Cited by 99Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsProbability and Statistical Research

Efficient estimation of smooth distributions from coarsely grouped data

Open access
Rizzi, Silvia, Gampe, Jutta, Eilers, Paul H. C.·2015·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Ungrouping binned data can be desirable for many reasons: Bins can be too coarse to allow for accurate analysis; comparisons can be hindered when different grouping approaches are used in different histograms; and the last interval is often wide and open-ended and, thus, covers a lot of information in the tail area. Age group-specific disease incidence rates and abridged life tables are examples of binned data. We propose a versatile method for ungrouping histograms that assumes that only the underlying distribution is smooth. Because of this modest assumption, the approach is suitable for most applications. The method is based on the composite link model, with a penalty added to ensure the smoothness of the target distribution. Estimates are obtained by maximizing a penalized likelihood. This maximization is performed efficiently by a version of the iteratively reweighted least-squares algorithm. Optimal values of the smoothing parameter are chosen by minimizing Akaike's Information Criterion. We demonstrate the performance of this method in a simulation study and provide several examples that illustrate the approach. Wide, open-ended intervals can be handled properly. The method can be extended to the estimation of rates when both the event counts and the exposures to risk are grouped.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwv020

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors dealt with potential death registration delays by harmonizing and smoothing death counts with a PCLM shown to provide reliable estimates of mortality for all countries in the study and by adjusting person-years exposed.

    “We deal with these potential issues by harmonizing and smoothing death counts with a PCLM that has been shown to provide reliable estimates of mortality for all countries in our study26 and by adjusting the person-years exposed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizzi, S., Gampe, J., & Eilers, P. H. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Rizzi, Silvia
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2015-06-16
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
138-147
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2148091099
Cited by
98
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
histogram smoothing, penalized likelihood, iteratively reweighted least squares, Akaike information criterion, bandwidth selection, age-specific incidence, abridged life tables
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review