Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LIFE-COURSE LONGITUDINAL STUDIES ARE NEEDED TO ADVANCE INTEGRATION OF GENOMICS AND SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Belsky, Daniel W·2018·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Genome science offers new opportunities for social epidemiology, including opportunities to observe molecular states and processes hypothesized to mediate effects of social-environmental exposures on morbidity, disability, and mortality (1). With these opportunities come several challenges, some new and some old. Among the new challenges are the very large volume of measurements generated by whole-genome assays, difficulties assigning biological meaning to genomic measurements, and new potential confounders, including the leukocyte composition of blood samples from which genomic measurements are made. The recent article by Levine et al. (2) provides an example of how studies may navigate these new challenges in the context of whole-genome gene-expression data. Among the old challenges is one rightfully highlighted in the recent letter by Huang and Kaufman (3), having to do with causal inference. Our commentary suggested that the gene-expression signature studied by Levine et al., the conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA), might inform understanding of biological processes through which social gradients in health come about. The CTRA comprises down-regulation of viral defenses and up-regulation of inflammation—processes that, if chronically activated, would be health damaging (4). As Huang and Kaufman (3) point out, to establish a mediating role for the CTRA in social gradients in health, life-course longitudinal studies are needed that include repeated measur…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwy060

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Belsky, 2017, Invited commentary: integrating genomics and social epidemiology—analysis of late-life low socioeconomic status and the conserved transcriptional response to adversity, Am J Epidemiol, 186, 510, 10.1093/aje/kwx145 · DOI
  2. Levine, 2017, Contemporaneous social environment and the architecture of late-life gene expression profiles, Am J Epidemiol, 186, 503, 10.1093/aje/kwx147 · DOI
  3. Huang, 2018, Getting serious about embodiment: cautions about interpreting novel findings of socioeconomic patterns in biological function, Am J Epidemiol, 187, 1336, 10.1093/aje/kwx389 · DOI
  4. Belsky, 2013, Is obesity associated with a decline in intelligence quotient during the first half of the life course?, Am J Epidemiol, 178, 1461, 10.1093/aje/kwt135 · DOI
  5. Karlsson Linnér, 2017, An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment, Mol Psychiatry, 22, 1680, 10.1038/mp.2017.210 · DOI
  6. Marzi, 2018, Analysis of DNA methylation in young people: limited evidence for an association between victimization stress and epigenetic variation in blood, Am J Psychiatry, appiajp201717060693

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Belsky, D. W.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2018-04-11
Volume
187
Issue
6
Pages
1337-1338
ISSN
  • 0002-9262
  • 1476-6256
Cited by
104
References
1
Language
en
Funders
NIH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review