Changes in mental health problems and suicidal behaviour in students and their associations with COVID-19-related restrictions in Norway: a national repeated cross-sectional analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on higher education, with the closure of student campuses. The aim of this study was to examine changes and prevalence of mental health problems, suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour, and their associations with COVID-19-related restrictions. Design, setting and participants: As part of the SHoT-study in Norway, 62 498 students completed an online questionnaire (65.6% women; response rate of 34.4%) in March 2021. Data were compared with previous waves, conducted in 2018, 2014 and 2010. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Mental health problems were assessed using the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist. Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) were assessed with three items drawn from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, and thoughts of NSSH were assessed with one item from the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study. Results: There was a significant increase in mental health problems from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001). A similar pattern was also observed for suicidal thoughts. Unlike previous waves, there were large geographical differences in mental health problems in 2021, which mapped onto the different levels of COVID-19 cases and regional COVID-19-related restrictions. There was a significant negative dose–response association between days spent physically on campus and both mental health problems and indicators of suicide risk. We found the fewer days spent on campus in the last 2 weeks, the higher levels of mental health problems during the same time period. There was also an association between days on campus and a higher prevalence of suicidal thoughts, NSSH and suicide attempts in the last year. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a sharp increase and disturbing levels of mental health problems and suicide risk among students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although causal conclusions cannot be drawn, the associations between closure of campuses and mental problems emphasise the importance of having access to campuses for student well-being.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a national repeated cross-sectional SHoT study, Norwegian higher-education students in March 2021 reported substantially higher mental health problems and suicidal thoughts than in 2010, 2014, and especially 2018. Mental health problems in 2021 varied geographically with COVID-19 cases/restrictions and showed a negative dose–response association with days spent physically on campus.
Key findings
- Mental health problems increased significantly from 2010 to 2021, with a particularly strong rise from 2018 to 2021: HSCL-5 above cut-off rose from men 27%/women 45% in 2018 to men 41%/women 62% in 2021 (p<0.001); mean HSCL-5 total score rose from 2.00 in 2018 to 2.27 in 2021.
- Suicidal thoughts in the past 14 days increased from 2010 to 2021 in both male students (8.1% to 15.7%) and female students (7.3% to 14.7%), with the 2018–2021 increase especially strong among female students and largely driven by the “a little” category.
- In 2021, there were significant geographical differences in adjusted mental health problems; students in the South-Eastern region around Oslo reported significantly more mental health problems, matching the area with the most COVID-19 cases and strictest restrictions.
- Fewer days physically on campus were associated with worse outcomes: self-harm in the last year was 4.2% among students with no campus days versus 2.9% among those with 7+ days (adjusted OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.67); poor mental health HSCL-5>2 had adjusted OR=1.36 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.43) for no campus days versus 7+ days.
Methods
- Repeated cross-sectional national SHoT surveys of Norwegian higher-education students aged 18–35: 2010 (n=6053, response rate 22.6%), 2014 (n=13,525, 28.5%), 2018 (n=50,054, 30.8%), and 2021 (n=62,498, 34.4%); SHoT2021 ran 1 March–6 April 2021, was 65.6% women, and had mean age 24.1 years.
- Mental health problems were measured with the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-5); suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) were assessed with items from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, NSSH thoughts with a Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe item, and students reported days physically spent on campus in the last 14 days.
- Analyses used Pearson’s χ² tests, estimated marginal means via UNIANOVA adjusting for sociodemographic and COVID-19 factors, and logistic regression adjusting for the same confounders; missing data were low and handled by listwise deletion.
Limitations
- The paper states that the cross-sectional SHoT2021 design limits examination of directionality between days on campus and mental health/suicide-related variables, so students with existing mental health problems may have spent fewer days on campus.
- The paper states there were no multiple assessment points before or during the pandemic, so detailed trajectories could not be explored; it also notes possible influence from increasing college attendance over time.
- The paper states the attendance rate was modest (34.4%), with no information on non-participants other than age and gender, and that non-participation patterns across waves are unknown; it also notes self-report measures, lacking updated HSCL-5 cut-offs, and non-standardised data collection across sites. Evident from the text: repeated cross-sectional data and response rates of 23%–34% mean causal and selection-bias concerns remain, as the authors also acknowledge.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
15 of 22 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The increase in mental health problems was notably stronger from 2018 to 2021 than in earlier periods.
“especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · boosted
“Compared with the increase observed between earlier SHoT waves,20 the increase was notably stronger from 2018 to 2021 (figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source
The Results section, “Trends in HSCL-25 score across survey years” (page unavailable), reports increasing psychological distress through 2018 and a 2018 figure of 26.8% for men. The paper examines surveys from 2010, 2014 and 2018; it provides no 2021 figures or comparison showing that the increase after 2018 was stronger than in earlier periods. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · boosted
- Study design and conductcitation
Measurement invariance of HSCL-25 across time has been previously confirmed.
“We have previously confirmed measurement invariance of HSCL-25 across time.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source
- Premisecitation
Other studies have shown that college students and young people in general are particularly vulnerable for developing ill mental health during the pandemic.
