among young adults aged 18–29 during the pandemic. The paper does not establish the claim specifically for college students. Its Discussion (Limitations) also says the self-reported measures track symptoms rather than diagnosed mental illness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] source
    • cites [7] Chang, 2021, Prevalence of anxiety symptom and depressive symptom among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis, J Affect Disord source

      The Results report high pooled prevalences of anxiety (31%) and depressive symptoms (34%) among college students during the pandemic, and the Discussion describes the pandemic as a risk factor for their mental health. The paper does not establish that young people in general are particularly vulnerable; its analysis is limited to college students. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationreasoning

    The authors do not consider it likely that a pre-existing pattern of worsening self-reported mental health among students could account for the sudden sharp drop in mental health and increase in suicidal thoughts over just 3 years.

    “we do not consider it likely that this could account for the sudden sharp drop in mental health and increase in suicidal thoughts over just 3 years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source

      The Results section, under ‘Trends in HSCL-25 score across survey years’ (page unavailable), documents worsening self-reported psychological distress among students from 2010 to 2018. The paper does not assess whether that earlier trend could explain a sharp change over three years or report a three-year increase in suicidal thoughts. The ‘we do not consider it likely’ judgment in the citing sentence is the citing authors’ own, not a conclusion established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Previous studies of the general population showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.

    “Our findings differ from previous studies of the general population, which showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The SHoT study is a national student survey for higher education in Norway.

    “The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway.”
    • Also stated in: § Study design, participants and setting · plain
      “The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway, initiated by the three largest student welfare organisations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Being young was associated both with having a recovering and with a deteriorating mental health trajectory.

    “being young was associated both with having a recovering and with a deteriorating trajectory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Most previous studies concluded that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.

    “Most of these studies reported on mental health trajectories during the first few weeks and months following the outbreak, concluding that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that earlier studies found increased psychological distress in the first weeks of lockdown. The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report a rapid subsequent decline in anxiety and depressive symptoms in this study's England sample. The paper does not establish that most previous studies found that full trajectory, or that the decline was similar in magnitude to the initial increase. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pierce et al found that the mental health of the general population steadily improved through to October 2020, but not to pre-pandemic levels.

    “A slightly different picture was provided by Pierce et al who found that the mental health of the general population steadily improved through to October 2020, but not to pre-pandemic levels.26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports average improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms during lockdown and the following weeks. It does not establish improvement through October 2020 or a comparison with pre-pandemic levels; the Limitations state that pre-pandemic severity scores were unavailable. The cited paper is by Saunders et al., not Pierce et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The latter study identified vulnerable subgroups who did not experience overall improvements in mental health, but reported a steadily worsening to levels far worse than before the pandemic.

    “the latter study also identified vulnerable subgroups who did not experience the overall improvements in mental health, but rather reported a steadily worsening to levels far worse than before the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source

      The Discussion reports vulnerable subgroups whose symptoms did not follow the overall improvement, including a group with severe symptoms that continued to increase. But the Limitations section says severity scores before the pandemic were unavailable, so the study cannot establish that symptoms reached levels far worse than before the pandemic. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    People may be more prone to participate in a survey if the topic seems relevant to them personally.

    “people may also be more prone to participate in a survey if the topic seems relevant to them personally.30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Edwards, 2009, Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The prevalence of mental health problems above the HSCL-5 cut-off increased from 27% to 41% in men and from 45% to 62% in women between 2018 and 2021.

    “especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean HSCL-5 scores increased from 1.75 in 2010 to 2.27 in 2021 in the total sample, with all time point differences significant at p<0.001.

    “Total sample | 1.75 | 0.69 | 1.87 | 0.71 | 2.00 | 0.79 | 2.27 | 0.78 | T1<T2<T3<T4*”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · plain
      “Note: *All differences significant at p<0.001.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among students, the prevalence of last-year non-suicidal self-harm increased significantly for male students from 2.1% in 2018 to 2.4% in 2021, but not for female students.

    “the prevalence of NSSH last year increased significantly for male students (from 2.1% to 2.4%, p<0.05), but not for female students”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among students, the prevalence of last-year non-suicidal self-harm thoughts increased significantly for male students from 4.5% in 2018 to 5.0% in 2021, but not for female students.