“Other studies have also shown that college students and young people in general are particularly vulnerable for developing ill mental health during the pandemic,3 5 7 8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] O'Connor RC et al . Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study. Br J Psychiatry 2020:1–8. source
The Abstract (Results) and Discussion (Implications) report worse mental-health outcomes among young adults aged 18–29 during the pandemic. The paper does not establish the claim specifically for college students. Its Discussion (Limitations) also says the self-reported measures track symptoms rather than diagnosed mental illness. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] source
- cites [7] Chang, 2021, Prevalence of anxiety symptom and depressive symptom among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis, J Affect Disord source
The Results report high pooled prevalences of anxiety (31%) and depressive symptoms (34%) among college students during the pandemic, and the Discussion describes the pandemic as a risk factor for their mental health. The paper does not establish that young people in general are particularly vulnerable; its analysis is limited to college students. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The authors do not consider it likely that a pre-existing pattern of worsening self-reported mental health among students could account for the sudden sharp drop in mental health and increase in suicidal thoughts over just 3 years.
“we do not consider it likely that this could account for the sudden sharp drop in mental health and increase in suicidal thoughts over just 3 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Knapstad, 2021, Trends in self-reported psychological distress among college and university students from 2010 to 2018, Psychol Med source
The Results section, under ‘Trends in HSCL-25 score across survey years’ (page unavailable), documents worsening self-reported psychological distress among students from 2010 to 2018. The paper does not assess whether that earlier trend could explain a sharp change over three years or report a three-year increase in suicidal thoughts. The ‘we do not consider it likely’ judgment in the citing sentence is the citing authors’ own, not a conclusion established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous studies of the general population showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.
“Our findings differ from previous studies of the general population, which showed improvements in mental health problems following an initial deterioration at the beginning of the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
- Premisecitation
The two French studies by Wathelet and colleagues found that living under quarantine was associated with high rates of mental health problems and probable PTSD among students.
“the current study extends on the two French studies by Wathelet and colleagues, who found living under quarantine was associated with high rates if mental health problems and probable PTSD among students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Wathelet, 2020, Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic, JAMA Netw Open source
The Discussion and Conclusions report high rates of mental health symptoms among French university students while they were quarantined. But the Discussion > Limitations says the study cannot establish a direct association with quarantine, and that its distress measure cannot diagnose PTSD. This paper also does not establish the claim about two studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] Wathelet, 2021, Prevalence of and factors associated with post-traumatic stress disorder among French university students 1 month after the COVID-19 lockdown, Transl Psychiatry source
- Findingown data
There was a significant negative dose-response association between days spent physically on campus and mental health problems.
“There was a significant negative dose–response association between days spent physically on campus and both mental health problems and indicators of suicide risk.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“We found the fewer days spent on campus in the last 2 weeks, the higher levels of mental health problems during the same time period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Days spent physically on campus is a valid indicator of exposure to COVID-19-related campus restrictions.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The 2021 survey revealed significant geographical differences in adjusted mental health problems during data collection in March 2021.
“the 2021 survey revealed significant geographical differences in adjusted mental health problems during the data collection in March 2021.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male students' prevalences of non-suicidal self-harm and non-suicidal self-harm thoughts remained significantly lower than female students'.
“the prevalences observed for male students, especially for NSSH and NSSH thoughts, remained significantly lower than for female students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In March 2021, there were large geographical variations in imposed national, regional and local COVID-19-related restrictions in Norway.
“there were also large geographical variations in terms of imposed national, regional and local COVID-19-related restrictions in March 2021.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Students spending 7+ days on campus in the last 2 weeks reported significantly fewer mental health problems than students who were not permitted on campus, after adjusting for sociodemographic and COVID-19-related factors.
“Students spending 7+ days on campus the last 2 weeks, reported significantly fewer mental health problems during this period, compared with students who were not permitted on campus, after adjusting for sociodemographic-related and COVID-19-related factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The trend in mental health problems was similar in both male and female students.
“The trend was similar in both male and female students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
- Findingown data
Students studying at an institution in the South-Eastern region reported significantly more mental health problems than students in other geographical regions, after adjusting for sociodemographic and COVID-19-related factors.
“students studying at an institution in South-Eastern region (marked in red) reported significantly more mental health problems compared with other geographical regions, after adjusting for sociodemographic-related and COVID-19-related factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a similar inverse dose-response association between days spent on campus and recent non-suicidal self-harm, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts.
“A similar inverse dose–response association was observed between days spent on campus and recent NSSH, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant negative dose-response association between mental health problems and days spent on campus.
“there was a significant negative dose–response association between mental health problems and days spent on campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant increase in mental health problems among Norwegian higher education students from 2010 to 2021.
“There was a significant increase in mental health problems from 2010 to 2021”
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · plain
“There was a significant increase in mental health problems from 2010 to 2021.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · plain
- Findingown data
In March 2021, the South-Eastern region surrounding Oslo had substantially more COVID-19 cases than other areas in Norway.
“In March 2021, the South-Eastern region surrounding the capital of Oslo (marked in red) had substantially more COVID-19 cases compared with other areas in Norway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 2021, there were large geographical differences in mental health problems among students.
“Unlike previous waves, there were large geographical differences in mental health problems in 2021”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Findingown data
The increase in suicidal thoughts from 2018 to 2021 was largely driven by change in the 'a little' category, not the 'extremely' category.
“The increase from 2018 to 2021 was largely driven by change in the ‘a little’ category, and not so much in the ‘extremely’ category.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
- Findingown data
There were no significant changes in last-year suicide attempt.
“There were no significant changes in last year suicide attempt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The strictest COVID-19 measures in March 2021 followed the same geographical distribution as the COVID-19 cases.
“the strictest measures (marked in red) followed the same geographical distribution as the COVID-19 cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant negative dose-response association between days spent physically on campus and indicators of suicide risk (suicidal thoughts, NSSH, suicide attempts).
“There was a significant negative dose–response association between days spent physically on campus and both mental health problems and indicators of suicide risk.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“There was also an association between days on campus and a higher prevalence of suicidal thoughts, NSSH and suicide attempts in the last year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Days spent physically on campus is a valid indicator of exposure to COVID-19-related campus restrictions.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The prevalence of self-harm in the last year was 4.2% among students who spent no days on campus in the last 2 weeks, compared with 2.9% among students who spent 7+ days on campus (adjusted OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.67).
“the prevalence of self-harm in the last year was 4.2% among students who spent no days on campus in the last 2 weeks, compared with 2.9% among students who spent 7+ days on campus (adj. OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.67).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similar significant graded associations were observed for the other three self-harm and suicide-related items.
“Similar significant graded associations were observed also for the other three self-harm and suicide-related items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Previous studies have shown very high correlations between the HSCL-5 and the HSCL-25 (r>0.91).
“Previous studies have shown very high correlations between the HSCL-5 and the widely used HSCL-25 (r>0.91).19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
- Premisecitation
From 25 March 2021, the Norwegian government imposed stricter national measures due to a rise in infection cases.
“In the later part of the data collection (from 25 March),16 the government imposed stricter national measures due to a rise in infection cases and worry about more contagious strains of the virus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] The Ministry of Health and Care Services . The government is implementing stricter national measures, 2021.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Previous SHoT waves from 2010 to 2018 found only marginal or no geographical differences in mental health problems.
“Although the SHoT waves from 2010 to 2018 found only marginal or no geographical differences in mental health problems,25”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“While previous data waves of the SHoT study have found quite similar levels of mental health problems across all geographical regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Knapstad M . Sivertsen Studentenes helse- og trivelsundersøkelse 2018 2018.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationown data
The geographical differences in mental health problems in 2021 mapped onto different levels of COVID-19 cases and regional COVID-19-related restrictions.
“which mapped onto the different levels of COVID-19 cases and regional COVID-19-related restrictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Study design and conductnone given
The study used official data documenting COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions that pertained to the same timeframe as the latest self-report data collection.
“The strengths of the study include the large and heterogeneous sample, and use of official data documenting the COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions which pertain to the same timeframe as the latest self-report data collection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The current study suggests that college students and young people are particularly vulnerable for developing ill mental health during the pandemic.
“the current study does indeed suggest this to be the case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Although causal conclusions cannot be drawn, the current study may indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted on students' mental health.
“Although causal conclusions cannot be drawn, the current study may indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted on students’ mental health.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Assessment of mental health problems and suicide-related variables was based on self-report, and consequently subject to demand characteristics.
“assessment of mental health problems and the suicide-related variables were based on self-report, and consequently are subject to demand characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combined with the current study, the data stress the importance of access to campuses for student well-being.
“Combined with the current study, these data stress the importance of access to campuses for student well-being.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The close link between limited access to college campuses and mental ill-health emphasises the negative effects of social isolation during prolonged campus lockdown.
“The close link between limited access to college campuses and mental ill-health emphasises the negative effects of social isolation during prolonged campus lockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The cross-sectional design of SHoT2021 limits the ability to examine the directionality between days spent on campus and mental health problems and suicide-related variables.
“The most important study limitation is the cross-sectional design of the SHoT2021, which limits our ability to examine the directionality between days spent on campus and mental health problems and suicide-related variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
- May combine two claims. 22
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SHoT study is a national student survey for higher education in Norway.
“The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway.”
- Also stated in: § Study design, participants and setting · plain
“The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway, initiated by the three largest student welfare organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] source
- Also stated in: § Study design, participants and setting · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBeing young was associated both with having a recovering and with a deteriorating mental health trajectory.
“being young was associated both with having a recovering and with a deteriorating trajectory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMost previous studies concluded that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.
“Most of these studies reported on mental health trajectories during the first few weeks and months following the outbreak, concluding that a swift increase in mental health problems in the early stages of the pandemic was quickly followed by a similar decline in symptoms of anxiety and depression.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that earlier studies found increased psychological distress in the first weeks of lockdown. The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report a rapid subsequent decline in anxiety and depressive symptoms in this study's England sample. The paper does not establish that most previous studies found that full trajectory, or that the decline was similar in magnitude to the initial increase. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPierce et al found that the mental health of the general population steadily improved through to October 2020, but not to pre-pandemic levels.
“A slightly different picture was provided by Pierce et al who found that the mental health of the general population steadily improved through to October 2020, but not to pre-pandemic levels.26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports average improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms during lockdown and the following weeks. It does not establish improvement through October 2020 or a comparison with pre-pandemic levels; the Limitations state that pre-pandemic severity scores were unavailable. The cited paper is by Saunders et al., not Pierce et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe latter study identified vulnerable subgroups who did not experience overall improvements in mental health, but reported a steadily worsening to levels far worse than before the pandemic.