    “while there was an increase in male students (from 4.5% to 5.0%, p<0.05), no change was observed for female students”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The increase in suicidal thoughts was particularly strong from 2018 to 2021, especially among female students.

    “It is notable that the increase was also particularly strong from 2018 to 2021, especially among female students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The increase in mental health problems was evident both when examining HSCL-5 categorically and continuously.

    “This pattern was evident both when examining the HSCL-5 categorically using predefined cut-offs (figure 2), as well as when using the measure as a continuous mean score (table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant overall increase in students reporting suicidal thoughts in the last 14 days from 2010 to 2021 in both male (8.1% to 15.7%) and female (7.3% to 14.7%) students.

    “There was a significant overall increase in students reporting suicidal thoughts the last 14 days (‘a little’, ‘quite a bit’ or ‘extremely’) from 2010 to 2021 in both male students (from 8.1% to 15.7%) and female students (from 7.3% to 14.7%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were substantial increases in both mental health problems and suicidal thoughts from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 to 2021.

    “there were substantial increases in both mental health problems and suicidal thoughts from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 to 2021.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
      “it does show a disturbingly sharp deterioration of students’ mental health over time, especially from 2018 to 2021.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In sensitivity analyses using last-week self-harm/suicide-related items, the same inverse dose-response pattern emerged, except for actual suicide attempt last week due to low statistical power/few events (n=31).

    “The same pattern emerged for these analyses; clear inverse dose–response association (with the exception of actual suicide attempt last week, due to lack of statistical power/few overall events; n=31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The current study provides evidence of a sharp increase and disturbingly high levels of mental health problems and suicide-related factors among students pursuing higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “the current study provides evidence of a sharp increase and disturbingly high levels of mental health problems and suicide-related factors among students pursuing higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Mental health problems and suicide risk among students increased sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “This study demonstrates a sharp increase and disturbing levels of mental health problems and suicide risk among students during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    There was generally very little missing data (n<140 of 62,498) on the included variables.

    “There was generally very little missing data (n<140 of 62 498) on the included variables, and the missing values were handled using listwise deletion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    An average score on the HSCL-5 >2.0 is commonly used as a cut-off for identifying a high level of mental health problems, and corresponds well with the original cut-off of 1.75 on the HSCL-25.

    “An average score on the HSCL-5 >2.0 is commonly used as a cut-off for identifying a high level of mental health problems, and corresponds well with the original cut-off of 1.75 on the longer version HSCL-25.18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The response rates in SHoT studies ranged from 23% to 34%.

    “Limitations of the study include the relatively low response rates in SHoT studies (23%–34%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The SHoT2021 study had a response rate of 34.4% (62,498 of 181,828 invited students).

    “In all, 181 828 students were invited to participate, of which 62 498 students completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 34.4%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample was large and heterogeneous.

    “The strengths of the study include the large and heterogeneous sample”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The HSCL-5 is a screening tool designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression.

    “Mental health problems were assessed using The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-5),17 derived from the 90-item Symptom Checklist, a screening tool designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not include multiple assessment points prior to or during the pandemic, and thus was unable to explore detailed trajectories of students' mental health.

    “the study did not include multiple assessments points neither prior to or during the pandemic, and as such we were unable to explore detailed trajectories of the students’ mental health from pre-pandemic to during, and during the first weeks and months of the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The attendance rate was relatively modest (34.4%), with no information about non-participants other than age and gender distribution.

    “the attendance rate was relatively modest (34.4%), with no information about non-participants other than the age and gender distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Strengths of the current study include the large and heterogeneous sample, and use of official data documenting COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions that pertain to the same timeframe as the SHoT data collection.

    “Strengths of the current study include the large and heterogeneous sample, and use of official data documenting the COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions which pertain to the same timeframe as the SHoT data collection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    It is not known to what extent non-participation patterns were similar across study waves.

    “We neither know to what extent non-participation patterns were similar across study waves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Updated optimal cut-offs for HSCL-5 in general, and for student populations in particular, are lacking.

    “updated optimal cut-offs for HSCL-5 in general, and for student populations in particular, are lacking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Students may have been vulnerable due to the many restrictions specifically targeting students in Norway.