“the latter study also identified vulnerable subgroups who did not experience the overall improvements in mental health, but rather reported a steadily worsening to levels far worse than before the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Saunders, 2021, Understanding different trajectories of mental health across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, Psychol Med source
The Discussion reports vulnerable subgroups whose symptoms did not follow the overall improvement, including a group with severe symptoms that continued to increase. But the Limitations section says severity scores before the pandemic were unavailable, so the study cannot establish that symptoms reached levels far worse than before the pandemic. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPeople may be more prone to participate in a survey if the topic seems relevant to them personally.
“people may also be more prone to participate in a survey if the topic seems relevant to them personally.30”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Edwards, 2009, Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe prevalence of mental health problems above the HSCL-5 cut-off increased from 27% to 41% in men and from 45% to 62% in women between 2018 and 2021.
“especially from 2018 (men: 27%/women: 45%) to 2021 (men: 41%/women: 62%, p <0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean HSCL-5 scores increased from 1.75 in 2010 to 2.27 in 2021 in the total sample, with all time point differences significant at p<0.001.
“Total sample | 1.75 | 0.69 | 1.87 | 0.71 | 2.00 | 0.79 | 2.27 | 0.78 | T1<T2<T3<T4*”
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · plain
“Note: *All differences significant at p<0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
- Also stated in: § Changes in mental health problems · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong students, the prevalence of last-year non-suicidal self-harm increased significantly for male students from 2.1% in 2018 to 2.4% in 2021, but not for female students.
“the prevalence of NSSH last year increased significantly for male students (from 2.1% to 2.4%, p<0.05), but not for female students”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong students, the prevalence of last-year non-suicidal self-harm thoughts increased significantly for male students from 4.5% in 2018 to 5.0% in 2021, but not for female students.
“while there was an increase in male students (from 4.5% to 5.0%, p<0.05), no change was observed for female students”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe increase in suicidal thoughts was particularly strong from 2018 to 2021, especially among female students.
“It is notable that the increase was also particularly strong from 2018 to 2021, especially among female students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe increase in mental health problems was evident both when examining HSCL-5 categorically and continuously.
“This pattern was evident both when examining the HSCL-5 categorically using predefined cut-offs (figure 2), as well as when using the measure as a continuous mean score (table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a significant overall increase in students reporting suicidal thoughts in the last 14 days from 2010 to 2021 in both male (8.1% to 15.7%) and female (7.3% to 14.7%) students.
“There was a significant overall increase in students reporting suicidal thoughts the last 14 days (‘a little’, ‘quite a bit’ or ‘extremely’) from 2010 to 2021 in both male students (from 8.1% to 15.7%) and female students (from 7.3% to 14.7%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were substantial increases in both mental health problems and suicidal thoughts from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 to 2021.
“there were substantial increases in both mental health problems and suicidal thoughts from 2010 to 2021, and especially from 2018 to 2021.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“it does show a disturbingly sharp deterioration of students’ mental health over time, especially from 2018 to 2021.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn sensitivity analyses using last-week self-harm/suicide-related items, the same inverse dose-response pattern emerged, except for actual suicide attempt last week due to low statistical power/few events (n=31).
“The same pattern emerged for these analyses; clear inverse dose–response association (with the exception of actual suicide attempt last week, due to lack of statistical power/few overall events; n=31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe current study provides evidence of a sharp increase and disturbingly high levels of mental health problems and suicide-related factors among students pursuing higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“the current study provides evidence of a sharp increase and disturbingly high levels of mental health problems and suicide-related factors among students pursuing higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMental health problems and suicide risk among students increased sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“This study demonstrates a sharp increase and disturbing levels of mental health problems and suicide risk among students during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
- Rests on an assumption: The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThere was generally very little missing data (n<140 of 62,498) on the included variables.
“There was generally very little missing data (n<140 of 62 498) on the included variables, and the missing values were handled using listwise deletion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAn average score on the HSCL-5 >2.0 is commonly used as a cut-off for identifying a high level of mental health problems, and corresponds well with the original cut-off of 1.75 on the HSCL-25.
“An average score on the HSCL-5 >2.0 is commonly used as a cut-off for identifying a high level of mental health problems, and corresponds well with the original cut-off of 1.75 on the longer version HSCL-25.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe response rates in SHoT studies ranged from 23% to 34%.
“Limitations of the study include the relatively low response rates in SHoT studies (23%–34%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe SHoT2021 study had a response rate of 34.4% (62,498 of 181,828 invited students).
“In all, 181 828 students were invited to participate, of which 62 498 students completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 34.4%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample was large and heterogeneous.
“The strengths of the study include the large and heterogeneous sample”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe HSCL-5 is a screening tool designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression.
“Mental health problems were assessed using The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-5),17 derived from the 90-item Symptom Checklist, a screening tool designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study did not include multiple assessment points prior to or during the pandemic, and thus was unable to explore detailed trajectories of students' mental health.
“the study did not include multiple assessments points neither prior to or during the pandemic, and as such we were unable to explore detailed trajectories of the students’ mental health from pre-pandemic to during, and during the first weeks and months of the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe attendance rate was relatively modest (34.4%), with no information about non-participants other than age and gender distribution.