    “Students may also have been vulnerable due to the many restrictions specifically targeting students in Norway.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mental health outcomes in countries with a more severe COVID-19 situation and stricter lockdown measures may be even worse.

    “mental health outcomes in countries with a more severe COVID-19 situation and stricter lockdown measures may be even worse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies from the general population have found lower levels of mental health problems during the COVID-19 outbreak in Norway compared with other countries.

    “studies from the general population have found lower levels of mental health problems during the COVID-19 outbreak in Norway compared with other countries.27”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Geirdal, 2021, Mental health, quality of life, wellbeing, loneliness and use of social media in a time of social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak. A cross-country comparative study, J Ment Health source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Non-participants of health surveys generally have worse health than participants.

    “non-participants of health surveys generally have worse health than participants,29”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Common spaces including campuses, recreational facilities and cafes and pubs may be more important venues for social contact for students than for younger and older people, and thus restrictions may have a larger impact on students' lives.

    “Common spaces including campuses, recreational facilities and cafes and pubs may be more important venues for social contact for students than both younger and older people, and thus the restrictions may have a larger impact on their lives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study did not standardise data collection procedures across sites, with some but not all universities allowing students to fill out the questionnaire during lectures.

    “we did not standardise the data collection procedures across sites, with some (but not all), universities allowing their students to fill out the questionnaire during lectures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vulnerability of students could be due to being in a developmental period with many changes, including establishing new social networks and social roles.

    “The vulnerability could both be in terms of being in a developmental period with many changes, and including establishing new social networks and social roles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There were large geographical differences in the prevalence of mental health problems in 2021, which corresponded closely to both levels of COVID-19 cases and regionally dependent COVID-19 restrictions in Norway.

    “There were also large geographical differences in the prevalence of mental health problems in 2021, which corresponded closely to both levels of COVID-19 cases in these areas of Norway and the regionally dependent COVID-19 restrictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    It is possible that students with existing mental health problems spend fewer days on campus compared with students without such problems.

    “we cannot disregard the possibility of the students with existing mental health problems will spend fewer days on campus, compared with students without such problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The self-report limitation is unlikely to explain any of the main findings of this study.

    “this latter limitation is unlikely to explain any of the main findings of this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The increase in the number of students attending college and university over time may have influenced the results.

    “we cannot disregard the possibility that the increase in the number of students attending college and university from over time may have influenced the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.

    “The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway”
    “This differs a little from the gender distribution in higher education in Norway during the same period (around 60% women).24”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Days spent physically on campus is a valid indicator of exposure to COVID-19-related campus restrictions.

    “All students were also asked how many days they had physically spent on campus during the last 14 days, due to COVID-19 restrictions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.

    “The four studies were conducted separately (not a longitudinal data collection).”
    “Data were compared with previous waves, conducted in 2018, 2014 and 2010.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    It is unknown whether different levels of COVID-19 constraints affect students' mental health.

    “It remains unknown if such different levels of constraints might have an effect on the students’ mental health.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Suicidal-thoughts odds ratio lies outside its confidence interval

    Major

    For students with no days on campus, the reported suicidal-thoughts OR is 1.42, but its stated 95% CI ends at 1.25. That interval also includes 1, making the discrepancy consequential to the reported association.

  • Suicide-attempt odds ratio lies outside its confidence interval

    Major

    For students with no days on campus, the reported suicide-attempt OR of 2.15 exceeds its stated 95% CI upper limit of 1.46. The estimate and interval cannot both be correct.

  • Conflicting percentages of students testing positive

    Minor

    The Results text says 2.4% tested positive for COVID-19, while Table 1 reports 2.9%.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1002/bs.3830190102 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivertsen, B., Knapstad, M., Petrie, K., O’Connor, R., Lønning, K. J., & Hysing, M.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Norwegian Medical Association (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Sivertsen, Børge
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
e057492
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210947429
Cited by
49
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Norwegian Ministry of Education (n/a)
  • Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services (n/a)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
student mental health, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, COVID-19 pandemic, campus closure, COVID-19 restrictions, university students, gender differences, regional variation, dose-response relationship, student well-being
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Risk Factors, Students, Pandemics, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review