“the attendance rate was relatively modest (34.4%), with no information about non-participants other than the age and gender distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenStrengths of the current study include the large and heterogeneous sample, and use of official data documenting COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions that pertain to the same timeframe as the SHoT data collection.
“Strengths of the current study include the large and heterogeneous sample, and use of official data documenting the COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related restrictions which pertain to the same timeframe as the SHoT data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is not known to what extent non-participation patterns were similar across study waves.
“We neither know to what extent non-participation patterns were similar across study waves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenUpdated optimal cut-offs for HSCL-5 in general, and for student populations in particular, are lacking.
“updated optimal cut-offs for HSCL-5 in general, and for student populations in particular, are lacking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningStudents may have been vulnerable due to the many restrictions specifically targeting students in Norway.
“Students may also have been vulnerable due to the many restrictions specifically targeting students in Norway.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMental health outcomes in countries with a more severe COVID-19 situation and stricter lockdown measures may be even worse.
“mental health outcomes in countries with a more severe COVID-19 situation and stricter lockdown measures may be even worse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies from the general population have found lower levels of mental health problems during the COVID-19 outbreak in Norway compared with other countries.
“studies from the general population have found lower levels of mental health problems during the COVID-19 outbreak in Norway compared with other countries.27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Geirdal, 2021, Mental health, quality of life, wellbeing, loneliness and use of social media in a time of social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak. A cross-country comparative study, J Ment Health source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNon-participants of health surveys generally have worse health than participants.
“non-participants of health surveys generally have worse health than participants,29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCommon spaces including campuses, recreational facilities and cafes and pubs may be more important venues for social contact for students than for younger and older people, and thus restrictions may have a larger impact on students' lives.
“Common spaces including campuses, recreational facilities and cafes and pubs may be more important venues for social contact for students than both younger and older people, and thus the restrictions may have a larger impact on their lives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study did not standardise data collection procedures across sites, with some but not all universities allowing students to fill out the questionnaire during lectures.
“we did not standardise the data collection procedures across sites, with some (but not all), universities allowing their students to fill out the questionnaire during lectures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe vulnerability of students could be due to being in a developmental period with many changes, including establishing new social networks and social roles.
“The vulnerability could both be in terms of being in a developmental period with many changes, and including establishing new social networks and social roles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere were large geographical differences in the prevalence of mental health problems in 2021, which corresponded closely to both levels of COVID-19 cases and regionally dependent COVID-19 restrictions in Norway.
“There were also large geographical differences in the prevalence of mental health problems in 2021, which corresponded closely to both levels of COVID-19 cases in these areas of Norway and the regionally dependent COVID-19 restrictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIt is possible that students with existing mental health problems spend fewer days on campus compared with students without such problems.
“we cannot disregard the possibility of the students with existing mental health problems will spend fewer days on campus, compared with students without such problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe self-report limitation is unlikely to explain any of the main findings of this study.
“this latter limitation is unlikely to explain any of the main findings of this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe increase in the number of students attending college and university over time may have influenced the results.
“we cannot disregard the possibility that the increase in the number of students attending college and university from over time may have influenced the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The SHoT samples are representative of the Norwegian higher education student population.
“The SHoT study (Students’ Health and Well-being Study) is a national student survey for higher education in Norway”
“This differs a little from the gender distribution in higher education in Norway during the same period (around 60% women).24”
The paper relies on this without support.
Days spent physically on campus is a valid indicator of exposure to COVID-19-related campus restrictions.
“All students were also asked how many days they had physically spent on campus during the last 14 days, due to COVID-19 restrictions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four SHoT waves are comparable for examining trends in mental health problems and suicidal thoughts.
“The four studies were conducted separately (not a longitudinal data collection).”
“Data were compared with previous waves, conducted in 2018, 2014 and 2010.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is unknown whether different levels of COVID-19 constraints affect students' mental health.
“It remains unknown if such different levels of constraints might have an effect on the students’ mental health.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Suicidal-thoughts odds ratio lies outside its confidence interval
MajorFor students with no days on campus, the reported suicidal-thoughts OR is 1.42, but its stated 95% CI ends at 1.25. That interval also includes 1, making the discrepancy consequential to the reported association.
“| Suicidal thoughts | 1.42 | 0.98 to 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.19 to 1.49 | 1.14 | 1.00 to 1.30 | 1.00 | – |”
“Suicidal thoughts | 1.42 | 0.98 to 1.25”
Suicide-attempt odds ratio lies outside its confidence interval
MajorFor students with no days on campus, the reported suicide-attempt OR of 2.15 exceeds its stated 95% CI upper limit of 1.46. The estimate and interval cannot both be correct.
“| Suicide attempts | 2.15 | 1.18 to 1.46 | 1.95 | 1.13 to 3.35 | 1.41 | 0.74 to 2.68 | 1.00 | – |”
“Suicide attempts | 2.15 | 1.18 to 1.46”
Conflicting percentages of students testing positive
MinorThe Results text says 2.4% tested positive for COVID-19, while Table 1 reports 2.9%.
“only 2.4% of the sample had tested positive for COVID-19”
“| Tested positive, % (n) | 2.9 (1780) |”
Cites
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review
Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M. W., Gill, H., Phan, L., Chen-Li, D., Iacobucci, M., Ho, R., Majeed, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001 · Cited by 5,204 · see citing works
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830190102 · Cited by 4,604 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There was generally very little missing data (n 140 of 62 498) on the included variables, and the missing values were handled using listwise deletion.”
MethodPierce, M., Hope, H., Ford, T., Hatch, S., Hotopf, M., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R., Wessely, S., McManus, S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30308-4 · Cited by 2,621 · see citing works
Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic
Ali, W. (2020) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v10n3p16 · Cited by 1,758 · see citing works
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. J., DiGuiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., Felix, L. M., & Pratap, S. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000008.pub4 · Cited by 1,379 · cited 1× · see citing works
“9 Still, findings remain inconsistent, as a living systematic review of longitudinal studies does not suggest significant change in mental health among university students from before to during the COVID-19.”
BackgroundStrand, B. H., Dalgard, O. S., Tambs, K., & Rognerud, M. (2003) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039480310000932 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Fancourt, D., Steptoe, A., & Bu, F. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30482-x · Cited by 1,161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Students may be particularly vulnerable to social restrictions and social isolation, 6 as they often live alone and are more likely to be single.”
BackgroundO'Connor, R. C., Wetherall, K., Cleare, S., McClelland, H., Melson, A. J., Niedzwiedz, C. L., O'Carroll, R. E., O'Connor, D. B., Platt, S., Scowcroft, E., et al. (2021) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.212 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Madge, N., Hewitt, A., Hawton, K., Wilde, E. J. D., Corcoran, P., Fekete, S., Heeringen, K. V., Leo, D. D., & Ystgaard, M. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01879.x · Cited by 750 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There was generally very little missing data (n 140 of 62 498) on the included variables, and the missing values were handled using listwise deletion.”
MethodWathelet, M., Duhem, S., Vaiva, G., Baubet, T., Habran, E., Veerapa, E., Debien, C., Molenda, S., Horn, M., Grandgenèvre, P., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591 · Cited by 747 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A large French study found a high prevalence of mental health problems among students who experienced quarantine, 12 and the rate of probable Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among university students remained high 1 month after living in quarantine during the national lockdown in France.”
BackgroundDeng, J., Zhou, F., Hou, W., Silver, Z. A., Wong, C. Y., Chang, O., Drakos, A., Zuo, Q., & Huang, E. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113863 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Symptoms of Emotional Distress in a Family Planning Service: Stability over a Four-Week Period
Winokur, A., Winokur, D. F., Rickels, K., & Cox, D. S. (1984) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.144.4.395 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Pierce, M., McManus, S., Hope, H., Hotopf, M., Ford, T., Hatch, S. L., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R. T., Wessely, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00151-6 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Savage, M. J., James, R. M., Magistro, D., Donaldson, J. A., Healy, L. C., Nevill, M. E., & Hennis, P. J. (2020) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100357 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
The Health Status of Nonparticipants in a Population-based Health Study: The Hordaland Health Study
Knudsen, A. K., Hotopf, M., Skogen, J. C., Overland, S., & Mykletun, A. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq257 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Chang, J.-J., Ji, Y., Li, Y.-H., Pan, H.-F., & Su, P.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.109 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Geirdal, A. Ø., Ruffolo, M., Leung, J., Thygesen, H., Price, D., Bonsaksen, T., & Schoultz, M. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1875413 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Knapstad, M., Sivertsen, B., Knudsen, A. K., Smith, O. R. F., Aarø, L. E., Lønning, K. J., & Skogen, J. C. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719003350 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationSaunders, R., Buckman, J. E. J., Fonagy, P., & Fancourt, D. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721000957 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Knudsen, A. K., Stene‐Larsen, K., Gustavson, K., Hotopf, M. H., Kessler, R. C., Krokstad, S., Skogen, J. C., Øverland, S. N., & Reneflot, A. (2020) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100071 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Sivertsen, B., Råkil, H., Munkvik, E., & Lønning, K. J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025200 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationWathelet, M., Fovet, T., Jousset, A., Duhem, S., Habran, E., Horn, M., Debien, C., Notredame, C.-E., Baubet, T., Vaiva, G., et al. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01438-z · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“13 However, there is a need for more studies to examine to what extent mental health problems could potentially be associated with different levels of imposed restrictions.”
BackgroundO'Connor, D. B., Wilding, S., Ferguson, E., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r8cdw · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gratz, K. L., Mann, A. J., & Tull, M. T. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114034 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“11 However, the evidence base is largely focused on the first part of the pandemic, and the longstanding effects of restrictions over time have been less studied.”
BackgroundSun, Y., Wu, Y., Fan, S., Santo, T. D., Li, L., Jiang, X., Li, K., Wang, Y., Tasleem, A., Krishnan, A., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.10.21256920 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/bs.3830190102 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suicide before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Yan, Y., Hou, J., Li, Q., & Yu, N. X. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20043346 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“, 2022 [100] Norway Repeated Cross-Sectional College Students Pre 1 (8124); Pre 2 (13,663); Pre 3 (49,836); Peri (59,028) Pre 1 (24.”
Sivertsen, B., Knudsen, A. K., Kirkøen, B., Skogen, J. C., Lagerstrøm, B. O., Lønning, K.-J., Kessler, R. C., & Reneflot, A. (2023) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100732 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“While especially students showed a sharp deterioration in mental health in the initial phase of the pandemic, 19,20 the current study demonstrates that the mental health of college and university students remains an issue of concern.”
BackgroundSelf-citationStea, T. H., Bonsaksen, T., Smith, P., Kleppang, A. L., Steigen, A. M., Leonhardt, M., Lien, L., & Vettore, M. V. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05696-1 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Specific indirect paths between non-adjacent variables were calculated through the multiplication of standardized beta coefficients estimated in the direct paths in the parsimonious model among females (Appendix 6) and males (Appendix 7).”
BackgroundMethodThe Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adolescents: An Opportunity to Build Resilient Systems
Nadeem, E., & Meter, A. V. (2023) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171221140641d · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The Emotions, Coping, and Psychological Well-Being in Time of COVID-19: Case of Master’s Students
Dumčienė, A., & Požėrienė, J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19106014 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“During the COVID-19 pandemic, the level of mental health problems and suicide risk among students also increased significantly and the level increased with increasing periods of isolation [14].”
BackgroundTsiouris, A., Werner, A. M., Tibubos, A. N., Mülder, L. M., Reichel, J. L., Heller, S., Schäfer, M., Schwab, L., Rigotti, T., Stark, B., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163541 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Matić, T., Pregelj, P., Sadikov, A., & Prelog, P. R. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20010339 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“In line with the results of our study, a national repeated cross-sectional study in Norway showed that one year after the COVID-19 pandemic began, studying under prolonged restrictions may affect the lives of young adults, especially students [32].”
ResultSahoo, S., & Patra, S. (2023) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000906 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ewid, M., Haikal, A., Billah, S. M. B., Kalou, Y., Zitoun, O. A., Alnaser, A. R., Nashawi, M. O., & Almazrou, A. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000033487 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“[11] Medical students in particular are at higher risk for depression, anxiety and stress due to the huge study load, multiple assessments, lengthy and costly study programs, and possible contact with COVID-19 cases during hospital training.”
Sivertsen, B., Skogen, J. C., Petrie, K. J., O’Connor, R. C., Knudsen, A. K., Kirkøen, B., Reneflot, A., Lønning, K.-J., & Hysing, M. (2025) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2025.10435 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationMaciá-Casas, A., de la Iglesia-Larrad, J. I., García-Ullán, L., Matellán, B. R., Cossio, C. M., Díaz-Trejo, S., Berdión-Marcos, V., Calama-Martín, J., Roncero, C., & Pérez, J. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12100977 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Liu, L., Contreras, G. A., Pollock, N. J., Tonmyr, L., & Thompson, W. (2023) · Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada · doi:10.24095/hpcdp.43.5.05 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Heradstveit, O., Sivertsen, B., Lønning, K.-J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.876841 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationBloise, S., Marcellino, A., Frasacco, B., Gizzone, P., Ciolli, C. P., Martucci, V., Sanseviero, M., Giudice, E. D., Ventriglia, F., & Lubrano, R. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10081224 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In fact, the closure of the school and of other extracurricular activities has caused an important psychosocial harm to children and especially adolescents during these years [76,77].”
BackgroundLoneliness across the COVID-19 pandemic: Risk factors in Norwegian young people
Hysing, M., Petrie, K. J., Harvey, A. G., Lønning, K.-J., & Sivertsen, B. (2023) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.10483 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Similarly, we have previously found that mental health problems were more prevalent among students in areas with a higher level of restrictions for going onto campus and greater online learning (Sivertsen et al., 2022).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Doctor of Physical Therapy Students: A National Survey
Ge, W., Ball, M., Balog-Bickerstaff, N., et al. (2023) · Journal of Physical Therapy Education · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000265 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mental Health in Swiss Veterinary Medicine Students: Variables Associated with Depression Scores
Gurtner, C., Krieger, T., & McConnell, M. (2024) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme-2023-0149 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Underwood, E. C., Horita, R., Imamura, N., Fukao, T., Adachi, M., Tajirika, S., Izurieta, R., & Yamamoto, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12090902 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In addition, there are limited reports on how COVID-19 restrictions have affected mental health among higher education students in Japan [11] and Europe [12,13].”
BackgroundHassan, M., Fang, S., Rizwan, M. S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Promotion · doi:10.32604/ijmhp.2023.043096 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rubio, R. R. M. A., Covarrubias, S., Carpio, L. B., Orquia, J. A., & Tan, M. F. (2025) · Mental Health Global Challenges Journal · doi:10.56508/mhgcj.v8i1.269 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…and depression as the second and third leading causes of death among individuals of this age, with numerous studies reporting that some students consider dropping out or exhibit suicidal tendencies (Alejandria et al., 2023; Bangalan et al., 2023; Grasdalsmoen et al., 2020; Sivertsen et al., 2022).”
Holte, A. (2024) · Mental Health & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2024.200321 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Haug, E., Rønnestad, M., & Smith, O. R. F. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.14666 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“4,29 The cost– benefit of specific restrictions for specific groups and for society as a whole should, therefore, be carefully considered during future virus outbreaks.”
BackgroundHenke, R. M. (2023) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171221140641 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Qiu, Q., Chai, G., Xu, M., & Xiao, J. (2024) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-024-00952-z · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The results showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, psychological symptoms among university students (41% men, 62% women) and the risk of suicide increased dramatically [1].”
ResultYao, Z.-Y., Xu, X., Kou, C., Wang, X., Liu, B.-P., Cheng, S., Jian-guo, G., Lew, B., Wong, J. P., Fung, K. P.-L., et al. (2025) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2025.2476981 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“For example, separate studies in Japan, Canada, and Norway have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic not only increases mental health problems among university students but also increases the risk of suicidal ideation (Horita et al., 2022; King et al., 2023; Sivertsen et al., 2022).”
Rahmon, I. J., Postema, A. S., Bosmans, M. W. G., Marra, E., & Dückers, M. (2025) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105902 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bingo: A Semi-Centralized Password Storage System
Al-Aboosi, A. F., Broner, M., & Al-Aboosi, F. Y. (2022) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp2030023 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Recent studies show that the number of accounts that a single user may use on a weekly basis has grown substantially over the past decade [2].”
BackgroundRogers, A. A., Halvari, A. E. M., Johnsen, J.-A. K., & Solbakk, A. (2023) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2023.2249972 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Auerswald, S., Koddebusch, C., & Hermann, C. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.13013 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ching, B. C. F., Hahn, J. S., Corrie, S., Thomas, R., & Alba, A. (2025) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2024.868 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Cogan, N. A., Murray, A. L., Gardani, M., O'Toole, M., Long, E., Milicev, J., & Leung, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/69yjv · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Creative Project Work as A 21st-Century Education Tool
Poobalan, G., Asman, J., Talip, R., Padan, R., Kaliappan, S., Micheal, C., & Marcus, L. (2022) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v11-i3/14691 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Thus, it may be inferred that the mental health of students is also affected by MCO and Covid-19 (Horita et al., 2022; Sivertsen et al., 2022; Rasheed et al., 2022), resulting in a lack of motivation to study.”
BackgroundClinton, M., Dias, J. M., Doumit, M. A. A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100844 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Crostelli, M., Mazza, O., Manfroni, F., et al. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202308.0987.v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Community Cohesion and the Church's Social Teachings in Light of the Virus Restrictions
Nicolson, S. (2022) · Caritas et Veritas · doi:10.32725/cetv.2022.011
Soudržnost komunity a sociální učení církve ve světle virových omezení
Nicolson, S. (2022) · Caritas et Veritas · doi:10.32725/cetv.2022.010
Selvmord i 2020 under Covid-19-pandemien
Walby, F. A., Myhre, M. Ø., & Giil, E. (2022) · Suicidologi/Nytt i suicidologi · doi:10.5617/suicidologi.9997
Liu, L., Contreras, G. A., Pollock, N. J., Tonmyr, L., & Thompson, W. (2023) · Promotion de la santé et prévention des maladies chroniques au Canada · doi:10.24095/hpcdp.43.5.05f
Unga mäns psykiska ohälsa i Norden
Randell, E. (2023) · TemaNord · doi:10.6027/temanord2023-543
Young men’s mental ill-health in the Nordics
Randell, E. (2023) · TemaNord · doi:10.6027/temanord2023-549
Crostelli, M., Mazza, O., Manfroni, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12237412
Maciá-Casas, A., de la Iglesia-Larrad, J. I., García-Ullán, L., Matellán, B. R., Cossio, C. M., Díaz-Trejo, S., Berdión-Marcos, V., Calama-Martín, J., Roncero, C., & Pérez, J. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3875169/v1
Cogan, N. A., Murray, A. L., O’Toole, M., Long, E., Milicev, J., Leung, M., Kyratzi, S., & Gardani, M. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3292219/v1
Rahmon, I. J., Postema, A., Bosmans, M. W. G., Marra, E., & Dückers, M. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.66455
Strategi for et psykisk sunnere folk 2024
Holte, A. (2024) · Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening · doi:10.52734/wjks5460
Relationships Between Study Conditions, Stress, and Perceived Health
Fostervold, K. I., Rème, S. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-734-320251006 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Stea, T. H., Bonsaksen, T., Smith, P., Kleppang, A. L., Steigen, A. M., Leonhardt, M., Lien, L., & Vettore, M. V. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25511850
Jacobsen, L. M., Haugan, G., Patten, S. B., Braaten, T., Sivertsen, B., & Bjerkeset, O. A. (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08229-0
“From 2018 to 2022, prevalence of DE remained largely the same, while the prevalence of any ED [32] and suicide attempts, self-harm and suicidal ideation increased slightly [30].”
Self-citationRisk Factors for Suicidal Behavior Among European Youth: A Systematic Review
Carmona, A., Corbella-Sotil, A., Colomer-Salvans, A., Sales-Nomen, Q., Mestres-Carbonell, J., Leal‐Pujol, R., Abella, M., Usall, J., & Vila‐Badia, R. (2026) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2026.2718276
- Authors
- Sivertsen, B., Knapstad, M., Petrie, K., O’Connor, R., Lønning, K. J., & Hysing, M.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Norwegian Medical Association (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Sivertsen, Børge
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e057492
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8829843
- OpenAlex
- W4210947429
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Norwegian Ministry of Education (n/a)
- Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services (n/a)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- student mental health, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, COVID-19 pandemic, campus closure, COVID-19 restrictions, university students, gender differences, regional variation, dose-response relationship, student well-being
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Risk Factors, Students, Pandemics, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review